Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #238576 > unrolled thread

Root location

Started byGunnar Gervin <dofeelok@gmail.com>
First post2021-08-13 10:40 +0200
Last post2021-08-14 11:30 +0200
Articles 11 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user


Contents

  Root location Gunnar Gervin <dofeelok@gmail.com> - 2021-08-13 10:40 +0200
    Re: Root location deloptes <emanoil.kotsev@deloptes.org> - 2021-08-13 14:00 +0200
      Re: Root location Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-08-13 14:10 +0200
        Re: Root location Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-08-13 15:10 +0200
        Re: Root location Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2021-08-13 18:00 +0200
        Re: Root location Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-13 18:10 +0200
    Re: Root location Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2021-08-13 14:40 +0200
      Re: Root location Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-13 18:10 +0200
    Re: Root location Gunnar Gervin <dofeelok@gmail.com> - 2021-08-13 18:10 +0200
      Re: Root location Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-13 18:20 +0200
        Re: Root location "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-08-14 11:30 +0200

#238576 — Root location

FromGunnar Gervin <dofeelok@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-13 10:40 +0200
SubjectRoot location
Message-ID<CLATn-3FP-9@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

I tried to partition with rEFInd because Linux Mint 19 i386 xfce 32bit
worked with EFI. In hope to upgrade to x86-64bit. After it looked like all
good, I went out, thinking it was OK. But installation came back to start,
asking me to choose put boot in Mbr, Partition with Gparted or Abort. Mbr
resulted in warning. Gparted offered grub bios, took that, result was root
in /target
instead of in /dev/sda1
Now:
lsblk
sda1 148G  part  /
sda3  999M  part

Looks okay;
sda1 as root
sda3 as swap

Better I try boot
Then see what happens.
(Later upgrade to 64bit if I can).
BR,
Gunnar

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#238586

Fromdeloptes <emanoil.kotsev@deloptes.org>
Date2021-08-13 14:00 +0200
Message-ID<CLE0V-5Gy-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#238576
Gunnar Gervin wrote:

> Better I try boot
> Then see what happens.

very good idea

> (Later upgrade to 64bit if I can).

I am not sure if you can upgrade 32 to 64bit OS. AFAIK you reinstall


-- 
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#238588

FromGreg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org>
Date2021-08-13 14:10 +0200
Message-ID<CLEaB-5Z4-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#238586
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 01:53:44PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Gunnar Gervin wrote:
> 
> > (Later upgrade to 64bit if I can).
> 
> I am not sure if you can upgrade 32 to 64bit OS. AFAIK you reinstall

This is called a "crossgrade" sometimes (a portmanteau of "cross" and
"upgrade").  It is NOT supported.  However, some advanced people have
done it.  There's a wiki page about it.

I've never done it.  I've never even ATTEMPTED it.  I would not
recommend it, particularly to a novice.

If the OP wants to run a 64-bit OS in the end, they should install a
64-bit OS to begin with.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#238590

FromJoe <joe@jretrading.com>
Date2021-08-13 15:10 +0200
Message-ID<CLF6F-6A5-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#238588
On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 08:00:35 -0400
Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 01:53:44PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
 
> > 
> > I am not sure if you can upgrade 32 to 64bit OS. AFAIK you
> > reinstall  
> 
> This is called a "crossgrade" sometimes (a portmanteau of "cross" and
> "upgrade").  It is NOT supported.  However, some advanced people have
> done it.  There's a wiki page about it.
> 
> I've never done it.  I've never even ATTEMPTED it.  I would not
> recommend it, particularly to a novice.
> 
> If the OP wants to run a 64-bit OS in the end, they should install a
> 64-bit OS to begin with.
> 

I had a go with the etch->lenny upgrade, but the whole thing got well
out of hand and I gave up.

-- 
Joe

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#238595

FromSteve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
Date2021-08-13 18:00 +0200
Message-ID<CLHLb-83C-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#238588
Greg Wooledge wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 01:53:44PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
>> Gunnar Gervin wrote:
>> 
>> > (Later upgrade to 64bit if I can).
>> 
>> I am not sure if you can upgrade 32 to 64bit OS. AFAIK you reinstall
>
>This is called a "crossgrade" sometimes (a portmanteau of "cross" and
>"upgrade").  It is NOT supported.  However, some advanced people have
>done it.  There's a wiki page about it.
>
>I've never done it.  I've never even ATTEMPTED it.  I would not
>recommend it, particularly to a novice.
>
>If the OP wants to run a 64-bit OS in the end, they should install a
>64-bit OS to begin with.

