Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #231662 > unrolled thread

chromium: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

Contents

  chromium: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED Rainer Dorsch <ml@bokomoko.de> - 2021-02-12 21:20 +0100
    Re: chromium: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 21:30 +0100
      Re: chromium: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED Rainer Dorsch <ml@bokomoko.de> - 2021-02-12 22:30 +0100
    Re: chromium: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2021-02-12 21:40 +0100
      Re: chromium: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> - 2021-02-12 22:00 +0100
        Re: chromium: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2021-02-12 22:10 +0100
          Re: chromium: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2021-02-12 22:20 +0100
        Re: chromium: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2021-02-12 22:30 +0100
      Re: chromium: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED Rainer Dorsch <ml@bokomoko.de> - 2021-02-12 22:30 +0100

#231662 — chromium: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED

Hi,

I suddenly cannot access my local managed switch anymore from chromium:

Chromium tries to swtich to the HTTPS protocol but the switch only supports 
HTTP protocol

The error message I get is

ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED

Chromium 83 still worked.

Is there a way avoid this automatic switch for a site? 

Thanks
Rainer

-- 
Rainer Dorsch
http://bokomoko.de/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#231663

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 09:15:35PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I suddenly cannot access my local managed switch anymore from chromium:
> 
> Chromium tries to swtich to the HTTPS protocol but the switch only supports 
> HTTP protocol
> 
> The error message I get is
> 
> ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED
> 
> Chromium 83 still worked.
> 
> Is there a way avoid this automatic switch for a site? 
> 
Did you use the device IP or hostname without the protocol prefix?  From
what I have observed, if I put just the IP or hostname, e.g.,
"192.168.1.1" without specifying the protocol it defaults to HTTPS.
However, if I include the protocol, e.g., "http://192.168.1.1" then the
browser should respect that and try to default to HTTPS.

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sánchez

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231675

Am Freitag, 12. Februar 2021, 21:29:21 CET schrieb Roberto C. Sánchez:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 09:15:35PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I suddenly cannot access my local managed switch anymore from chromium:
> > 
> > Chromium tries to swtich to the HTTPS protocol but the switch only
> > supports
> > HTTP protocol
> > 
> > The error message I get is
> > 
> > ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED
> > 
> > Chromium 83 still worked.
> > 
> > Is there a way avoid this automatic switch for a site?
> 
> Did you use the device IP or hostname without the protocol prefix?  From
> what I have observed, if I put just the IP or hostname, e.g.,
> "192.168.1.1" without specifying the protocol it defaults to HTTPS.
> However, if I include the protocol, e.g., "http://192.168.1.1" then the
> browser should respect that and try to default to HTTPS.
> 

Thanks for your quick reply. The first page load, but when I submit the 
password, I get the ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED and I see that it tries to access 
https.

Rainer

-- 
Rainer Dorsch
http://bokomoko.de/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231664

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 13/2/21 4:15 am, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I suddenly cannot access my local managed switch anymore from chromium:
>
> Chromium tries to swtich to the HTTPS protocol but the switch only supports
> HTTP protocol
>
> The error message I get is
>
> ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED
>
> Chromium 83 still worked.
>
> Is there a way avoid this automatic switch for a site?
>
> Thanks
> Rainer
>

Chrome behaviour has become more intolerant of https and http over the 
past year or so - to the point it is unusable of there is any 
certificate problems.
Firefox is going the same way.

For problematic sites I use GNU Web instead. It will be perfectly 
adequate to access your switch web page.

-- 
Jeremy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231665

On 2/12/21 10:39 PM, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> 
> For problematic sites I use GNU Web instead. It will be perfectly
> adequate to access your switch web page.
> 


What is GNU Web, does Debian have package for it?

Kind regards
Georgi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231666

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021, 3:51 PM Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> wrote:

> On 2/12/21 10:39 PM, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> >
> > For problematic sites I use GNU Web instead. It will be perfectly
> > adequate to access your switch web page.
> >
>
> What is GNU Web, does Debian have package for it?
>

I know of GNU IceCat.  Is that what is being referred to here?

>
> Kind regards
> Georgi
>

Kenneth Parker

>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231670

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021, 4:01 PM Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021, 3:51 PM Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> wrote:
>
>> On 2/12/21 10:39 PM, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
>> >
>> > For problematic sites I use GNU Web instead. It will be perfectly
>> > adequate to access your switch web page.
>> >
>>
>> What is GNU Web, does Debian have package for it?
>>
>
> I know of GNU IceCat.  Is that what is being referred to here?
>

I answered my own question:  There's also a "Gnome Web", originally called
Epiphany.

And, referring to my prior response, IceCat may not be, directly packaged
under Debian.  (At least I don't see it).

Kenneth Parker
>
>>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231672

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 13/2/21 4:44 am, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> On 2/12/21 10:39 PM, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
>> For problematic sites I use GNU Web instead. It will be perfectly
>> adequate to access your switch web page.
>>
>
> What is GNU Web, does Debian have package for it?
>
> Kind regards
> Georgi
>

My error Gnome Web. not GNU Web. I thnk it comes from epiphany package

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany

sudo apt install epiphany-browser epiphany-web-data


It shows as 'Web' in the gnome Internet sub-menu

-- 
Jeremy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#231673

Am Freitag, 12. Februar 2021, 21:39:10 CET schrieb Jeremy Ardley:
> On 13/2/21 4:15 am, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I suddenly cannot access my local managed switch anymore from chromium:
> > 
> > Chromium tries to swtich to the HTTPS protocol but the switch only
> > supports
> > HTTP protocol
> > 
> > The error message I get is
> > 
> > ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED
> > 
> > Chromium 83 still worked.
> > 
> > Is there a way avoid this automatic switch for a site?
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Rainer
> 
> Chrome behaviour has become more intolerant of https and http over the
> past year or so - to the point it is unusable of there is any
> certificate problems.
> Firefox is going the same way.

Firefox still lets to log into the switch (Netgear JGS524PE). But here it 
seems that since ESR78 there is a (probably a javascript) incompatibility with 
the switch and it does not change settings.

> For problematic sites I use GNU Web instead. It will be perfectly
> adequate to access your switch web page.

I found the konqueror works as well. Usually it is the other way round.

Thanks
Rainer
-- 
Rainer Dorsch
http://bokomoko.de/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user

csiph-web