Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #221266 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-04-12 10:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2020-04-30 05:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 196 — 39 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
Debian is testing Discourse Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-04-12 10:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-12 11:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-12 11:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2020-04-12 11:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2020-04-16 13:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-12 11:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-04-12 11:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-12 11:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-04-12 11:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Eike Lantzsch <zp6cge@gmx.net> - 2020-04-12 15:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-12 17:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2020-04-12 18:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 15:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 15:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-04-12 15:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 16:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2020-04-12 17:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Keith Christian <keith1christian@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 16:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-12 16:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 17:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2020-04-12 18:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Ihor Antonov <ihor@antonovs.family> - 2020-04-12 21:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-13 09:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-13 21:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-14 09:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2020-04-14 10:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-14 10:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2020-04-14 11:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-14 17:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-15 19:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-14 12:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-04-14 14:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-04-14 15:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2020-04-15 06:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-04-15 15:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-14 14:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-14 13:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-04-20 19:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-04-21 04:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-04-21 05:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-04-21 06:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-21 09:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2020-04-21 12:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-21 21:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-04-23 00:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-04-23 08:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-23 09:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-04-23 21:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Marco Möller <talby@debianlists.mobilxpress.net> - 2020-04-23 23:50 +0200
Contributing to Debian documentation [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-24 09:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-23 14:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-23 14:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-23 20:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-04-23 21:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Daniel Barclay <danielbarclay.oss@gmail.com> - 2020-04-29 18:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-29 18:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-29 21:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Daniel Barclay <danielbarclay.oss@gmail.com> - 2020-05-07 20:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-05-07 21:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-23 20:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2020-04-23 11:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-23 19:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-24 10:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-04-24 14:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-24 18:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-04-24 20:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-24 21:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2020-04-27 16:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Ihor Antonov <ngor@antonovs.family> - 2020-04-21 06:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-04-21 08:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 11:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2020-04-12 14:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> - 2020-04-12 14:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 15:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-12 15:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Keith Bainbridge <ke1th3216@zoho.com> - 2020-04-13 07:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2020-04-13 11:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-13 13:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse nito@dismail.de - 2020-04-12 15:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 17:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse nito@dismail.de - 2020-04-12 18:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2020-04-12 17:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2020-04-12 21:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-12 21:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Ihor Antonov <ihor@antonovs.family> - 2020-04-12 21:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2020-04-13 03:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-04-13 06:40 +0200
Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-13 09:20 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2020-04-13 10:30 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-13 10:40 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-13 11:00 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-13 11:00 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-13 11:10 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-13 11:50 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-04-13 18:00 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-13 22:10 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-04-13 22:20 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-13 15:30 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-13 15:30 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-13 17:40 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-13 22:10 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-14 09:30 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-14 14:20 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2020-04-13 11:00 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-13 13:40 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] soyeomul@doraji.xyz (황병희) - 2020-04-14 05:10 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-14 10:20 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-13 15:10 +0200
