Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #230829 > unrolled thread
| Started by | steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-01-19 10:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2021-01-19 18:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 on this page of 44 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-19 10:10 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-01-19 13:50 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-01-19 14:50 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-19 15:50 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-01-19 16:00 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-19 16:10 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-01-19 17:20 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-01-19 18:10 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-20 08:50 +0100
[SOLVED] Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-20 08:50 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-20 09:50 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-01-20 10:20 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-20 10:50 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-01-20 11:00 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-20 11:20 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-20 11:30 +0100
Bluewin bouncing my mails [was: Too many levels of symbolic links] tomas@tuxteam.de - 2021-01-20 11:30 +0100
Re: Bluewin bouncing my mails tomas@tuxteam.de - 2021-01-20 12:50 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-01-20 11:30 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2021-01-20 11:40 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-01-20 11:40 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-20 12:10 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-01-20 16:20 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-20 16:40 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-01-20 22:10 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-21 08:10 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-21 08:40 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:50 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-22 08:10 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-01-22 13:50 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-23 09:40 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-01-23 16:20 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 14:00 +0100
remove me from this list J B Martin <bryant@ab-domain.com> - 2021-01-22 14:10 +0100
Re: remove me from this list Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2021-01-22 18:50 +0100
Re: remove me from this list "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-01-23 11:00 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-23 09:40 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-01-22 03:50 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-22 08:10 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-01-22 20:30 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-01-22 21:10 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-23 15:40 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-01-19 17:20 +0100
Re: Too many levels of symbolic links steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2021-01-19 18:00 +0100
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-22 21:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BAaUN-5hl-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #230980 |
David Wright wrote: > > > > Does mdadm have a > > > equivalent manner of displaying its configuration? > > Not having used it, I wondered whether mdadm could effortlessly > "brain-dump" in a similar manner to either of these methods. sudo mdadm --detail --scan will produce all the necessary info for an /etc/mdadm.conf -dsr-
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-23 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BAsf0-73H-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #230980 |
Le 22-01-2021, à 13:21:53 -0600, David Wright a écrit : >On Fri 22 Jan 2021 at 08:06:37 (+0100), steve wrote: >> Le 21-01-2021, à 20:41:05 -0600, David Wright a écrit : >> >> > I always archive the output of udevadm for my disks (actually >> > I just copy the /run/udev/data/b8\:* files). >> >> I don't understand. > >I keep a log for each of my hard drives, its acquisition, SMART >history, partitioning, filesystems, usage, problems, etc. >At the end of my opinions come the facts, the output of >udevadm info --query=all --name=/dev/sdX and >udevadm info --query=all --name=/dev/sdXN for all N. >By that means, I have information available for a drive even >when its host is powered off, or the drive is in storage. > >When I edit said log file on the system that it attaches to, >I could update all the udevadm information by removing the >old version and then appending it again by running udevadm >several times. But instead I usually copy in the appropriate >subset of files /run/udev/data/b8\:* that contain almost all >the same information, just for convenience as I'm already in >an editor. Here's a small sample (pruned with grep) of that >information being obtained from each of those sources: > >$ for j in '' 1 2 3 4 5 6 ; do udevadm info --query=all --name=/dev/sda$j ; done | grep -e 'ID_FS_UUID=' >E: ID_FS_UUID=9a3fa215-a749-47f4-a33e-5708097634b2 >E: ID_FS_UUID=10358228-7f4b-49ec-8864-2547e27bccdb >E: ID_FS_UUID=33c3cbeb-ee4b-4a21-9899-49e546f024de >E: ID_FS_UUID=98f15f4c-e3fc-45f3-aa15-3774e012e996 >$ > >$ grep -e 'ID_FS_UUID=' /run/udev/data/b8\:? >/run/udev/data/b8:3:E:ID_FS_UUID=9a3fa215-a749-47f4-a33e-5708097634b2 >/run/udev/data/b8:4:E:ID_FS_UUID=10358228-7f4b-49ec-8864-2547e27bccdb >/run/udev/data/b8:5:E:ID_FS_UUID=33c3cbeb-ee4b-4a21-9899-49e546f024de >/run/udev/data/b8:6:E:ID_FS_UUID=98f15f4c-e3fc-45f3-aa15-3774e012e996 >$ Ok I got it, thanks for the explanation. As a matter of fact, I never user 'udevadm' before today, never needed it I guess.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-19 17:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Bz1TA-3LI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #230847 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:03:14PM +0100, steve wrote: > Le 19-01-2021, à 15:53:00 +0100, tomas@tuxteam.de a écrit : > > >>find /usr -follow -printf "" > >>find: Boucle détectée dans le système de fichiers ; « ‘/usr/bin/X11’ » est dans la même boucle que ‘/usr/bin’. > >> > >>ls -l /usr/bin/X11 > >>lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1 6 mai 2013 /usr/bin/X11 -> . > >> > >> > >>find /sys -follow -printf "" > >[...] > > > >Not every one of those are "bad". The X11 one is normal. Many of those in > >/sys and /dev, too. > > How can I tell the difference ? > > > > >It'd be interesting to know which one your startup is choking on. > > What does it mean more precisely? The lines come from syslog and only > mention partitions: > > Jan 19 09:09:33 box systemd-udevd[607]: sdg6: Failed to update device symlinks: Too many levels of symbolic links > Jan 19 09:09:33 box systemd-udevd[611]: sdc1: Failed to update device symlinks: Too many levels of symbolic links > Jan 19 09:09:33 box systemd-udevd[572]: sdc6: Failed to update device symlinks: Too many levels of symbolic links Hm. Difficult to say. Besides, I'm a systemd analphabet. Are those /dev/sdXX above symlinks? As far as I know, there is a knob to increase udev's log level in /etc/udev/udev.conf -- it's called udev_log (see e.g. [1]). Perhaps it's helpful. Cheers [1] https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/udev.conf.5.html - t
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-19 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Bz2wi-42u-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #230853 |
Le 19-01-2021, à 17:11:58 +0100, tomas@tuxteam.de a écrit : >> >It'd be interesting to know which one your startup is choking on. >> >> What does it mean more precisely? The lines come from syslog and only >> mention partitions: >> >> Jan 19 09:09:33 box systemd-udevd[607]: sdg6: Failed to update device symlinks: Too many levels of symbolic links >> Jan 19 09:09:33 box systemd-udevd[611]: sdc1: Failed to update device symlinks: Too many levels of symbolic links >> Jan 19 09:09:33 box systemd-udevd[572]: sdc6: Failed to update device symlinks: Too many levels of symbolic links > >Hm. Difficult to say. Besides, I'm a systemd analphabet. > >Are those /dev/sdXX above symlinks? No. >As far as I know, there is a knob to increase udev's log level >in /etc/udev/udev.conf -- it's called udev_log (see e.g. [1]). > >Perhaps it's helpful. Thanks, I'll give it a try.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web