Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #229027 > unrolled thread

An apt repository has changed its key

Started byBob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com>
First post2020-11-24 20:30 +0100
Last post2020-11-25 21:20 +0100
Articles 10 — 7 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user


Contents

  An apt repository has changed its key  Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2020-11-24 20:30 +0100
    Re: An apt repository has changed its key john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2020-11-24 20:40 +0100
    Re: An apt repository has changed its key "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2020-11-24 20:40 +0100
      Re: An apt repository has changed its key Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2020-11-24 21:00 +0100
        Re: An apt repository has changed its key Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-11-24 21:10 +0100
          Re: An apt repository has changed its key Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2020-11-24 21:20 +0100
            Re: An apt repository has changed its key Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2020-11-24 22:10 +0100
            Re: An apt repository has changed its key Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-11-24 23:00 +0100
        Re: An apt repository has changed its key "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2020-11-24 23:20 +0100
    Re: An apt repository has changed its key songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2020-11-25 21:20 +0100

#229027 — An apt repository has changed its key

FromBob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com>
Date2020-11-24 20:30 +0100
SubjectAn apt repository has changed its key
Message-ID<BeMaK-6zY-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
At least, that's my diagnosis.

Here's the pertinent line from an entry in my 
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/:

deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/wireguard/wireguard/ubuntu focal main

Here's the output of 'apt-get update':

--snip--

0% [Working] 0% [Connecting to debian.map.fastlydns.net (2a04:4e4                                                    Err:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/wireguard/wireguard/ubuntu focal InRelease
   403  Forbidden [IP: 91.189.95.83 80]
0% [Connecting to debian.map.fastlydns.net (2a04:4e4                                                    Hit:2 http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease
                                                     0% [Waiting for headers]                        Hit:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster InRelease
[...]

E: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/wireguard/wireguard/ubuntu/dists/focal/InRelease  403  Forbidden [IP: 91.189.95.83 80]
E: The repository 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/wireguard/wireguard/ubuntu focal InRelease' is no longer signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.

--snip--

That apt repo line, above, has worked for months. Iirc, this is 
not my first rodeo with this problem. I forget how I remedied 
it.

I believe apt provides a nice solution for this, that will allow 
me to get the new key onto my machine?

Thank you.

-- 
A person of great honour in Ireland (who was pleased to
stoop so low as to look into my mind) used to tell me that
my mind was like a conjured spirit, that would do mischief
if I did not give it employment.
                                 Jonathan Swift

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#229028

Fromjohn doe <johndoe65534@mail.com>
Date2020-11-24 20:40 +0100
Message-ID<BeMkp-6D7-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#229027
On 11/24/2020 8:19 PM, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> At least, that's my diagnosis.
> 
> Here's the pertinent line from an entry in my /etc/apt/sources.list.d/:
> 
> deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/wireguard/wireguard/ubuntu focal main
> 
> Here's the output of 'apt-get update':
> 
> --snip--
> 
> 0% [Working] 0% [Connecting to debian.map.fastlydns.net 
> (2a04:4e4                                                    Err:1 
> http://ppa.launchpad.net/wireguard/wireguard/ubuntu focal InRelease
>    403  Forbidden [IP: 91.189.95.83 80]
> 0% [Connecting to debian.map.fastlydns.net 
> (2a04:4e4                                                    Hit:2 
> http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease
>                                                      0% [Waiting for 
> headers]                        Hit:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian 
> buster InRelease
> [...]
> 
> E: Failed to fetch 
> http://ppa.launchpad.net/wireguard/wireguard/ubuntu/dists/focal/InRelease  
> 403  Forbidden [IP: 91.189.95.83 80]

Looks like the above IP is being blocked.

-- 
John Doe

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#229029

From"Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com>
Date2020-11-24 20:40 +0100
Message-ID<BeMkq-6D7-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#229027

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 25.11.2020 00:19, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> At least, that's my diagnosis.
>
> Here's the pertinent line from an entry in my /etc/apt/sources.list.d/:
>
> deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/wireguard/wireguard/ubuntu focal main
>
> Here's the output of 'apt-get update':
>
> --snip--
>
> 0% [Working] 0% [Connecting to debian.map.fastlydns.net 
> (2a04:4e4                                                    Err:1 
> http://ppa.launchpad.net/wireguard/wireguard/ubuntu focal InRelease
>   403  Forbidden [IP: 91.189.95.83 80]
> 0% [Connecting to debian.map.fastlydns.net 
> (2a04:4e4                                                    Hit:2 
> http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease
>                                                     0% [Waiting for 
> headers]                        Hit:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian 
> buster InRelease
> [...]
>
> E: Failed to fetch 
> http://ppa.launchpad.net/wireguard/wireguard/ubuntu/dists/focal/InRelease 
> 403  Forbidden [IP: 91.189.95.83 80]
> E: The repository 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/wireguard/wireguard/ubuntu 
> focal InRelease' is no longer signed.
> N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is 
> therefore disabled by default.
> N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user 
> configuration details.
>
> --snip--
>
> That apt repo line, above, has worked for months. Iirc, this is not my 
> first rodeo with this problem. I forget how I remedied it.
>
> I believe apt provides a nice solution for this, that will allow me to 
> get the new key onto my machine?
>
> Thank you.
>
URL doesn't open for me either. It looks like this ppa was removed and 
"now been folded into Ubuntu itself". [1]

[1] https://launchpad.net/~wireguard

-- 
With kindest regards, Alexander.