Re: Moderation (not!) [was: Debian is testing Discourse] Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-04-13 15:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Tom Dial <tddial@comcast.net> - 2020-04-13 23:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2020-04-14 11:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-14 14:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-04-14 15:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2020-04-14 16:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-14 17:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Carl Fink <carlf@panix.com> - 2020-04-14 17:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-14 18:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-14 19:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-14 20:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-04-14 20:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-14 20:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-15 08:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-15 10:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-14 17:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-14 17:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-14 17:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-13 09:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-13 10:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-13 10:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-13 14:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2020-04-13 14:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-13 17:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-04-13 18:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> - 2020-04-13 18:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-13 18:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-13 19:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-04-13 19:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-04-13 20:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2020-04-13 20:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-04-13 21:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-04-13 21:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-13 21:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-13 22:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2020-04-14 10:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-14 10:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-04-14 13:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-14 14:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-14 14:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> - 2020-04-13 21:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-13 21:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2020-04-13 22:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-13 22:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-13 22:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-04-13 22:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-14 09:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-04-14 13:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> - 2020-04-13 20:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-13 21:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-04-13 22:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-13 22:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-04-13 23:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-14 02:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2020-04-14 02:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Daniel Barclay <danielbarclay.oss@gmail.com> - 2020-04-29 19:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-04-29 20:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2020-04-29 21:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-29 21:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-04-29 22:10 +0200
Postel's principle [was: Debian is testing Discourse] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-29 22:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-04-30 00:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-04-30 02:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-04-30 00:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Daniel Barclay <danielbarclay.oss@gmail.com> - 2020-05-07 20:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-05-07 22:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-04-13 18:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-13 19:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-04-13 19:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2020-04-14 02:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-14 02:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2020-04-14 03:40 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-14 04:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-14 12:00 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-14 14:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-14 14:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-04-14 15:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-14 16:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> - 2020-04-13 20:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-13 20:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Glenn Holmer <glenn.holmer@gmail.com> - 2020-04-14 16:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2020-04-23 01:50 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Daniel Barclay <danielbarclay.oss@gmail.com> - 2020-04-29 19:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-29 19:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Daniel Barclay <danielbarclay.oss@gmail.com> - 2020-04-29 21:10 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-30 07:20 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-04-29 21:30 +0200
Re: Debian is testing Discourse Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2020-04-30 05:10 +0200
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
| From | Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-23 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zYGlb-sT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221802 |
