Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #226511 > unrolled thread

No irq handler for vector

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

Contents

  No irq handler for vector john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2020-08-27 20:00 +0200
    Re: No irq handler for vector Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-08-27 20:20 +0200
      Re: No irq handler for vector john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2020-08-27 20:50 +0200
        Re: No irq handler for vector Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-08-27 21:20 +0200
      Re: No irq handler for vector Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2020-08-27 21:40 +0200

#226511 — No irq handler for vector

Debians,

I just installed Debian Buster and I'm seeing the following messages at
boot:


"[    0.005017] do_IRQ: 1.55 No irq handler for vector
[    0.005017] do_IRQ: 2.55 No irq handler for vector
[    0.005017] do_IRQ: 3.55 No irq handler for vector"


I don't understand what those messages are saying.

What should I do to correct whatever they are telling me?


Any feedback is appriciated.

--
John Doe

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#226512

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:53:01 +0200
john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> wrote:

Hello john,

>What should I do to correct whatever they are telling me?

Seems to be being worked on ATM.

See https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=256227 for some insight.

See
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/535199/how-to-deduce-the-nature-of-an-interrupt-from-its-number
for some quite detailed discussion about the issue.

Short version - you can't do anything.  _Yet_.

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
I hit the ground, boy have I arrived!
The History Of The World (Part 1) - The Damned

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#226513

On 8/27/2020 8:14 PM, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:53:01 +0200
> john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello john,
>

Hi there Brad,

>> What should I do to correct whatever they are telling me?
>
> Seems to be being worked on ATM.
>
> See https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=256227 for some insight.
>
> See
> https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/535199/how-to-deduce-the-nature-of-an-interrupt-from-its-number
> for some quite detailed discussion about the issue.
>
> Short version - you can't do anything.  _Yet_.
>

Many thanks for the URLs and the short version! :)

I appriciated.

--
John Doe

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#226514

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:41:01 +0200
john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> wrote:

Hello john,

>Many thanks for the URLs and the short version! :)

To be fair, my eyes started to glaze over, trying to absorb it all.  I
hope I got the gist of it right.

>I appriciated.

No problem, Jon.

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
You're all invited to a party, you don't even have to come
Get The Funk Out - Extreme

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#226515

On 2020-08-27 19:14 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:

> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:53:01 +0200
> john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello john,
>
>>What should I do to correct whatever they are telling me?
>
> Seems to be being worked on ATM.

I don't think that is actually the case, the activity in the archlinux
forum notwithstanding.

> See https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=256227 for some insight.

There are also bugreports in Fedora and Debian:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551605
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912085

> See
> https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/535199/how-to-deduce-the-nature-of-an-interrupt-from-its-number
> for some quite detailed discussion about the issue.
>
> Short version - you can't do anything.  _Yet_.

I have been seeing these messages for several years on my laptop.  The
good news is that it works fine despite them, but the emergency level
meant that the messages also appeared on the current terminal after
resume from suspend.  I installed an rsyslog filter to stop that.

Cheers,
       Sven

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user

csiph-web