Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #225732 > unrolled thread

Re: off-topic: URIBL_BLACK

Started by"Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net>
First post2020-08-02 09:40 +0200
Last post2020-08-02 09:40 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: off-topic: URIBL_BLACK "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2020-08-02 09:40 +0200

#225732 — Re: off-topic: URIBL_BLACK

From"Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net>
Date2020-08-02 09:40 +0200
SubjectRe: off-topic: URIBL_BLACK
Message-ID<AzgL8-37A-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi,

황병희 wrote:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=4.0 [...]URIBL_BLACK[...]
> [...]
> i got URIBL_BLACK score in SpamAssassin.

Grrr. Why are spam slanderers and virus scammers allowed to interfere
with Debian ?
Debian 10 installs a Firefox which accuses Debian ISOs of being malware
and now our mailing list asks URIBL about the reputation of people's ISPs.

  http://uribl.com/faq.shtml
  "Can you tell me why my domain is blacklisted?
   No. [...]"

I did not find a page yet where they would sell permissions to spam.
But an honest libel service is nearly as bad as a bribable one.

We cannot stop them, but we should not support them by including their
info in spam decisions of Debian lists.


Have a nice day :)

Thomas

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web