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:07:55PM +0100, Brian wrote: >I do not have a TODO list, but pushing all wiki issues onto debian-www >probably wasn't the best of ideas. It seems to me that discourse would >be a good place to put them. I think the mistake was trying to drive discussion about the wiki *away* from the wiki. Pushing it to Discourse instead of debian-www@ would not be an improvement in that respect. >At the same time, what is the point of discusssion? A user thinks a >technical point on the wiki is wrong; they know it is wrong; they change >it. Where's the problem? Discussion pages serve as the place to discuss planning what goes where, explaining changes that might be obvious, asking questions about the content of a page e.g. phrasing to establish whether there's a mistake or something should be reworded for clarity, etc. Take a look at "Talk" pages on a large Mediawiki instance (E.g. Wikipedia) to see how they can be used. Here's an example <https://doomwiki.org/wiki/Talk:DOOM.WAD>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-23 19:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zYO93-52c-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221849 |
On Thu 23 Apr 2020 at 10:21:57 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:07:55PM +0100, Brian wrote: > > I do not have a TODO list, but pushing all wiki issues onto debian-www > > probably wasn't the best of ideas. It seems to me that discourse would > > be a good place to put them. > > I think the mistake was trying to drive discussion about the wiki *away* > from the wiki. Pushing it to Discourse instead of debian-www@ would not be > an improvement in that respect. > > > At the same time, what is the point of discusssion? A user thinks a > > technical point on the wiki is wrong; they know it is wrong; they change > > it. Where's the problem? > > Discussion pages serve as the place to discuss planning what goes where, > explaining changes that might be obvious, asking questions about the content > of a page e.g. phrasing to establish whether there's a mistake or something > should be reworded for clarity, etc. > > Take a look at "Talk" pages on a large Mediawiki instance (E.g. Wikipedia) > to see how they can be used. Here's an example > <https://doomwiki.org/wiki/Talk:DOOM.WAD> Discourse would provide a single point of contact for wiki discussion. That's a step up on what we have at present and is (I assume) very easy to implement. Does MoinMoin even allow for Discussion pages in an easy way? -- Brian.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-24 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zZ1zj-4Ug-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221868 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Jo, 23 apr 20, 18:43:25, Brian wrote: > > Discourse would provide a single point of contact for wiki discussion. > That's a step up on what we have at present and is (I assume) very easy > to implement. > > Does MoinMoin even allow for Discussion pages in an easy way? It's easy to add. The FAQ in my signature has an example, probably just copied from some other page. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-24 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zZ5CV-7ee-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221897 |
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:59:50AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Jo, 23 apr 20, 18:43:25, Brian wrote: > > > > Discourse would provide a single point of contact for wiki discussion. > > That's a step up on what we have at present and is (I assume) very easy > > to implement. > > > > Does MoinMoin even allow for Discussion pages in an easy way? > > It's easy to add. The FAQ in my signature has an example, probably just > copied from some other page. > http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser The raw text on the page in question includes this table: ||<tablestyle="width: 100%;" style="border: 0px hidden">~-Translation(s): English - [[it/FAQsFromDebianUser|Italiano]] - [[fr/FAQsFromDebianUser|Français]]-~||<style="text-align: right;border: 0px hidden"> (!) [[/Discussion|Discussion]]|| In other words, the page author(s) added the link to a "Discussion" subpage manually for this page only. This would have to be done for each page where you would like people to contribute to a Discussion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-24 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zZ9Gy-18v-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221900 |
On Fri 24 Apr 2020 at 08:24:44 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:59:50AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Jo, 23 apr 20, 18:43:25, Brian wrote: > > > > > > Discourse would provide a single point of contact for wiki discussion. > > > That's a step up on what we have at present and is (I assume) very easy > > > to implement. > > > > > > Does MoinMoin even allow for Discussion pages in an easy way? > > > > It's easy to add. The FAQ in my signature has an example, probably just > > copied from some other page. > > > http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser > > The raw text on the page in question includes this table: > > ||<tablestyle="width: 100%;" style="border: 0px hidden">~-Translation(s): English - [[it/FAQsFromDebianUser|Italiano]] - [[fr/FAQsFromDebianUser|Français]]-~||<style="text-align: right;border: 0px hidden"> (!) [[/Discussion|Discussion]]|| > > In other words, the page author(s) added the link to a "Discussion" > subpage manually for this page only. This would have to be done for > each page where you would like people to contribute to a Discussion. Indeed it would. But useful nevertheless, surely? -- Brian.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rhkramer@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-24 20:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zZb5D-26u-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221906 |
On Friday, April 24, 2020 12:40:56 PM Brian wrote: > On Fri 24 Apr 2020 at 08:24:44 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:59:50AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > On Jo, 23 apr 20, 18:43:25, Brian wrote: > > > > Does MoinMoin even allow for Discussion pages in an easy way? > > > > > > It's easy to add. The FAQ in my signature has an example, probably just > > > copied from some other page. > > > > > > http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser > > > > The raw text on the page in question includes this table: > > ||<tablestyle="width: 100%;" style="border: 0px hidden">~-Translation(s): > > ||English - [[it/FAQsFromDebianUser|Italiano]] - > > ||[[fr/FAQsFromDebianUser|Français]]-~||<style="text-align: > > ||right;border: 0px hidden"> (!) [[/Discussion|Discussion]]|| > > > > In other words, the page author(s) added the link to a "Discussion" > > subpage manually for this page only. This would have to be done for > > each page where you would like people to contribute to a Discussion. > > Indeed it would. But useful nevertheless, surely? And, if MoinMoin allows templates to start new pages (some wikis do -- Foswiki / TWiki for instance), the template could contain the text / code to create a link to a discussion page (and maybe create the discussion page, as well, which in many wikis just requires that a link to even a non-existent page will create that page on clicking the link (Foswiki / TWiki again).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-24 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zZc1I-2F3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221907 |
