Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #226132 > unrolled thread
| Started by | mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-08-12 12:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2020-08-12 23:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 6 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
tape drives mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2020-08-12 12:50 +0200
Re: tape drives Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-08-12 13:00 +0200
Re: tape drives mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2020-08-12 14:20 +0200
Re: tape drives The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2020-08-12 13:00 +0200
Re: tape drives Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-08-12 13:10 +0200
Re: tape drives Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2020-08-12 23:50 +0200
| From | mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-08-12 12:50 +0200 |
| Subject | tape drives |
| Message-ID | <ACWut-7gE-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Do people use tape drives for backup ? I saved data to tape before but I think they were DAT and not very big but see that these LTO-2 tapes are 600Gb and not expensive. Do people use those ? mick -- Key ID 4BFEBB31
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-08-12 13:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ACWEa-7k1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #226132 |
mick crane wrote: > Do people use tape drives for backup ? > I saved data to tape before but I think they were DAT and not very big but > see that these LTO-2 tapes are 600Gb and not expensive. > Do people use those ? Yes. However, my company has switched over to using disk storage for backups. The time-cost for retrieving a file or a directory is much lower, and we do that small recovery much more often than we need to bring back an entire machine. Also note that LTO-2 is 200GB per tape, not 600. Tape manufacturers have an awful habit of pretending that all data is compressible, and citing a compressed storage amount instead of the raw storage amount. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_Tape-Open should be helpful to you. -dsr-
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-08-12 14:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ACXTz-8eo-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #226133 |
On 2020-08-12 11:58, Dan Ritter wrote: <snipped> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_Tape-Open should be helpful > to you. cheers mick -- Key ID 4BFEBB31
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-08-12 13:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ACWEc-7k1-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #226132 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 2020-08-12 at 06:44, mick crane wrote: > Do people use tape drives for backup ? > I saved data to tape before but I think they were DAT and not very big > but see that these LTO-2 tapes are 600Gb and not expensive. > Do people use those ? Depends on the context you're talking about. I am given to understand that people do very much still use tape drives for backup in a server-room / data-center type of context. However, while I've considered using tapes for backup in my own private environment, last time I looked the cheapest tape drive with support for tapes large enough to be reasonable for my hard-drive capacities was $3000 - and that's just the drive, not the tapes. That rivals - and may surpass - the build-from-parts cost of my entire computer, which is already nearly half storage by dollars spent. It's possible things have changed since then, but I'd be surprised if tape drives were economical enough to be practical in a non-commercial environment. -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-08-12 13:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ACWNT-7Cy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #226134 |
The Wanderer wrote: > However, while I've considered using tapes for backup in my own private > environment, last time I looked the cheapest tape drive with support for > tapes large enough to be reasonable for my hard-drive capacities was > $3000 - and that's just the drive, not the tapes. That rivals - and may > surpass - the build-from-parts cost of my entire computer, which is > already nearly half storage by dollars spent. > > It's possible things have changed since then, but I'd be surprised if > tape drives were economical enough to be practical in a non-commercial > environment. New tape drives are expensive because they are only sold to businesses; used tape drives are cheap because no business wants to buy them. That said, even a new tape drive is a finicky beast compared to a spinning disk; anyone operating them should really have a spare drive, tested, sitting around and waiting for the primary one to fail. -dsr-
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-08-12 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AD6Nb-56u-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #226132 |
Hello, On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:44:54AM +0100, mick crane wrote: > Do people use tape drives for backup ? Only in places that need vast amounts of data stored for a very long time with restores being rare. Restoration is slow with tapes. Even a low end LTO drive will set you back thousands of £/$/€. Most consumers and even most businesses will find it more cost effective and flexible to backup to HDDs and storage clouds. Cheers, Andy -- https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web