We finally now have a cross-grading tool in Debian:

  https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/debian-crossgrader

written by Kevin Wu as a GSoC project last year. It has worked well
for me in testing!

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
"We're the technical experts.  We were hired so that management could
 ignore our recommendations and tell us how to do our jobs."  -- Mike Andrews

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#238596

FromPolyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com>
Date2021-08-13 18:10 +0200
Message-ID<CLHUS-8m4-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#238588

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,

On 2021-08-13 8:00 a.m., Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 01:53:44PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
>> Gunnar Gervin wrote:
>>
>>> (Later upgrade to 64bit if I can).
>>
>> I am not sure if you can upgrade 32 to 64bit OS. AFAIK you reinstall
> 
> This is called a "crossgrade" sometimes (a portmanteau of "cross" and
> "upgrade").  It is NOT supported.  However, some advanced people have
> done it.  There's a wiki page about it.
> 
> I've never done it.  I've never even ATTEMPTED it.  I would not
> recommend it, particularly to a novice.
> 
Seems to be quite complex, first adding x64 architecture to your system,
then dealing with the problem that some base package can only be
installed in one architecture at a time, afterward there will be the
configuration part plus kernel.

Seems to me much easier to reinstall (after user data backup) than doing
a crossgrade.
> If the OP wants to run a 64-bit OS in the end, they should install a
> 64-bit OS to begin with.
> 

-- 
Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside
-Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#238589

FromHenning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com>
Date2021-08-13 14:40 +0200
Message-ID<CLEDE-68o-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#238576
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:15:10AM +0300, Gunnar Gervin wrote:
> I tried to partition with rEFInd because Linux Mint 19 i386 xfce 32bit
> worked with EFI. In hope to upgrade to x86-64bit. After it looked like all
> good, I went out, thinking it was OK. But installation came back to start,
> asking me to choose put boot in Mbr, Partition with Gparted or Abort. Mbr
> resulted in warning. Gparted offered grub bios, took that, result was root
> in /target
> instead of in /dev/sda1
> Now:
> lsblk
> sda1 148G  part  /
> sda3  999M  part
> 
> Looks okay;
> sda1 as root
> sda3 as swap
> 
> Better I try boot
> Then see what happens.
> (Later upgrade to 64bit if I can).
> BR,
> Gunnar

Hello,
I think you are making this way too difficult for yourself.
Maybe you are following some recipes you found through google.
These are most likely outdated and it is much simpler today.
I converted a number of Macs into linux machines, including
one powerpc one. And maybe ten years ago you had to handle
with refid, these days you just can use the installer and
almost everything (except the driver for the wifi cards)
just works.

Please post the actual cpu this machine has. Then we can tell you
what to do to install debian on that machine.
Please tell us also about the amount of memory installed.


-H


-- 
Henning Follmann           | hfollmann@itcfollmann.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#238597

FromPolyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com>
Date2021-08-13 18:10 +0200
Message-ID<CLHUS-8m4-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#238589

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,

On 2021-08-13 8:33 a.m., Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:15:10AM +0300, Gunnar Gervin wrote:
>> I tried to partition with rEFInd because Linux Mint 19 i386 xfce 32bit
>> worked with EFI. In hope to upgrade to x86-64bit. After it looked like all
>> good, I went out, thinking it was OK. But installation came back to start,
>> asking me to choose put boot in Mbr, Partition with Gparted or Abort. Mbr
>> resulted in warning. Gparted offered grub bios, took that, result was root
>> in /target
>> instead of in /dev/sda1
>> Now:
>> lsblk
>> sda1 148G  part  /
>> sda3  999M  part
>>
>> Looks okay;
>> sda1 as root
>> sda3 as swap
>>
>> Better I try boot
>> Then see what happens.
>> (Later upgrade to 64bit if I can).
>> BR,
>> Gunnar
> 
> Hello,
> I think you are making this way too difficult for yourself.
> Maybe you are following some recipes you found through google.
> These are most likely outdated and it is much simpler today.
> I converted a number of Macs into linux machines, including
> one powerpc one. And maybe ten years ago you had to handle
> with refid, these days you just can use the installer and
> almost everything (except the driver for the wifi cards)
> just works.
> 
> Please post the actual cpu this machine has. Then we can tell you
> what to do to install debian on that machine.
> Please tell us also about the amount of memory installed.
> 
All this can probably be found in a previous thread. But I do remember
this is not the first thing the question about "What are you running
under" and that the answer seem hard to get.