On Fri 24 Apr 2020 at 14:13:49 -0400, rhkramer@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, April 24, 2020 12:40:56 PM Brian wrote: > > On Fri 24 Apr 2020 at 08:24:44 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:59:50AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > On Jo, 23 apr 20, 18:43:25, Brian wrote: > > > > > Does MoinMoin even allow for Discussion pages in an easy way? > > > > > > > > It's easy to add. The FAQ in my signature has an example, probably just > > > > copied from some other page. > > > > > > > > http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser > > > > > > The raw text on the page in question includes this table: > > > ||<tablestyle="width: 100%;" style="border: 0px hidden">~-Translation(s): > > > ||English - [[it/FAQsFromDebianUser|Italiano]] - > > > ||[[fr/FAQsFromDebianUser|Français]]-~||<style="text-align: > > > ||right;border: 0px hidden"> (!) [[/Discussion|Discussion]]|| > > > > > > In other words, the page author(s) added the link to a "Discussion" > > > subpage manually for this page only. This would have to be done for > > > each page where you would like people to contribute to a Discussion. > > > > Indeed it would. But useful nevertheless, surely? > > And, if MoinMoin allows templates to start new pages (some wikis do -- Foswiki > / TWiki for instance), the template could contain the text / code to create a > link to a discussion page (and maybe create the discussion page, as well, > which in many wikis just requires that a link to even a non-existent page will > create that page on clicking the link (Foswiki / TWiki again). I think MoinMoin does allow that, so those who want discussion can set it up and sit back and talk. The claimed overwhelming quality of the Arch Wiki pages, as promoted by a number of users, has yet to be substantiated. -- Brian.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-27 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <A0csF-72f-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221912 |
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 08:11:34PM +0100, Brian wrote: >I think MoinMoin does allow that, so those who want discussion can set >it up and sit back and talk. A MoinMoin instance that I used to be involved with in the past had automatic Discussion links on all pages, possibly via a plugin. >The claimed overwhelming quality of the Arch Wiki pages, as promoted by >a number of users, has yet to be substantiated. How would you go about proving that? It's surely enough that the Arch Wiki has a reputation for quality (evidenced by, as you put it, it being promoted by a number of users here, a non-Arch community), whereas the Debian Wiki does not. -- Jonathan Dowland
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ihor Antonov <ngor@antonovs.family> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-21 06:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zXSRr-4cj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221774 |
I am not sure why we are discussing this is in a discourse thread, but what the heck. > > In my experience, the content of the Arch wiki is ofter far superior to > ours, not just the organization and structure. > > ... > > > So they have different philosophies. Perhaps Debian puts more effort > > into the packages themselves, the installer, and documentation like > > the Reference Manual, Release Notes etc, whereas AIUI Arch relies > > > more on its wiki. And I think Debian has a much broader scope: > But the Debian documentation you mention doesn't cover a great deal > of practical, real-world areas of system configuration, maintenance, > and use, at least not in any useful, up-to-date way. The Arch wiki, in > my experience, simply does a much better job at documenting this sort of > stuff than any Debian documentation. As a former Arch user I second that opinion. The wiki is better structured, has better contents and is easy to edit anyway. Archlinux wiki is the primary, if not the only, source of the documentation, so all the effort is concentrated there. I would love to get better navigation / search in Debian wiki, some sort of side bar would not be amiss. What do you think can be done to make Debian wiki more usable and more attractive to users/editors? ------------------- Ihor Antonov
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-21 08:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zXUqe-5ex-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221777 |
Ihor Antonov wrote: > As a former Arch user I second that opinion. The wiki is better > structured, has better contents and is easy to edit anyway. Archlinux wiki > is the primary, if not the only, source of the documentation, so all the > effort is concentrated there. > I can second that - for general Linux question I use very often the arch wiki. For Debian usually google & co give the right page, but very often as mentioned structure or content is not that good or contemporary.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-12 11:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zUGD8-7zR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221266 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Du, 12 apr 20, 11:45:02, Reco wrote: > Dear list, > > [1] came to my attention today. To quote relevant parts: > > What about the mailing lists? > This may or may not be a replacement for any particular list. I > suspect there are some thet would benefit greatly from having Discourse > be the primary interaction, and other places where this would be less > suitable. [...] > So, thoughts, options? Interesting. At least at this point my preference will depend a lot on (the limitations of) the e-mail interface (didn't look into that yet). Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-12 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zUJAZ-18Y-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221266 |
Hello, On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:45:02AM +0300, Reco wrote: > So, thoughts, options? I am really glad that Debian is investigating this option and I look forward to answering (and asking!) typical debian-user questions there. I hope that fellow debian-user regulars will give it a try with an open mind. Cheers, Andy -- https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-12 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zUK42-1iV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221285 |
