Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #238427 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-08-10 16:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-08-14 18:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 135 — 33 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2021-08-10 16:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com> - 2021-08-10 16:40 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2021-08-10 16:50 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-10 18:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2021-08-10 19:10 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-10 19:50 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2021-08-10 20:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2021-08-10 21:00 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-10 21:50 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2021-08-11 08:10 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-11 12:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2021-08-11 12:50 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-11 14:10 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-10 21:00 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2021-08-11 09:30 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-11 12:40 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2021-08-11 14:10 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2021-08-11 14:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2021-08-11 14:30 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-11 15:00 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-11 14:40 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2021-08-11 14:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-11 16:10 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2021-08-11 16:30 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-11 17:00 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2021-08-11 14:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-11 14:50 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-10 17:10 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2021-08-10 17:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2021-08-10 20:00 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-10 21:00 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-11 10:30 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-11 13:40 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-11 00:30 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2021-08-11 09:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-11 09:40 +0200
Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2021-08-11 09:50 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Cindy Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-11 09:50 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-11 10:10 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-08-11 12:30 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2021-08-11 14:40 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-08-12 17:50 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2021-08-12 18:50 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2021-08-12 19:20 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-12 19:50 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-12 21:50 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-08-11 13:30 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2021-08-11 14:30 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-08-11 15:40 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2021-08-11 13:30 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2021-08-11 14:30 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2021-08-11 15:30 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-08-11 15:50 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-08-11 15:40 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2021-08-11 17:50 +0200
Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012) Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2021-08-11 21:00 +0200
End of the line [ was Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012)] Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-11 10:00 +0200
Re: End of the line [ was Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012)] Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2021-08-11 10:10 +0200
Re: End of the line [ was Re: Reply configuration (was: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012)] Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-11 10:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-11 20:10 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-12 21:30 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-12 21:40 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-13 00:30 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-13 01:00 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-13 12:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-13 12:40 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-13 13:10 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-13 01:10 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-14 20:50 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-14 21:40 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-14 23:50 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 deloptes <emanoil.kotsev@deloptes.org> - 2021-08-13 07:10 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Weaver <weaver@riseup.net> - 2021-08-13 07:30 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-08-13 08:20 +0200
OFFTOPIC Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 deloptes <emanoil.kotsev@deloptes.org> - 2021-08-13 08:50 +0200
Re: OFFTOPIC Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-08-13 09:00 +0200
Re: OFFTOPIC Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 deloptes <emanoil.kotsev@deloptes.org> - 2021-08-13 09:00 +0200
Re: OFFTOPIC Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 rhkramer@gmail.com - 2021-08-13 13:50 +0200
Re: OFFTOPIC Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 deloptes <emanoil.kotsev@deloptes.org> - 2021-08-13 13:50 +0200
Re: OFFTOPIC Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 ellanios82 <ellanios82@gmail.com> - 2021-08-13 14:10 +0200
Re: OFFTOPIC Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-08-13 14:00 +0200
Re: Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2021-08-13 09:10 +0200
Re: Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-08-13 10:00 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-13 18:20 +0200
Meta: behavior on list Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-08-13 18:50 +0200
Re: Meta: behavior on list Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-08-13 19:00 +0200
Re: Meta: behavior on list John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2021-08-13 19:40 +0200