If my memory is good it's a MacBook but I don't think we ever got the
CPU type or the amount of memory installed.

Looking at the size of the hard drive (which was installed by himself,
Toshiba brand) we normally get a good idea about the age of the computer
if it's the original hard drive. Not the case this time...

Maybe running hwinfo --all > hwinfo.txt and after pasting the content of
hwinfo.txt could be of some help.

> 
> -H
> 
> 

-- 
Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside
-Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#238599

FromGunnar Gervin <dofeelok@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-13 18:10 +0200
Message-ID<CLHUS-8m4-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#238576

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Thx to Polyna especially, for telling me that I have x86-64 machine. Do not
yet know x86 part but 64bit it certainly is.
In Mint 32bit i686 still. but now
I know a little bit (!) more about this machine, how chmod is not wise to
use, etc. Kinda fun, cos Mint lets me in again. So far.
My Mini PC Windows 10 128GB SSD is in the customs here (been there 6
weeks..), great. Hope I can use the screen on this for a week or two..
I will surely stay in Mint, that is without root, chroot, chmod etc until I
have a tiny clue what all this is doing with my computer. Wild child still,
weird.
Gunnar

On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 at 09:45, Keith Bainbridge <keithrboz@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 13/8/21 18:15, Gunnar Gervin wrote:
> > I tried to partition with rEFInd because Linux Mint 19 i386 xfce 32bit
> > worked with EFI. In hope to upgrade to x86-64bit. After it looked like
> > all good, I went out, thinking it was OK. But installation came back to
> > start, asking me to choose put boot in Mbr, Partition with Gparted or
> > Abort. Mbr resulted in warning. Gparted offered grub bios, took that,
> > result was root in /target
> > instead of in /dev/sda1
> > Now:
> > lsblk
> > sda1 148G  part  /
> > sda3  999M  part
> >
> > Looks okay;
> > sda1 as root
> > sda3 as swap
> >
> > Better I try boot
> > Then see what happens.
> > (Later upgrade to 64bit if I can).
> > BR,
> > Gunnar
>
>
> Gunnar
>
> I suggest you stick with Mint until you get a better understanding of
> how things work.
>
>
> Try testing in virtual machine
>
> --
> All the best
>
> Keith Bainbridge
>
> keith.bainbridge.3216@gmail.com
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#238601

FromPolyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com>
Date2021-08-13 18:20 +0200
Message-ID<CLI4x-8p8-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#238599

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,

On 2021-08-13 11:47 a.m., Gunnar Gervin wrote:
> Thx to Polyna especially, for telling me that I have x86-64 machine. Do
> not yet know x86 part but 64bit it certainly is.
> In Mint 32bit i686 still. but now
> I know a little bit (!) more about this machine, how chmod is not wise
> to use, etc. Kinda fun, cos Mint lets me in again. So far.
> My Mini PC Windows 10 128GB SSD is in the customs here (been there 6
> weeks..), great. Hope I can use the screen on this for a week or two..
Earlier you said you are running a computer based on Mac ?

Wasn't the case ?

It's hard to follow this thread...

