Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #238440 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-08-10 19:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-08-31 02:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 15 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> - 2021-08-10 19:40 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2021-08-10 20:00 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> - 2021-08-10 20:00 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> - 2021-08-10 20:10 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-08-11 05:40 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2021-08-10 20:10 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> - 2021-08-10 20:20 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com> - 2021-08-10 21:10 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-08-10 20:10 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2021-08-11 00:30 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-08-11 01:00 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> - 2021-08-11 01:10 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded Cindy Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-11 10:10 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-08-30 21:00 +0200
Re: apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> - 2021-08-31 02:00 +0200
| From | Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-10 19:40 +0200 |
| Subject | apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded |
| Message-ID | <CKDTj-7n0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
How can I determine what the "1 not upgraded" package might be? ~$ apt-get update Hit:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease Hit:2 http://security.debian.org bullseye-security InRelease Hit:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease Reading package lists... Done ~$ apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Calculating upgrade... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. ~$ apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Calculating upgrade... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. -Jim P.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-10 20:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CKEcF-7tM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238440 |
On 8/10/2021 7:32 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > How can I determine what the "1 not upgraded" package might be? > > > ~$ apt-get update > Hit:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease > Hit:2 http://security.debian.org bullseye-security InRelease > Hit:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease > Reading package lists... Done > > ~$ apt-get upgrade > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Calculating upgrade... Done > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > > ~$ apt-get dist-upgrade > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Calculating upgrade... Done > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > $ apt-get -sV full-upgrade -s = simulate -V = verbose -- John Doe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-10 20:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CKEcF-7tM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238443 |
On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 19:49 +0200, john doe wrote: > On 8/10/2021 7:32 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > How can I determine what the "1 not upgraded" package might be? > > > > > > ~$ apt-get update > > Hit:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease > > Hit:2 http://security.debian.org bullseye-security InRelease > > Hit:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease > > Reading package lists... Done > > > > ~$ apt-get upgrade > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree... Done > > Calculating upgrade... Done > > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > > > > > ~$ apt-get dist-upgrade > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree... Done > > Calculating upgrade... Done > > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > > > $ apt-get -sV full-upgrade > > > -s = simulate > -V = verbose Thanks, unfortunately still nothing. :( ~$ apt-get -sV full-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Calculating upgrade... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. I'm beginning to wonder if this is just a bug in apt-get, I know of nothing on this small server that has a pending upgrade. -Jim P.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-10 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CKEml-7Mq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238444 |
On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 14:00 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 01:57:13PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > ~$ apt-get -sV full-upgrade > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree... Done > > Calculating upgrade... Done > > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > Have you tried Google yet? > > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/615676/0-upgraded-0-newly-installed-0-to-remove-and-1-not-upgraded-how-can-i-upgrade > > https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/debian-26/%271-package-not-upgraded%27-conundrum-4175620661/ > > Perhaps one of those will point the way. (What do you have pinned, > and what third-party repositories do you have configured?) > Nothing pinned. I did see the first link you posted, but not the 2nd one, although neither seems to apply to what I'm experiencing. No pinning, no custom apt settings, etc. $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list deb [trusted=yes] http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye main deb [trusted=yes] http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates main deb [trusted=yes] http://security.debian.org bullseye-security main $ apt-get clean && apt-get update && apt-get upgrade && apt-get -sV full-upgrade Hit:1 http://security.debian.org bullseye-security InRelease Hit:2 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease Hit:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease Reading package lists... Done Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Calculating upgrade... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Calculating upgrade... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Thanks for at least offering suggestings, etc. -Jim P.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-11 05:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CKNfX-4RY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238446 |