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#229034

FromBob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com>
Date2020-11-24 21:00 +0100
Message-ID<BeMDM-6JB-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#229029
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:

> URL doesn't open for me either. It looks like this 
> ppa was removed and "now been folded into Ubuntu 
> itself". [1]

> [1] https://launchpad.net/~wireguard

Ah...thanks for finding the way into that rabbit-hole.

Do you think it is permitted for a debian install to point its 
apt-get at a Ubuntu repository?


-- 
A person of great honour in Ireland (who was pleased to
stoop so low as to look into my mind) used to tell me that
my mind was like a conjured spirit, that would do mischief
if I did not give it employment.
                                 Jonathan Swift

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#229035

FromBrian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
Date2020-11-24 21:10 +0100
Message-ID<BeMNr-72m-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#229034
On Tue 24 Nov 2020 at 14:56:46 -0500, Bob Bernstein wrote:

> Do you think it is permitted for a debian install to point its apt-get at a
> Ubuntu repository?

It is permitted! You get to keep any broken bits, of course!

-- 
Brian.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#229037

FromBob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com>
Date2020-11-24 21:20 +0100
Message-ID<BeMX8-75w-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#229035
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Brian wrote:

> It is permitted! You get to keep any broken bits, of course!

Hrrmm...I read your observation as a cautionary tale. Perhaps 
I need to investigate this a bit further, with, for example, the 
vendor of the application that requires that "Wireguard" stuff.

Thank you men of Debian!


-- 
A person of great honour in Ireland (who was pleased to
stoop so low as to look into my mind) used to tell me that
my mind was like a conjured spirit, that would do mischief
if I did not give it employment.
                                 Jonathan Swift

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#229039

FromNicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com>
Date2020-11-24 22:10 +0100
Message-ID<BeNJv-7CX-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#229037

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Bob, quite a few times Ive installed Debian on Ubuntu ☺ Keep an eye on gcc
and the versions of its libraries. Especially when building from source.
Ubuntu is usually in advance of Debian in that respect.
Bob are you the same BB I knew at UIC?
I live down the road these days.

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 2:11 PM Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Brian wrote:
>
> > It is permitted! You get to keep any broken bits, of course!
>
> Hrrmm...I read your observation as a cautionary tale. Perhaps
> I need to investigate this a bit further, with, for example, the
> vendor of the application that requires that "Wireguard" stuff.
>
> Thank you men of Debian!
>
>
> --
> A person of great honour in Ireland (who was pleased to
> stoop so low as to look into my mind) used to tell me that
> my mind was like a conjured spirit, that would do mischief
> if I did not give it employment.
>                                  Jonathan Swift
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#229042

FromCharles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com>
Date2020-11-24 23:00 +0100
Message-ID<BeOvT-7TF-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#229037
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:11:05 -0500 (EST)
Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> wrote:

> > It is permitted! You get to keep any broken bits, of course!  
> 
> Hrrmm...I read your observation as a cautionary tale.

And rightly so.

Fortunately, there may be a better solution. Wireguard is available in
buster backports, bullseye, and testing.
https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=names&section=all&suite=all&arch=any&exact=0&keywords=wireguard

You may wish to enable backports:
https://backports.debian.org/Instructions/

-- 
Does anybody read signatures any more?

https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#229043

From"Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com>
Date2020-11-24 23:20 +0100
Message-ID<BeOPf-8fp-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#229034

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 25.11.2020 00:56, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
>
>> URL doesn't open for me either. It looks like this ppa was removed 
>> and "now been folded into Ubuntu itself". [1]
>
>> [1] https://launchpad.net/~wireguard
>
> Ah...thanks for finding the way into that rabbit-hole.
>
> Do you think it is permitted for a debian install to point its apt-get 
> at a Ubuntu repository?
>
>
There is no need for that rather dangerous action, because "wireguard" 
is available at least in Debian "buster-backports" repository. [1]


[1] 
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=all&searchon=names&keywords=wireguard

-- 
With kindest regards, Alexander.

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#229078

Fromsongbird <songbird@anthive.com>
Date2020-11-25 21:20 +0100
Message-ID<Bf9qJ-3Z3-59@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#229027
Bob Bernstein wrote:
...
  it looks like you are mixing Ubuntu and Debian?


  songbird

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web