Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #220778
| From | Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: [OT] testing on unstable sources list |
| Date | 2020-04-01 17:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zQNMS-2W8-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <zPHqa-2ER-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <zPLk6-52A-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <zQ09s-5Ok-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <zQ0M9-6gU-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zQKYF-17c-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Mi, 01 apr 20, 15:49:25, dalios wrote: > On 3/30/20 2:26 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > >> [...] and still retain testing in sources.list (having testing in > > sources.list when running unstable is a good idea anyway). > > Can you be so kind and explain to me how is that a good idea? I am > _definitely not_ as knowledgeable as you are, but that sounds strange > enough to make me wonder what have I missed... > > I have only tried unstable twice and only on secondary machines, just > for experimenting. This question is only for learning purpose. The recommendation is based on the statement of a Debian Release Manager some years ago[1]. Basically it may happen that a particular package is removed from unstable, which will also affect other packages that depend on it. With testing in sources.list the package can be installed from there instead. Because apt[2] by default prefers newer versions of a package, if a package is available in unstable and testing with different versions the unstable version will be preferred. So the only downsides I can think of would be slightly longer download times on 'apt update' and possibly a late alert that a specific package is being removed from Debian (typically packages are removed from testing first, but it may happen the other way around as well). [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/03/msg00582.html [2] and other package managers like aptitude, etc. Hope this explains, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye Martin <mb0087@gmail.com> - 2020-03-29 00:00 +0100
Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-29 08:00 +0200
Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye Martin <mb0087@gmail.com> - 2020-03-29 12:40 +0200
Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-29 13:40 +0200
Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye Martin <mb0087@gmail.com> - 2020-03-29 16:50 +0200
Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-29 21:00 +0200
Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye Martin <mb0087@gmail.com> - 2020-03-30 12:50 +0200
Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-30 13:30 +0200
Re: [OT] testing on unstable sources list dalios <dalios@eumx.net> - 2020-04-01 14:50 +0200
Re: [OT] testing on unstable sources list Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-01 17:50 +0200
Re: [OT] testing on unstable sources list dalios <dalios@eumx.net> - 2020-04-02 09:00 +0200
Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye Martin <mb0087@gmail.com> - 2020-03-29 12:40 +0200
csiph-web