Groups > linux.debian.user > #231594 > unrolled thread

how to set link/level in wifi configuration?

Started by	Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com>
First post	2021-02-10 23:50 +0100
Last post	2021-02-12 21:00 +0100
Articles	20 on this page of 26 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

  how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-10 23:50 +0100
    Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? pioruns2020 <pioruns2020@gmx.com> - 2021-02-11 00:10 +0100
      Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-11 02:50 +0100
        Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2021-02-11 03:40 +0100
          Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-11 07:50 +0100
            Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com> - 2021-02-11 11:00 +0100
    Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2021-02-11 10:00 +0100
      Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-11 10:40 +0100
    Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-02-11 10:40 +0100
      Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-11 11:10 +0100
        Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? pioruns2020 <pioruns2020@gmx.com> - 2021-02-11 11:40 +0100
          Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-02-11 12:00 +0100
            Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? pioruns2019 <pioruns2019@gmx.com> - 2021-02-12 23:30 +0100
              Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-13 02:20 +0100
                Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-13 04:10 +0100
        Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-11 13:40 +0100
    Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2021-02-11 11:30 +0100
      Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-11 12:40 +0100
        Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2021-02-11 13:50 +0100
          Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2021-02-11 15:10 +0100
            Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-11 18:40 +0100
              Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2021-02-11 22:30 +0100
                Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-12 00:30 +0100
    Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-12 12:10 +0100
      Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2021-02-12 14:40 +0100
        Re: how to set link/level in wifi configuration? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-12 21:00 +0100

Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →

#231594 — how to set link/level in wifi configuration?

From	Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com>
Date	2021-02-10 23:50 +0100
Subject	how to set link/level in wifi configuration?
Message-ID	<BH6t4-3Xy-7@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

auto wlx502b73d50a69
iface wlx502b73d50a69 inet dhcp
wireless-essid JHotel
i use above to set up wireless connection in stretchbut often link/level is low (about 30) according to xosviewand connection can be easily lostif link/level is about 50, connection is stable
buster has same problem

ubuntu can easily connect above link/level 60, it's stable

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#231595

From	pioruns2020 <pioruns2020@gmx.com>
Date	2021-02-11 00:10 +0100
Message-ID	<BH6Mr-4jX-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231594

On 10/02/2021 22:45, Long Wind wrote:
> auto wlx502b73d50a69
> iface wlx502b73d50a69 inet dhcp
> wireless-essid JHotel

Means nothing. You need to provide full report from inxi or similar tool.

> i use above to set up wireless connection in stretch
> but often link/level is low (about 30) according to xosview
> and connection can be easily lost

Okay

> if link/level is about 50, connection is stable
> buster has same problem

That's not a system problem, unless driver uses less power comparing to
Ubuntu.
>
> ubuntu can easily connect above link/level 60, it's stable

Move closer to your Access Point.

--
Kind regards,
pioruns2020

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231596

From	Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com>
Date	2021-02-11 02:50 +0100
Message-ID	<BH9hf-5CW-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231595

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

 i've just installed inxi, but i don't think it's helpful

zhou@debian:~$ inxi
CPU: Dual Core Pentium E6500 (-MCP-) speed/min/max: 1603/1603/2936 MHz 
Kernel: 4.9.0-8-686-pae i686 Up: 4m Mem: 390.5/4005.9 MiB (9.7%) 
Storage: 74.53 GiB (42.2% used) Procs: 103 Shell: bash 4.4.12 inxi: 3.0.32 
zhou@debian:~$

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231597

From	Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com>
Date	2021-02-11 03:40 +0100
Message-ID	<BHa3D-67w-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231596

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 2/10/21 5:40 PM, Long Wind wrote:
> i've just installed inxi, but i don't think it's helpful
try inxi -F
>
> zhou@debian:~$ inxi
> CPU: Dual Core Pentium E6500 (-MCP-) speed/min/max: 1603/1603/2936 MHz
> Kernel: 4.9.0-8-686-pae i686 Up: 4m Mem: 390.5/4005.9 MiB (9.7%)
> Storage: 74.53 GiB (42.2% used) Procs: 103 Shell: bash 4.4.12 inxi: 
> 3.0.32
> zhou@debian:~$
>
>
>
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231598

