Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #211705

Re: buster, ekiga.

From <tomas@tuxteam.de>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: buster, ekiga.
Date 2019-07-24 19:30 +0200
Message-ID <yntfr-4Uj-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <yn4qJ-5ZU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <yn4Ap-6iX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ynnto-1hj-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ynqAW-35l-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ynt5L-4Pg-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 01:10:49PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 09:29:47AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> >However, I would not award +1 to the MUAs that, we are told,
> >truncate the message, or even just the line, at the first
> >NUL byte. That could yield a message with a very different sense
> >from what the sender wrote.
> 
> And that is what happens when you do something that is out of spec
> for the protocol--the recipient's behavior is undefined and possibly
> suboptimal. (A NUL is specifically disallowed per RFC 2822.)

But never forget the Postel Principle. In RFC land, nasal daemons
are frowned upon ;-)

Cheers
-- t

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: buster, ekiga. peter@easthope.ca - 2019-07-23 17:00 +0200
  Re: buster, ekiga. Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-07-23 17:10 +0200
    Re: buster, ekiga. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-07-23 18:40 +0200
    Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-07-23 21:20 +0200
      Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-07-23 21:30 +0200
      Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-07-23 21:40 +0200
        Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga. Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-07-23 23:00 +0200
      Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga. Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-07-23 21:40 +0200
        Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-07-23 22:10 +0200
      Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga. Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-07-23 21:40 +0200
        Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-07-25 18:40 +0200
    Re: buster, ekiga. rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-07-24 13:20 +0200
      Re: buster, ekiga. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-07-24 16:40 +0200
        Re: buster, ekiga. Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-07-24 19:20 +0200
          Re: buster, ekiga. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-07-24 19:30 +0200
            Re: buster, ekiga. Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-07-24 20:00 +0200
              Re: buster, ekiga. Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-07-24 23:00 +0200
              Re: buster, ekiga. Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2019-07-24 23:00 +0200
                Re: buster, ekiga. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-07-24 23:10 +0200
              Re: buster, ekiga. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-07-24 23:00 +0200
                Re: buster, ekiga. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-07-24 23:10 +0200
                Re: buster, ekiga. Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-07-24 23:20 +0200
                Re: buster, ekiga. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-07-24 23:30 +0200
                Re: buster, ekiga. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-07-25 18:40 +0200
                Re: buster, ekiga. Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-07-25 13:40 +0200
  Re: buster, ekiga. Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2019-07-23 17:30 +0200

csiph-web