> I will surely stay in Mint, that is without root, chroot, chmod etc
> until I have a tiny clue what all this is doing with my computer. Wild
> child still, weird.
> Gunnar
> 
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 at 09:45, Keith Bainbridge <keithrboz@gmail.com
> <mailto:keithrboz@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 13/8/21 18:15, Gunnar Gervin wrote:
>     > I tried to partition with rEFInd because Linux Mint 19 i386 xfce
>     32bit
>     > worked with EFI. In hope to upgrade to x86-64bit. After it looked
>     like
>     > all good, I went out, thinking it was OK. But installation came
>     back to
>     > start, asking me to choose put boot in Mbr, Partition with Gparted or
>     > Abort. Mbr resulted in warning. Gparted offered grub bios, took that,
>     > result was root in /target
>     > instead of in /dev/sda1
>     > Now:
>     > lsblk
>     > sda1 148G  part  /
>     > sda3  999M  part
>     >
>     > Looks okay;
>     > sda1 as root
>     > sda3 as swap
>     >
>     > Better I try boot
>     > Then see what happens.
>     > (Later upgrade to 64bit if I can).
>     > BR,
>     > Gunnar
> 
> 
>     Gunnar
> 
>     I suggest you stick with Mint until you get a better understanding of
>     how things work.
> 
> 
>     Try testing in virtual machine
> 
>     -- 
>     All the best
> 
>     Keith Bainbridge
> 
>     keith.bainbridge.3216@gmail.com <mailto:keith.bainbridge.3216@gmail.com>
> 

-- 
Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside
-Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#238626

From"Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com>
Date2021-08-14 11:30 +0200
Message-ID<CLY9j-1IL-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#238601
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 12:11:37PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2021-08-13 11:47 a.m., Gunnar Gervin wrote:
> > Thx to Polyna especially, for telling me that I have x86-64 machine. Do
> > not yet know x86 part but 64bit it certainly is.
> > In Mint 32bit i686 still. but now
> > I know a little bit (!) more about this machine, how chmod is not wise
> > to use, etc. Kinda fun, cos Mint lets me in again. So far.
> > My Mini PC Windows 10 128GB SSD is in the customs here (been there 6
> > weeks..), great. Hope I can use the screen on this for a week or two..
> Earlier you said you are running a computer based on Mac ?
> 
> Wasn't the case ?
> 
> It's hard to follow this thread...
> 
> > I will surely stay in Mint, that is without root, chroot, chmod etc
> > until I have a tiny clue what all this is doing with my computer. Wild
> > child still, weird.
> > Gunnar
> > 
> > On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 at 09:45, Keith Bainbridge <keithrboz@gmail.com
> > <mailto:keithrboz@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > 
> >     On 13/8/21 18:15, Gunnar Gervin wrote:
> >     > I tried to partition with rEFInd because Linux Mint 19 i386 xfce
> >     32bit
> >     > worked with EFI. In hope to upgrade to x86-64bit. After it looked
> >     like
> >     > all good, I went out, thinking it was OK. But installation came
> >     back to
> >     > start, asking me to choose put boot in Mbr, Partition with Gparted or
> >     > Abort. Mbr resulted in warning. Gparted offered grub bios, took that,
> >     > result was root in /target
> >     > instead of in /dev/sda1
> >     > Now:
> >     > lsblk
> >     > sda1 148G  part  /
> >     > sda3  999M  part
> >     >
> >     > Looks okay;
> >     > sda1 as root
> >     > sda3 as swap
> >     >
> >     > Better I try boot
> >     > Then see what happens.
> >     > (Later upgrade to 64bit if I can).
> >     > BR,
> >     > Gunnar
> > 
> > 
> >     Gunnar
> > 
> >     I suggest you stick with Mint until you get a better understanding of
> >     how things work.
> > 
> > 
> >     Try testing in virtual machine
> > 
> >     -- 
> >     All the best
> > 
> >     Keith Bainbridge
> > 
> >     keith.bainbridge.3216@gmail.com <mailto:keith.bainbridge.3216@gmail.com>
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside
> -Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development
> 

>From what I recall: Gunnar has an old (2006/2007) macbook with intel core
duo, 3GB of RAM and an SSD he's put in himself.

Macs of that age had difficulty reading some CD media (because of difficulty
with the El Torito format??) . There is specific Mac media under amd64 (so 
64 bit) CPU to deal with this fact. The transition period for when Macs could
read "normal" media is around that time, I think, so this is a special case. 

The CD team don't have the hardware to test this specific image, as far as I
know.

I seem to recall that Gunnar may hve more than that - he may have a later
Macbook undergoing repair.

Gunnar: Please try with the mac specific amd64 image, I've pointed you to
in other threads, else try with the standard amd64 image. 

Getting 32 bit media to run badly is no great help. ReFind is definitely
_not_ recommended. Please simplify this to one install that works, maybe.

All the very best, as ever,

Andy Cater

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web