From	Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com>
Date	2021-02-11 07:50 +0100
Message-ID	<BHdXz-6q-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231597

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

zhou@debian:~$ inxi -F
System:
  Host: debian Kernel: 4.9.0-8-686-pae i686 bits: 32 Desktop: twm 
  Distro: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) 
Machine:
  Type: Desktop System: LENOVO product: ThinkCentre M4250S v: Lenovo 
  serial: <root required> 
  Mobo: LENOVO model: N/A serial: <root required> BIOS: LENOVO v: 90KT16AUS 
  date: 10/21/2010 
CPU:
  Topology: Dual Core model: Pentium E6500 bits: 64 type: MCP 
  L2 cache: 2048 KiB 
  Speed: 1603 MHz min/max: 1603/2936 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 1603 2: 1603 
Graphics:
  Device-1: Intel 4 Series Integrated Graphics driver: i915 v: kernel 
  Display: server: X.Org 1.20.4 driver: i915 resolution: 1366x768~60Hz 
  OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel G41 x86/MMX/SSE2 v: 2.1 Mesa 18.3.6 
Audio:
  Device-1: Intel NM10/ICH7 Family High Definition Audio 
  driver: snd_hda_intel 
  Sound Server: ALSA v: k4.9.0-8-686-pae 
Network:
  Message: No Device data found. 
  Device-1: Ralink MT7601U Wireless Adapter type: USB driver: mt7601u 
  IF: wlx502b73d50a69 state: up mac: 50:2b:73:d5:0a:69 
Drives:
  Local Storage: total: 74.53 GiB used: 31.48 GiB (42.2%) 
  ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Maxtor model: 6Y080M0 size: 74.53 GiB 
Partition:
  ID-1: / size: 8.09 GiB used: 5.39 GiB (66.6%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda3 
Sensors:
  System Temperatures: cpu: 39.0 C mobo: N/A 
  Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A 
Info:
  Processes: 96 Uptime: 6m Memory: 3.91 GiB used: 331.0 MiB (8.3%) 
  Shell: bash inxi: 3.0.32 
zhou@debian:~$

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231603

From	didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com>
Date	2021-02-11 11:00 +0100
Message-ID	<BHgVr-1QV-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231598

Le 11/02/2021 à 07:42, Long Wind a écrit :
> zhou@debian:~$ inxi -F
> System:
>    Host: debian Kernel: 4.9.0-8-686-pae i686 bits: 32 Desktop: twm
>    Distro: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch)
[...]
>    Topology: Dual Core model: Pentium E6500 bits: 64 type: MCP
[...]
>    Device-1: Ralink MT7601U Wireless Adapter type: USB driver: mt7601u
[...]
The MT7601U chipset is not a recent one so it should not require a very 
recent kernel (in case Ubuntu has a more recent kernel that your Debian 
distros)

There is one notable difference, though, between your Ubuntu and Debian 
distros: there is no more i386 version of Ubuntu, so you are using a 
amd64 version of it but you are using a i386 architecture version of 
Debian on your amd64 architecture processor (with PAE).
  That could be the origin of your problems and I suggest you using an 
amd64 Debian: nowadays I would say that running a 32bits OS on a 64bits 
proc probably offers mostly drawbacks...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231600

From	Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi>
Date	2021-02-11 10:00 +0100
Message-ID	<BHfZn-1hz-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231594

Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> writes:

> ubuntu can easily connect above link/level 60, it's stable

If you mean with same hardware and same location then why not stick with
it since it works better? If you don't mean that then what do you mean?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231601

From	Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com>
Date	2021-02-11 10:40 +0100
Message-ID	<BHgC5-1JN-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231600

