Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #228559 > unrolled thread

Re: Local shared storage configuration

Started byKamil Jońca <kjonca@poczta.onet.pl>
First post2020-11-11 09:40 +0100
Last post2020-11-11 13:20 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Local shared storage configuration Kamil Jońca <kjonca@poczta.onet.pl> - 2020-11-11 09:40 +0100
    Re: Local shared storage configuration Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 13:20 +0100

#228559 — Re: Local shared storage configuration

FromKamil Jońca <kjonca@poczta.onet.pl>
Date2020-11-11 09:40 +0100
SubjectRe: Local shared storage configuration
Message-ID<B9TPA-ZJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mi, 11 nov 20, 08:44:18, Kamil Jońca wrote:
>> Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Ma, 03 nov 20, 17:34:48, Joe wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Those of us who use NTFS do so deliberately to provide compatibility
>> >> with Windows. It's not that long ago that Linux NTFS support was a bit
>> >> flaky, so we don't do it solely by our own choice. 
>> >
>> > One use case that is significantly easier with NTFS is setting up a 
>> > shared local storage for several users on the same system.
>> 
>> Why not for example exFat? (This is not a rant, I have no such
>> requirements so far and I am just curious)
>
> What would be the benefits of exFAT over NTFS (on Linux).

exfat is simpler,
exfat has kernel driver

Am I wrong?
KJ

-- 
http://wolnelektury.pl/wesprzyj/teraz/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#228567

FromAndrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
Date2020-11-11 13:20 +0100
Message-ID<B9Xgu-38g-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#228559

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mi, 11 nov 20, 09:23:07, Kamil Jońca wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On Mi, 11 nov 20, 08:44:18, Kamil Jońca wrote:
> >> Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> writes:
> >> 
> >> > On Ma, 03 nov 20, 17:34:48, Joe wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> Those of us who use NTFS do so deliberately to provide compatibility
> >> >> with Windows. It's not that long ago that Linux NTFS support was a bit
> >> >> flaky, so we don't do it solely by our own choice. 
> >> >
> >> > One use case that is significantly easier with NTFS is setting up a 
> >> > shared local storage for several users on the same system.
> >> 
> >> Why not for example exFat? (This is not a rant, I have no such
> >> requirements so far and I am just curious)
> >
> > What would be the benefits of exFAT over NTFS (on Linux).
> 
> exfat is simpler,
> exfat has kernel driver

Right. On the other hand NTFS supports symbolic and hard links (need 
these), and being case sensitive is also one less worry in a Linux 
environment.

Kind regards,
Andrei.
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web