Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #225493 > unrolled thread

Any success with /var on ZFS in Debian Buster?

Started byJames Allsopp <jamesaallsopp@googlemail.com>
First post2020-07-29 16:00 +0200
Last post2020-07-30 16:50 +0200
Articles 6 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user


Contents

  Any success with /var on ZFS in Debian Buster? James Allsopp <jamesaallsopp@googlemail.com> - 2020-07-29 16:00 +0200
    Re: Any success with /var on ZFS in Debian Buster? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-07-29 16:00 +0200
      Re: Any success with /var on ZFS in Debian Buster? elvis <elvis@dogonfire.com> - 2020-07-30 07:30 +0200
        Re: Any success with /var on ZFS in Debian Buster? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-07-30 14:20 +0200
          Re: Any success with /var on ZFS in Debian Buster? James Allsopp <jamesaallsopp@googlemail.com> - 2020-07-30 16:20 +0200
            Re: Any success with /var on ZFS in Debian Buster? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-07-30 16:50 +0200

#225493 — Any success with /var on ZFS in Debian Buster?

FromJames Allsopp <jamesaallsopp@googlemail.com>
Date2020-07-29 16:00 +0200
SubjectAny success with /var on ZFS in Debian Buster?
Message-ID<AxUMF-qu-3@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,
I was wondering if anyone had enjoyed any success putting /var on a ZFS
partition in Debian Buster?

Thanks
James

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#225496

FromDan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org>
Date2020-07-29 16:00 +0200
Message-ID<AxUMG-qu-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#225493
James Allsopp wrote: 
> Hi,
> I was wondering if anyone had enjoyed any success putting /var on a ZFS
> partition in Debian Buster?

Yes, on a largish number of servers plus a few desktops and a
laptop.

-dsr-

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#225520

Fromelvis <elvis@dogonfire.com>
Date2020-07-30 07:30 +0200
Message-ID<Ay9iF-1dd-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#225496
On 29/7/20 11:56 pm, Dan Ritter wrote:
> James Allsopp wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I was wondering if anyone had enjoyed any success putting /var on a ZFS
>> partition in Debian Buster?
> Yes, on a largish number of servers plus a few desktops and a
> laptop.

And a follow up, why do you use it?



> -dsr-
>
-- 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#225540

FromDan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org>
Date2020-07-30 14:20 +0200
Message-ID<AyfHr-58u-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#225520
elvis wrote: 
> 
> On 29/7/20 11:56 pm, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > James Allsopp wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I was wondering if anyone had enjoyed any success putting /var on a ZFS
> > > partition in Debian Buster?
> > Yes, on a largish number of servers plus a few desktops and a
> > laptop.
> 
> And a follow up, why do you use it?

- data integrity
- snapshots and zfs send/receive for backups
- good reporting of disk events
- does not incur an unacceptable speed penalty
- well documented, relatively simple method of disk replacement
- pools can be transferred between machines without specific
  controller requirements
- flexibility of filesystems-on-pools

And because I have that experience at work, I am reasonably
happy to run it at home on the systems where it makes sense.

-dsr-

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#225555

FromJames Allsopp <jamesaallsopp@googlemail.com>
Date2020-07-30 16:20 +0200
Message-ID<Ayhzz-6hY-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#225540

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Thanks for that. Is it simply a case of installing the DKMS module,
building the pool (two drives in my case), formatting and mounting?

James

On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 13:18, Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> wrote:

> elvis wrote:
> >
> > On 29/7/20 11:56 pm, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > James Allsopp wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I was wondering if anyone had enjoyed any success putting /var on a
> ZFS
> > > > partition in Debian Buster?
> > > Yes, on a largish number of servers plus a few desktops and a
> > > laptop.
> >
> > And a follow up, why do you use it?
>
> - data integrity
> - snapshots and zfs send/receive for backups
> - good reporting of disk events
> - does not incur an unacceptable speed penalty
> - well documented, relatively simple method of disk replacement
> - pools can be transferred between machines without specific
>   controller requirements
> - flexibility of filesystems-on-pools
>
> And because I have that experience at work, I am reasonably
> happy to run it at home on the systems where it makes sense.
>
> -dsr-
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#225557

FromDan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org>
Date2020-07-30 16:50 +0200
Message-ID<Ayi2B-6rI-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#225555
James Allsopp wrote: 
> Thanks for that. Is it simply a case of installing the DKMS module,
> building the pool (two drives in my case), formatting and mounting?

You want to read, at a minimum:

https://pthree.org/2012/12/04/zfs-administration-part-i-vdevs/

It may be 8 years old, but it's substantially still correct.

-dsr-

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web