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

 you mean i stick with ubuntu?i'm long-time user of debianubuntu is new to me, i'm not comfortable with it

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231602

From	Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
Date	2021-02-11 10:40 +0100
Message-ID	<BHgC5-1JN-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231594

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mi, 10 feb 21, 22:45:23, Long Wind wrote:
> auto wlx502b73d50a69
> iface wlx502b73d50a69 inet dhcp
> wireless-essid JHotel
> i use above to set up wireless connection in stretchbut often link/level is low (about 30) according to xosviewand connection can be easily lostif link/level is about 50, connection is stable
> buster has same problem
> 
> ubuntu can easily connect above link/level 60, it's stable

What's the difference between Debian and Ubuntu, in particular kernel 
and firmware-ralink?

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231604

From	Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com>
Date	2021-02-11 11:10 +0100
Message-ID	<BHh57-29t-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231602

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

 here is Ubuntu's kernel, according "uname -a"
Linux zhou-Lenovo 4.15.0-45-generic #48~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 29 18:03:19 UTC 2019 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
it's built from stretch/sid according its /etc/debian_version 

i don't know how to find out firmware, i guess it uses same as debian 

they say ubuntu is more user-friendly and i know less details

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231606

From	pioruns2020 <pioruns2020@gmx.com>
Date	2021-02-11 11:40 +0100
Message-ID	<BHhya-2iN-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231604

On 11/02/2021 10:04, Long Wind wrote:
> here is Ubuntu's kernel, according "uname -a"
> Linux zhou-Lenovo 4.15.0-45-generic #48~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 29
> 18:03:19 UTC 2019 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> it's built from stretch/sid according its /etc/debian_version
>
> i don't know how to find out firmware, i guess it uses same as debian
>
> they say ubuntu is more user-friendly and i know less details
>
>
You are using 32-bit Ubuntu and Debian on 64-bit processor. Why?

Ubuntu uses kernel 4.15.
Debian uses kernel 4.9, much older. This could be source of your problem.

--
Kind regards,
pioruns2020

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231609

From	<tomas@tuxteam.de>
Date	2021-02-11 12:00 +0100
Message-ID	<BHhRw-2pc-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231606

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:18:49AM +0000, pioruns2020 wrote:
> On 11/02/2021 10:04, Long Wind wrote:
> >here is Ubuntu's kernel, according "uname -a"
> >Linux zhou-Lenovo 4.15.0-45-generic #48~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 29
> >18:03:19 UTC 2019 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
> >
> >it's built from stretch/sid according its /etc/debian_version
> >
> >i don't know how to find out firmware, i guess it uses same as debian
> >
> >they say ubuntu is more user-friendly and i know less details
> >
> >
> You are using 32-bit Ubuntu and Debian on 64-bit processor. Why?
> 
> Ubuntu uses kernel 4.15.
> Debian uses kernel 4.9, much older. This could be source of your problem.

FWIW, Debian stable's current kernel is 4.19.

Cheers
 - t

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231677

From	pioruns2019 <pioruns2019@gmx.com>
Date	2021-02-12 23:30 +0100
Message-ID	<BHP6N-5GW-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231609

On 11/02/2021 10:52, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> FWIW, Debian stable's current kernel is 4.19.
>
> Cheers
>   - t

I don't think OP bothered to update his system.

--
Kind regards,
pioruns2019

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231680

From	Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com>
Date	2021-02-13 02:20 +0100
Message-ID	<BHRLj-7hN-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231677

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

both my ubuntu and fedora 25 are old, their wifi connection are oki don't think new kernel can solve my problem

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231681

From	Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com>
Date	2021-02-13 04:10 +0100
Message-ID	<BHTtL-8l0-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231680

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

i've moved to other hotel, wifi is good, it seems closer to APthough freq is still 2412 MHz

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231613

From	Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
Date	2021-02-11 13:40 +0100
Message-ID	<BHjqi-3ra-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231604