On Tue 10 Aug 2021 at 14:09:27 (-0400), Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 14:00 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 01:57:13PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > > ~$ apt-get -sV full-upgrade > > > Reading package lists... Done > > > Building dependency tree... Done > > > Calculating upgrade... Done > > > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > > > Have you tried Google yet? > > > > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/615676/0-upgraded-0-newly-installed-0-to-remove-and-1-not-upgraded-how-can-i-upgrade > > > > https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/debian-26/%271-package-not-upgraded%27-conundrum-4175620661/ > > > > Perhaps one of those will point the way. (What do you have pinned, > > and what third-party repositories do you have configured?) > > > > Nothing pinned. I did see the first link you posted, but not the 2nd > one, although neither seems to apply to what I'm experiencing. No > pinning, no custom apt settings, etc. > > $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list > deb [trusted=yes] http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye main > deb [trusted=yes] http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates main > deb [trusted=yes] http://security.debian.org bullseye-security main deb [trusted=yes] http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main is what I would expect to see here. (I don't have a system availble to test the effect of omitting debian-security) > $ apt-get clean && apt-get update && apt-get upgrade && apt-get -sV > full-upgrade > Hit:1 http://security.debian.org bullseye-security InRelease > Hit:2 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease > Hit:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease > Reading package lists... Done > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Calculating upgrade... Done > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Calculating upgrade... Done > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > Thanks for at least offering suggestings, etc. Cheers, David.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-10 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CKEml-7Mq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238444 |
On 8/10/2021 7:57 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 19:49 +0200, john doe wrote: >> On 8/10/2021 7:32 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: >>> How can I determine what the "1 not upgraded" package might be? >>> >>> >>> ~$ apt-get update >>> Hit:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease >>> Hit:2 http://security.debian.org bullseye-security InRelease >>> Hit:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease >>> Reading package lists... Done >>> >>> ~$ apt-get upgrade >>> Reading package lists... Done >>> Building dependency tree... Done >>> Calculating upgrade... Done >>> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. >>> >>> >>> ~$ apt-get dist-upgrade >>> Reading package lists... Done >>> Building dependency tree... Done >>> Calculating upgrade... Done >>> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. >>> >> >> $ apt-get -sV full-upgrade >> >> >> -s = simulate >> -V = verbose > > Thanks, unfortunately still nothing. :( > > ~$ apt-get -sV full-upgrade > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Calculating upgrade... Done > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > > I'm beginning to wonder if this is just a bug in apt-get, I know of > nothing on this small server that has a pending upgrade. > As the cmd works for me I'm not sure this is a bug in 'apt-get' but maybe a pkg on 'hold'. -- John Doe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-10 20:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CKEw1-7Pj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238447 |
On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 20:03 +0200, john doe wrote: > On 8/10/2021 7:57 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 19:49 +0200, john doe wrote: > > > On 8/10/2021 7:32 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > > > How can I determine what the "1 not upgraded" package might be? > > > > > > > > > > > > ~$ apt-get update > > > > Hit:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease > > > > Hit:2 http://security.debian.org bullseye-security InRelease > > > > Hit:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease > > > > Reading package lists... Done > > > > > > > > ~$ apt-get upgrade > > > > Reading package lists... Done > > > > Building dependency tree... Done > > > > Calculating upgrade... Done > > > > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > > > > > > > > > > > ~$ apt-get dist-upgrade > > > > Reading package lists... Done > > > > Building dependency tree... Done > > > > Calculating upgrade... Done > > > > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > > > > > > > > > $ apt-get -sV full-upgrade > > > > > > > > > -s = simulate > > > -V = verbose > > > > Thanks, unfortunately still nothing. :( > > > > ~$ apt-get -sV full-upgrade > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree... Done > > Calculating upgrade... Done > > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > > > > > I'm beginning to wonder if this is just a bug in apt-get, I know of > > nothing on this small server that has a pending upgrade. > > > > As the cmd works for me I'm not sure this is a bug in 'apt-get' but > maybe a pkg on 'hold'. No pining, nothing on hold that I can see, no custom config, etc. apt- get works for me, i can install and --purge remove, etc, just that one dangling "not upgraded" status that befuddles me. Thanks, -Jim P.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-10 21:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CKFip-8l9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238449 |
Hello, If for example you have set up unattended-upgrades and installed apt- listbugs, then when unattended-upgrades runs, apt-listbugs automatically pins (-30000) upgradable packages that are affected by bugs in order for them to be hold until a fix. They are automatically de-pinned when bugs are fixed. Such pinned packages appear in /etc/apt/preferences.d/apt-listbugs (look at apt-listbugs manpage for details)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-10 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CKEml-7Mq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238444 |
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 01:57:13PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: > ~$ apt-get -sV full-upgrade > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Calculating upgrade... Done > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Have you tried Google yet? https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/615676/0-upgraded-0-newly-installed-0-to-remove-and-1-not-upgraded-how-can-i-upgrade https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/debian-26/%271-package-not-upgraded%27-conundrum-4175620661/ Perhaps one of those will point the way. (What do you have pinned, and what third-party repositories do you have configured?)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-11 00:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CKIpX-1Tm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238440 |