On 12/04/2020 13:09, Andy Smith wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:45:02AM +0300, Reco wrote: >> So, thoughts, options? > I am really glad that Debian is investigating this option and I look > forward to answering (and asking!) typical debian-user questions > there. I hope that fellow debian-user regulars will give it a try > with an open mind. > > Cheers, > Andy > Just another cog in the Debian control wheel. Pass me that woolly cardigan and those sandals please ... I still remember when Debian was for the community. -- Michael Howard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-12 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zUKQp-1P2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221287 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Du, 12 apr 20, 13:31:27, Michael Howard wrote: > > I still remember when Debian was for the community. In my opinion it still is, though the community probably changed. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-12 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zUL9N-1VT-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221285 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 12:09:10PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:45:02AM +0300, Reco wrote: > > So, thoughts, options? > > I am really glad that Debian is investigating this option and I look > forward to answering (and asking!) typical debian-user questions > there. I hope that fellow debian-user regulars will give it a try > with an open mind. I have the chance to test it (elsewhere). I thoroughly dislike it. My mind ain't open anymore. Cheers -- t
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keith Bainbridge <ke1th3216@zoho.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-13 07:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zUZw5-2xm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221285 |
On 12/4/20 10:09 pm, Andy Smith wrote: > I am really glad that Debian is investigating this option and I look > forward to answering (and asking!) typical debian-user questions > there. I hope that fellow debian-user regulars will give it a try > with an open mind. OK I might give it a try - but my history with fora that are available in browser is that I forget to go look at what is happening; even when I ask a question. At least with email, I get a prompt to look at un-read mail. If the interface is as good as google mail in browser, I won't last long; maybe 2 minutes. -- Keith Bainbridge ke1th3216@zoho.com +61 (0)447 667 468
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-13 11:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zV3T4-52i-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221360 |
Hi Keith, On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 02:45:33PM +1000, Keith Bainbridge wrote: > I might give it a try - but my history with fora that are > available in browser is that I forget to go look at what is > happening; even when I ask a question. At least with email, I get > a prompt to look at un-read mail. It is pretty good about notifying you by email about important things like replies, but you may want to go to your notification preferences and enable "mailing list mode", and then you would get an email copy of everything. The email copies have proper threading and can be replied to by email, although they are unfortunately all HTML mail. Most of the Discourse instances I care about are followed in mailing list mode and read in my Mutt client as like you I don't want to miss posts. Cheers, Andy -- https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-13 13:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zV5Bw-67X-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221360 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Apr 13, 2020, Keith Bainbridge wrote: > [...] > If the interface is as good as google mail in browser, I won't last long; > maybe 2 minutes. It makes gmail look good. -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nito@dismail.de |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-12 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zUL9M-1VT-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221266 |
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:45:02 +0300, Reco wrote: > Why are you doing this? > […] Secondly, I genuinely believe that ease of access to new > contributors is of paramount importance to the project. I'd say a mailing list is actually way *more* accessible, than some web forum (esp. with javascript). For one thing virtually everyone already has an email, so no additional accounts/pw need to be managed. Furthermore customising the display of plain text emails to fit your needs is easy, while doing the same with discourse requires more work and knowledge – or might not be feasible for the non-text elements of discourse. (E.g. increasing font size and contrast to make up for bad eyesight, using different fonts due to preference or to help with dyslexia etc ) > Be specific! > Ok... I think *debian-user*, debian-vote and possibly debian-project > would be better off in Discourse. […] While I'm not eligible to vote in debian matters, I'd say that *especially* debian-vote should *not* be in discourse. One reason is the accessibility mentioned above, another reason is that I believe the absence of likes etc on debian-votes to be a *good* thing. This helps to avoid influencing the readers and gives all proposals a fairer chance. Let's say supporters of one proposal are primarily using discourse and all like the proposal, while another proposal has roughly the same amount of supporters, but the supporters are using the mail interface and can't like/don't see a point in liking. This will distort perceived support for the proposals. Also I think that taking the time to write down what you believe to be good/bad about a proposal instead of +1/-1 helps everyone to get a better picture on the situation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-04-12 17:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zUMyR-2Vq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #221299 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Du, 12 apr 20, 15:48:08, nito@dismail.de wrote: > > > Be specific! > > Ok... I think *debian-user*, debian-vote and possibly debian-project > > would be better off in Discourse. […] > While I'm not eligible to vote in debian matters, I'd say that *especially* > debian-vote should *not* be in discourse. > One reason is the accessibility mentioned above, another reason is that I > believe the absence of likes etc on debian-votes to be a *good* thing. This > helps to avoid influencing the readers and gives all proposals a fairer chance. It also makes it too easy to influence and/or derail the discussion, e.g. by attrition, trolling, etc. > Let's say supporters of one proposal are primarily using discourse and all like > the proposal, while another proposal has roughly the same amount of supporters, > but the supporters are using the mail interface and can't like/don't see a point > in liking. > This will distort perceived support for the proposals. The rules for submitting or sponsoring actual voting proposals / amendments etc. are clearly laid out, I don't see any danger here. The discussion of the proposals and/or amendments however tends to become very chaotic on controversial issues. > Also I think that taking the time to write down what you believe to be > good/bad about a proposal instead of +1/-1 helps everyone to get a better > picture on the situation. What if someone else already wrote that, possibly in better words than I could? Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web