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:04:45AM +0000, Long Wind wrote:
> i don't know how to find out firmware, i guess it uses same as debian 

Don't guess.

dpkg -l | grep firmware

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231605

From	David <bouncingcats@gmail.com>
Date	2021-02-11 11:30 +0100
Message-ID	<BHhou-2fu-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231594

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 09:46, Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> wrote:

> auto wlx502b73d50a69
> iface wlx502b73d50a69 inet dhcp
> wireless-essid JHotel

> i use above to set up wireless connection in stretch
> but often link/level is low (about 30) according to xosview
> and connection can be easily lost
> if link/level is about 50, connection is stable

> buster has same problem
> ubuntu can easily connect above link/level 60, it's stable

Can you show us the output of the following commands
for Ubuntu and also for Debian?

# iw dev wlx502b73d50a69 info
# iw dev wlx502b73d50a69 link
# iw dev wlx502b73d50a69 station dump

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231612

From	Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com>
Date	2021-02-11 12:40 +0100
Message-ID	<BHiud-2Rp-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231605

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

 Thank David! below is your requested output by ubuntu and debianbut link/level in debian is above 50, it's ok, i'm afraid it offer little clue to my problem
output by ubuntu:zhou@zhou-Lenovo:~$ iw dev wlx502b73d50a69 info
Interface wlx502b73d50a69
        ifindex 2
        wdev 0x1
        addr 50:2b:73:d5:0a:69
        ssid JHotel
        type managed
        wiphy 0
        channel 11 (2462 MHz), width: 20 MHz, center1: 2462 MHz
zhou@zhou-Lenovo:~$ iw dev wlx502b73d50a69 link
Connected to 06:74:9c:9b:f9:99 (on wlx502b73d50a69)
        SSID: JHotel
        freq: 2462
        RX: 211078 bytes (2150 packets)
        TX: 19433 bytes (199 packets)
        signal: -41 dBm
        tx bitrate: 58.5 MBit/s MCS 6

        bss flags:      short-preamble short-slot-time
        dtim period:    1
        beacon int:     100
zhou@zhou-Lenovo:~$ iw dev wlx502b73d50a69 station dump
Station 06:74:9c:9b:f9:99 (on wlx502b73d50a69)
        inactive time:  5404 ms
        rx bytes:       243537
        rx packets:     2486
        tx bytes:       21049
        tx packets:     225
        tx retries:     50
        tx failed:      0
        signal:         -41 [-41] dBm
        signal avg:     -42 [-42] dBm
        tx bitrate:     65.0 MBit/s MCS 7
        rx bitrate:     11.0 MBit/s
        expected throughput:    31.218Mbps
        authorized:     yes
        authenticated:  yes
        preamble:       long
        WMM/WME:        yes
        MFP:            no
        TDLS peer:      no
zhou@zhou-Lenovo:~$
output by debian:root@debian:~# iw dev wlx502b73d50a69 info
Interface wlx502b73d50a69
        ifindex 2
        wdev 0x1
        addr 50:2b:73:d5:0a:69
        ssid JHotel
        type managed
        wiphy 0
        channel 1 (2412 MHz), width: 20 MHz, center1: 2412 MHz
        txpower 20.00 dBm
root@debian:~# iw dev wlx502b73d50a69 link
Connected to 06:74:9c:6e:ca:6a (on wlx502b73d50a69)
        SSID: JHotel
        freq: 2412
        RX: 8705059 bytes (16115 packets)
        TX: 1882637 bytes (7086 packets)
        signal: -53 dBm
        rx bitrate: 72.2 MBit/s MCS 7 short GI
        tx bitrate: 43.3 MBit/s MCS 4 short GI