Re: Meta: behavior on list Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-13 21:20 +0200
Re: Meta: behavior on list The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-08-13 19:00 +0200
Re: Meta: behavior on list Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-13 19:00 +0200
Re: Meta: behavior on list <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-08-13 19:20 +0200
[OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-08-13 22:20 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2021-08-13 23:10 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-13 23:20 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Weaver <weaver@riseup.net> - 2021-08-13 23:40 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-13 23:40 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Weaver <weaver@riseup.net> - 2021-08-14 00:00 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) ellanios82 <ellanios82@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 00:00 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-08-13 23:40 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Punked was [Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list)] Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-13 23:40 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2021-08-14 01:20 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2021-08-14 01:50 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-14 02:30 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-08-14 07:10 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-08-14 08:30 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2021-08-14 14:40 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] 1149 (was: lonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list)) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-08-14 14:50 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] 1149 (was: lonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list)) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2021-08-14 15:20 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] CoCo and oldies (was : 1149 (was: lonk / was: Meta: behavior on list)) Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-14 15:30 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2021-08-14 15:00 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2021-08-14 17:10 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> - 2021-08-14 21:10 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-14 21:30 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> - 2021-08-14 21:40 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Marco Möller <talby@debianlists.mobilxpress.net> - 2021-08-14 21:40 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2021-08-14 22:00 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> - 2021-08-14 22:00 +0200
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-14 23:30 +0200
Re: Meta: behavior on list deloptes <emanoil.kotsev@deloptes.org> - 2021-08-13 22:40 +0200
Re: Meta: behavior on list "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-08-14 13:00 +0200
Re: Meta: behavior on list <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-08-14 14:10 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2021-08-13 11:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-13 12:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-14 14:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-11 00:40 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-11 20:30 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2021-08-13 13:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-13 15:20 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2021-08-13 15:30 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-13 15:50 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2021-08-13 16:00 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2021-08-13 18:10 +0200
Re: All-in-One printer: HP OfficeJet 8012 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-13 19:40 +0200
HP plat fair with drivers? Keith Bainbridge <ke1thrboz@gmx.com> - 2021-08-14 11:20 +0200
Re: HP plat fair with drivers? Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2021-08-14 18:20 +0200
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
| From | songbird <songbird@anthive.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 01:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CLOCZ-3Nl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238612 |
John Hasler wrote: ... > No. I was there when it came into use. It definitely represents the > sound of a small object dropping into a large tank with liquid at the > bottom. A septic tank, for example. It was common to respond to a > particularly asinine article with the one-word followup "plonk". having been reading usenet since before the great renaming it was a term that i haven't used often. i found out years ago that i just don't have the energy any more to get that mad about something on-line. the n key is many fewer keystrokes than *plonk*. :) songbird
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 01:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CLP61-3Wo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238620 |
songbird writes: > i found out years ago that i just don't have the energy any more to > get that mad about something on-line. the n key is many fewer > keystrokes than *plonk*. :) When I find that I'm hitting n every time I see a certain user I killfile them. Saves keystrokes, reduces clutter. It's about boredom, not anger. Of course, as a Gnus user I can killfile (score down, actually) subjects and threads as well. -- John Hasler john@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 02:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CLPIJ-4nP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238620 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 2021-08-13 6:55 p.m., songbird wrote: > John Hasler wrote: > ... >> No. I was there when it came into use. It definitely represents the >> sound of a small object dropping into a large tank with liquid at the >> bottom. A septic tank, for example. It was common to respond to a >> particularly asinine article with the one-word followup "plonk". > > having been reading usenet since before the great renaming > it was a term that i haven't used often. great renaming ? Usenet is not Usenet anymore ? > > i found out years ago that i just don't have the energy any > more to get that mad about something on-line. the n key is > many fewer keystrokes than *plonk*. :) > > > songbird > -- Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside -Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 07:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CLU5H-7ic-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238622 |
