Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #237302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-07-13 12:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-07-13 15:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-07-13 12:30 +0200
Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2021-07-13 15:00 +0200
Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-07-13 15:20 +0200
| From | "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-07-13 12:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates |
| Message-ID | <CAnPR-ij-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 06:55:30PM +0000, Gregory McPherran wrote: > Hi, > > This shows the new security line form as: > DebianBullseye - Debian Wiki<https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBullseye?highlight=%28CategoryRelease%29#New_Features> > deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main > > This shows the new security line form as: > sources.list(5) — apt — Debian unstable — Debian Manpages<https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/apt/sources.list.5.en.html#EXAMPLES> > deb http://security.debian.org bullseye-security main > > Is one of "http://security.debian.org/debian-security" or "http://security.debian.org" the correct format ? > > Or is the "debian-security" portion optional ? > > Thank you, > Greg McPherran > If you're still running Jessie: _please_ take the machine off the Internet / take it out of service to be upgraded. You're more than a year beyond all major securiy support - unless you want to pay for ELTS. Take the opportunity to at least upgrade to Debian 9 and, ideally, 10. Debian 11 should be here inside a month - if you can get to 10, you'll have at least a further year of security support for 10. If you want detailed instructions as to how to go about this, this list will be more than happy to oblige, I'm sure. [Second time in 24 hours: on IRC last night I was chatting with someone in a similar position]. Upgrading between major releases of Debian is almost always feasible and relatively problem free. In that, we score as against some other Linux distributions where the only option is to wipe and reinstall. "I can't upgrade at this time" is fine for maybe a year or even two at the outside: saying this one time after formal security support has gone is substantially less good for you and any other users of the machine. Andy - who is overly tweaked about keeping systems up to date and patched. All best, as ever, Andy Cater
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-07-13 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CAqb0-1Es-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #237302 |
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:22:17AM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >Take the opportunity to at least upgrade to Debian 9 and, ideally, 10. >Debian 11 should be here inside a month - if you can get to 10, you'll >have at least a further year of security support for 10. Worth noting that skipping releases when upgrading isn't supported, so there's no advantage to waiting for the next one--you'll still have to upgrade in order.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-07-13 15:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CAqum-20A-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #237310 |
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:52:18AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:22:17AM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > Take the opportunity to at least upgrade to Debian 9 and, ideally, 10. > > Debian 11 should be here inside a month - if you can get to 10, you'll > > have at least a further year of security support for 10. > > Worth noting that skipping releases when upgrading isn't supported, so > there's no advantage to waiting for the next one--you'll still have to > upgrade in order. So: havng done this - 7 - 8 - 9 on an old machine at work was not too difficult if you take it steadily. You face at least two changes to get it oldoldstable soon :( Andy C >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web