        bss flags:      short-preamble short-slot-time
        dtim period:    1
        beacon int:     100
root@debian:~# iw dev wlx502b73d50a69 station dump
Station 06:74:9c:6e:ca:6a (on wlx502b73d50a69)
        inactive time:  2440 ms
        rx bytes:       8724627
        rx packets:     16318
        tx bytes:       1883412
        tx packets:     7089
        tx retries:     6356
        tx failed:      160
        beacon loss:    46
        beacon rx:      4071
        rx drop misc:   288
        signal:         -51 [-51] dBm
        signal avg:     -52 [-52] dBm
        beacon signal avg:      -52 dBm
        tx bitrate:     72.2 MBit/s MCS 7 short GI
        rx bitrate:     72.2 MBit/s MCS 7 short GI
        expected throughput:    26.367Mbps
        authorized:     yes
        authenticated:  yes
        associated:     yes
        preamble:       long
        WMM/WME:        yes
        MFP:            no
        TDLS peer:      no
        DTIM period:    1
        beacon interval:100
        short preamble: yes
        short slot time:yes
        connected time: 623 seconds

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231614

From	David <bouncingcats@gmail.com>
Date	2021-02-11 13:50 +0100
Message-ID	<BHjzY-3vC-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231612

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 22:37, Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Thank David! below is your requested output by ubuntu and debian
> but link/level in debian is above 50, it's ok, i'm afraid it offer little clue to my problem

> output by ubuntu:
> zhou@zhou-Lenovo:~$ iw dev wlx502b73d50a69 link
> Connected to 06:74:9c:9b:f9:99 (on wlx502b73d50a69)
>         SSID: JHotel
>         freq: 2462
>         signal: -41 dBm

> output by debian:
> root@debian:~# iw dev wlx502b73d50a69 link
> Connected to 06:74:9c:6e:ca:6a (on wlx502b73d50a69)
>         SSID: JHotel
>         freq: 2412
>         signal: -53 dBm

It looks like you have 2 access points (AP) near you on the JHotel network.

Ubuntu is connecting to an AP using channel 11 (2462 MHz) at -41dBm
signal strength.
This is a good signal strength.

Debian is connecting to an AP using channel 1 (2412 MHz) at -53dBm
signal strength.
This is weaker than the other channel and will have worse performance.

I suggest you try to configure Debian to use channel 11.
You should look how best to do this on your computer.
On my computer (yours might be different) I would do it like this:

In the file /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf there will be
something like:
  network={
  ssid="JHotel"
  ...
  }

Add a line to specify the channel frequency like this.
  network={
  ssid="JHotel"
  frequency=2462
  ...
  }

The goal is that when you run
  # iw dev wlx502b73d50a69 link
you want to see:
  freq: 2462

Do NOT post your wpa_supplicant.conf file here,
because it contains private password information.

Some basic explanation:
https://www.metageek.com/training/resources/why-channels-1-6-11.html
https://www.metageek.com/training/resources/wifi-signal-strength-basics.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231616

From	David <bouncingcats@gmail.com>
Date	2021-02-11 15:10 +0100
Message-ID	<BHkPo-4ro-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#231614

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 23:43, David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> wrote:

> In the file /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf there will be
> something like:
>   network={
>   ssid="JHotel"
>   ...
>   }
>
> Add a line to specify the channel frequency like this.
>   network={
>   ssid="JHotel"
>   frequency=2462
>   ...
>   }

Sorry, I made an error in the above.
I should have tested it instead of relying
on a random web page :<

The correct version is below, I tested, it works:

Add a line to specify the channel frequency like this.
  network={
  ssid="JHotel"
  freq_list=2462
  ...
  }

WARNING: This will configure your wifi to ONLY work
on channel 11 on this SSID and it will ignore all other channels
on this SSID.

The documentation is in
/usr/share/doc/wpasupplicant/examples/wpa_supplicant.conf

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →

csiph-web

how to set link/level in wifi configuration?

Contents

#231594 — how to set link/level in wifi configuration?

#231595

#231596

#231597

#231598

#231603

#231600

#231601

#231602

#231604

#231606

#231609

#231677

#231680

#231681

#231613

#231605

#231612

#231614

#231616