On Fri 13 Aug 2021 at 20:21:27 (-0400), Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > On 2021-08-13 6:55 p.m., songbird wrote: > > John Hasler wrote: > > ... > >> No. I was there when it came into use. It definitely represents the > >> sound of a small object dropping into a large tank with liquid at the > >> bottom. A septic tank, for example. It was common to respond to a > >> particularly asinine article with the one-word followup "plonk". > > > > having been reading usenet since before the great renaming > > it was a term that i haven't used often. > great renaming ? > Usenet is not Usenet anymore ? Please, STFW. Cheers, David.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 08:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CLVl8-8aK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238610 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 04:12:10PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > tomas@tuxteam.de [2021-08-13 19:11:43] wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 12:49:34PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > > [...] > >> Plonk ? [...] > > [1] http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/P/plonk.html > > How odd. I always assumed that it was the comic-strip style > representation of the sound of hanging up the phone abruptly. But... Usenet was /before/ 'phone, wasn't it? ;-P Cheers - t
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 14:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CM17c-3Fo-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238624 |
tomas writes: > But... Usenet was /before/ 'phone, wasn't it? Yup. Back in the 1860s we did UUCP over manual telegraph. Earlier yet we used heliograph. Signal fires on hilltops were slow, but worked. And, of course, pigeons. -- John Hasler john@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 14:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] 1149 (was: lonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list)) |
| Message-ID | <CM1gR-3Jh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238635 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 07:37:00AM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > tomas writes: > > But... Usenet was /before/ 'phone, wasn't it? > > Yup. Back in the 1860s we did UUCP over manual telegraph. Earlier yet > we used heliograph. Signal fires on hilltops were slow, but worked. > And, of course, pigeons. Yes! Pigeons! UUCP over Avian Carrier. Later they shamelessly copied that in rfc1149 [1]. (now seriously: my first Usenet feed actually was over UUCP over... a 14.4k modem) Cheers [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carrier - t
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 15:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] 1149 (was: lonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list)) |
| Message-ID | <CM1JT-48K-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238636 |
On Saturday 14 August 2021 08:44:44 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 07:37:00AM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > > tomas writes: > > > But... Usenet was /before/ 'phone, wasn't it? > > > > Yup. Back in the 1860s we did UUCP over manual telegraph. Earlier > > yet we used heliograph. Signal fires on hilltops were slow, but > > worked. And, of course, pigeons. > > Yes! Pigeons! UUCP over Avian Carrier. Later they shamelessly copied > that in rfc1149 [1]. > > (now seriously: my first Usenet feed actually was over UUCP over... > a 14.4k modem) > > Cheers > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carrier > > - t Chuckle, you were a bit late to that party Tomas. When I first accessed Delphi, I used a 300 baud modem on a trs-80 color computer running os9. That was before Judge Green, and the 16 air miles to the access point was still long distance. So my coco ran my LD bill up over $100 some months. Nobody had 56k modems yet. I was in hog heaven when I got my first 1200 baud modem. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable. - Louis D. Brandeis Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 15:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] CoCo and oldies (was : 1149 (was: lonk / was: Meta: behavior on list)) |
| Message-ID | <CM1Tz-4bK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238638 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 2021-08-14 9:16 a.m., Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 14 August 2021 08:44:44 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 07:37:00AM -0500, John Hasler wrote: >>> tomas writes: >>>> But... Usenet was /before/ 'phone, wasn't it? >>> >>> Yup. Back in the 1860s we did UUCP over manual telegraph. Earlier >>> yet we used heliograph. Signal fires on hilltops were slow, but >>> worked. And, of course, pigeons. >> >> Yes! Pigeons! UUCP over Avian Carrier. Later they shamelessly copied >> that in rfc1149 [1]. >> >> (now seriously: my first Usenet feed actually was over UUCP over... >> a 14.4k modem) >> >> Cheers >> >> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carrier >> >> - t > Chuckle, you were a bit late to that party Tomas. When I first accessed > Delphi, I used a 300 baud modem on a trs-80 color computer running os9. > That was before Judge Green, and the 16 air miles to the access point > was still long distance. So my coco ran my LD bill up over $100 some > months. Nobody had 56k modems yet. I was in hog heaven when I got my > first 1200 baud modem. > You put me back in the "good old times", long time haven't heard of Delphi. Did have a phone coupler (the thing that you put the handset over and would dial manually) for my Commodore SuperPet 900, plus the 1200 bauds modem of my Commodore 64 (later). I remember to have had a CoCo but it was running in plain Basic, don't remember which one I had. > Cheers, Gene Heskett > -- Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside -Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 15:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CM1qx-3N1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238635 |
Le 14/08/2021 à 14:37, John Hasler a écrit : > tomas writes: >> But... Usenet was /before/ 'phone, wasn't it? > Yup. Back in the 1860s we did UUCP over manual telegraph. Earlier yet > we used heliograph. Signal fires on hilltops were slow, but worked. > And, of course, pigeons. I have a secondary MX through UUCP, but over IPv6...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 17:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CM3sl-5uD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238635 |
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 07:37:00 -0500
John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> wrote:
> tomas writes:
> > But... Usenet was /before/ 'phone, wasn't it?