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 03:32, Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> wrote: > apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded > How can I determine what the "1 not upgraded" package might be? Hi, I dunno if this message will be of any use, because other suggestions indicate that this might be due to pinning or other issues that I have no knowledge of. But something simple that I would check in this situation would be that I would run interactive 'aptitude' as root. If it starts up with its "Upgradeable Packages" top line highlighted then you could press the '[' key to expand that line and it will show the packages in question. If not then just press 'q' to close the tab and quit. By the way, I'm giving the keyboard hints in case you have not used it before, to save you reading the manual,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-11 01:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CKISZ-24R-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238465 |
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 08:27:03AM +1000, David wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 03:32, Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> wrote: > > > apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded > > > How can I determine what the "1 not upgraded" package might be? > > Hi, I dunno if this message will be of any use, because other > suggestions indicate that this might be due to pinning or other > issues that I have no knowledge of. The OP claimed they have nothing pinned, but presented no evidence to support this claim. Perhaps they thought that because they didn't explicitly *pin* anything themselves, there must not be anything pinned on their system. So why bother looking? They should at least look. grep -ri pin /etc/apt would be a reasonable starting point. (Also, catting /etc/apt/sources.list is not sufficient to show the absence of third-party repositories. There's also a sources.list.d directory.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-11 01:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CKJ2F-2nB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238468 |
On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 18:59 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 08:27:03AM +1000, David wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 03:32, Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> wrote: > > > > > apt-upgrade (Bullseye) shows 1 pkg not upgraded > > > > > How can I determine what the "1 not upgraded" package might be? > > > > Hi, I dunno if this message will be of any use, because other > > suggestions indicate that this might be due to pinning or other > > issues that I have no knowledge of. > > The OP claimed they have nothing pinned, but presented no evidence to > support this claim. Perhaps they thought that because they didn't > explicitly *pin* anything themselves, there must not be anything > pinned on their system. So why bother looking? > > They should at least look. I did. > > grep -ri pin /etc/apt That's exactly how I did look. > > would be a reasonable starting point. > > (Also, catting /etc/apt/sources.list is not sufficient to show the > absence of third-party repositories. There's also a sources.list.d > directory.) If there was anything in sources.list.d I would have showed it. Absence of absence is something no one should ponder. -Jim P.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cindy Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-11 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CKRtg-8qT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238470 |
On 8/10/21, Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 18:59 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> >> The OP claimed they have nothing pinned, but presented no evidence to >> support this claim. Perhaps they thought that because they didn't >> explicitly *pin* anything themselves, there must not be anything >> pinned on their system. So why bother looking? >> >> They should at least look. > > I did. > >> >> grep -ri pin /etc/apt > > That's exactly how I did look. What about something that didn't fully upgrade for whatever reason? I haven't encountered that in a few weeks so I'd already forgotten whether it was "apt(-get)" or "dpkg". Quick search brought up this [0]: "dpkg --configure -a" configure all partially installed packages If that has already been tried, my apologies. [0] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch02.en.html See under "2.4.1. Advanced package management operations with commandline" Cindy :) -- Cindy-Sue Causey Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA * runs with birdseed *
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-30 21:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CRUFH-UC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #238440 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Ma, 10 aug 21, 13:32:09, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> How can I determine what the "1 not upgraded" package might be?
>
>
> ~$ apt-get update
> Hit:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease
> Hit:2 http://security.debian.org bullseye-security InRelease
> Hit:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease
> Reading package lists... Done
>
> ~$ apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
>
>
> ~$ apt-get dist-upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
A bit late to the party...
If pinning is the issue, the definitive place to check that is always
the output of 'apt policy' (with no package)[1].
If that doesn't provide any new information you could ask deity ;)
https://lists.debian.org/deity/
[1] It's also a very good way to check your pinning actually works
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-31 02:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CRZm1-43W-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #239468 |
On Mon, 2021-08-30 at 21:53 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Ma, 10 aug 21, 13:32:09, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > How can I determine what the "1 not upgraded" package might be? > > > > > > ~$ apt-get update > > Hit:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease > > Hit:2 http://security.debian.org bullseye-security InRelease > > Hit:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease > > Reading package lists... Done > > > > ~$ apt-get upgrade > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree... Done > > Calculating upgrade... Done > > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > > > > > ~$ apt-get dist-upgrade > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree... Done > > Calculating upgrade... Done > > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > A bit late to the party... > > If pinning is the issue, the definitive place to check that is always > the output of 'apt policy' (with no package)[1]. > > > If that doesn't provide any new information you could ask deity ;) > > https://lists.debian.org/deity/ > > > [1] It's also a very good way to check your pinning actually works There was nothing pinned, but the issue did go away sometime in the week before Bullseye was released. I'm convinced it was a mirror/cache issue. -Jim P.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web