>
> Yup. Back in the 1860s we did UUCP over manual telegraph. Earlier
> yet we used heliograph. Signal fires on hilltops were slow, but
> worked. And, of course, pigeons.
Don't forget IP over drums, and of course IP over lanterns in church
steeples ("Two if by sea", etc.)
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 21:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CM7cC-7Ra-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238640 |
On 14/08/2021 16:08, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 07:37:00 -0500
> John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> wrote:
>
>> tomas writes:
>>> But... Usenet was /before/ 'phone, wasn't it?
>> Yup. Back in the 1860s we did UUCP over manual telegraph. Earlier
>> yet we used heliograph. Signal fires on hilltops were slow, but
>> worked. And, of course, pigeons.
> Don't forget IP over drums, and of course IP over lanterns in church
> steeples ("Two if by sea", etc.)
>
Please take this shit off list!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--
Michael Howard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 21:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CM7vX-7Xh-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238649 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi,
On 2021-08-14 2:53 p.m., Michael Howard wrote:
> On 14/08/2021 16:08, Charles Curley wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 07:37:00 -0500
>> John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> wrote:
>>
>>> tomas writes:
>>>> But... Usenet was /before/ 'phone, wasn't it?
>>> Yup. Back in the 1860s we did UUCP over manual telegraph. Earlier
>>> yet we used heliograph. Signal fires on hilltops were slow, but
>>> worked. And, of course, pigeons.
>> Don't forget IP over drums, and of course IP over lanterns in church
>> steeples ("Two if by sea", etc.)
>>
>
> Please take this shit off list!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
rarely seen someone who express himself in a so good manner !
teaching by example, does this ever come to your mind ?
--
Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside
-Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 21:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CM7FD-80j-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238650 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 14/08/2021 20:25, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-08-14 2:53 p.m., Michael Howard wrote:
>> On 14/08/2021 16:08, Charles Curley wrote:
>>> On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 07:37:00 -0500
>>> John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> tomas writes:
>>>>> But... Usenet was /before/ 'phone, wasn't it?
>>>> Yup. Back in the 1860s we did UUCP over manual telegraph. Earlier
>>>> yet we used heliograph. Signal fires on hilltops were slow, but
>>>> worked. And, of course, pigeons.
>>> Don't forget IP over drums, and of course IP over lanterns in church
>>> steeples ("Two if by sea", etc.)
>>>
>> Please take this shit off list!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
> rarely seen someone who express himself in a so good manner !
>
> teaching by example, does this ever come to your mind ?
Give the normal amongst us a break. This stuff is NOT debian, it is
social ineptitude and it has to stop.
Form yourselves a chat group somewhere, just NOT here. Please?
--
Michael Howard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marco Möller <talby@debianlists.mobilxpress.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 21:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CM7FE-80j-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238651 |
On 14.08.21 21:35, Michael Howard wrote: > Give the normal amongst us a break. This stuff is NOT debian, it is > social ineptitude and it has to stop. > > Form yourselves a chat group somewhere, just NOT here. Please? > > -- > Michael Howard. > +1 --- Marco
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Curt <curty@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 22:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CM7YZ-87f-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238649 |
On 2021-08-14, Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> wrote:
> On 14/08/2021 16:08, Charles Curley wrote:
>> Don't forget IP over drums, and of course IP over lanterns in church
>> steeples ("Two if by sea", etc.)
>>
>
> Please take this shit off list!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
IP overwrought, is that it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 22:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CM7YZ-87f-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238656 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 14/08/2021 20:51, Curt wrote:
> On 2021-08-14, Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 14/08/2021 16:08, Charles Curley wrote:
>>> Don't forget IP over drums, and of course IP over lanterns in church
>>> steeples ("Two if by sea", etc.)
>>>
>> Please take this shit off list!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
> IP overwrought, is that it?
>
>
>
No
--
Michael Howard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 23:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Plonk (wss: Meta: behavior on list) |
| Message-ID | <CM9o5-FZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238656 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 2021-08-14 3:51 p.m., Curt wrote:
> On 2021-08-14, Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 14/08/2021 16:08, Charles Curley wrote:
>
>>> Don't forget IP over drums, and of course IP over lanterns in church
>>> steeples ("Two if by sea", etc.)
>>>
>>
>> Please take this shit off list!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>
> IP overwrought, is that it?
>
>
>
He want to take the IP over the list ?
IPoL ?
--
Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside
-Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deloptes <emanoil.kotsev@deloptes.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-13 22:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Meta: behavior on list |
| Message-ID | <CLM89-2fn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238602 |
Dan Ritter wrote: > There is no way in which the gender of any participant in > debian-users is relevant. Nor their sexuality, religion, skin > color, national origin, or even the fact that they use other > operating systems from time to time. It is not about the gender but the attitude, capice? -- FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-14 13:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Meta: behavior on list |
| Message-ID | <CLZyp-2xO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238602 |
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 12:41:40PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > deloptes wrote: > > @Brian communication with Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside is meaningless and > > a waste of time. > > You should have stopped here. > > > > I even had to google her, because I had the feeling I talk to a troll. I > > think she is extreme left ... lost in gendering and so on somewhere in > > French Canada, but I do not have any evidence for that. However the > > information I found > > At this point, you crossed the line in my head. > > There is no way in which the gender of any participant in > debian-users is relevant. Nor their sexuality, religion, skin > color, national origin, or even the fact that they use other > operating systems from time to time. See also the FAQ I post each month :) > > There are occasionally issues that relate to where someone is > operating a computer -- WiFi bands, hardware availability, censorship > issues come to mind -- but none of those are relevant in the > current discussion, so whatever your problem with Canadians, > Québécois(e) or Francophones is, I suggest that you forget about > it until it becomes relevant. > > Finally, if someone doesn't bring up their politics on-list, > there's no call for you to bring up their politics on-list. You > can silently avoid helping as much as you please. > > And in conclusion, plonk! > > -dsr- > Be considerate to each other. Be polite - be helpful. There's no need to dig into people's backgrounds to try and work out why they annoy you - get over it and treat them well. When you annoy them, with luck, they'll do the same. Debian is a HUGE community - every political viewpoint, every religious viewpoint, shades of sexual orientation and identity, shades of gender - often the only thing that unites us is that we use/are interested in/ keep up with Debian. That doesn't mean to say that personality doesn't come up - just that it's a secondary consideration. Stick around for a while and you discover what are hot topics - what you can say to push someone's crumple buttons. [Everyone has a button/hot topic that sets them going: your attitude/your tone or the words you use might remind them of an unfortunate situation/ bad experiences or just life experiences. Hit on it accidentally and you can make them want to fight you/burst into tears or whatever - unexpected quite often.] Don't set out to punch people's crumple buttons: hit them deliberately and some people double over just as much as if you'd hit them in the stomach Trying to make Debian a better place starts one post at a time. That's one of the reasons why I volunteer for the Debian community team. [And yes, this can readily be seen as pious politcal correctness liberal bullshit and irrelevant and you can all ignore it - until the time when it suddenly becomes important to you on an issue you care about - or you appreciate someone more for trying to help you when you're down.] And now back to tech stuff - and a release to get out :) All best, Andy C
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web