Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #211608
| From | Shahryar Afifi <shahryarafifi@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Hibernation takes too long |
| Date | 2019-07-21 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ymlaj-3dv-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <ylZjr-6vh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ym7K1-3nO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ym8d3-3xI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ymaeR-4TI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ymkQW-372-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
What is the proportional size between RAM and swap? On Sun, 2019-07-21 at 10:19 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Afaik it's advised to copy files to SSDs and not copy blockwise > > (dd) because > > layouts can differ very much and performance would suffer. > > As long as the filesystem is properly aligned on a 4KB boundary, I > don't > think there'll be any noticeable difference. I highly doubt this > explains the 2 minutes needed to hibernate. > > > > At idle, only 1.2 Gb of RAM is occupied, so not all the 12GB > > > should be > > > moved to SSD. > > > > The 6 GB of RAM will be moved to the swap partition. > > No, only the occupied part of the RAM, and not even all of it (the > parts that correspond to memory-mapped files (e.g. libraries and > executables)) won't, for example. So we're likely taking about less > than 1GB in this 1.2GB case. > > > That's why swap needs to be >= RAM for hibernating. > > Actually, this is neither necessary nor sufficient: > - the RAM can't be saved into the part of the swap already used, so > the > rule should be "the unused part of the swap >= RAM" in order for > the > rule to be sufficient. > - as mentioned about, not all the RAM needs to be saved to swap, and > furthermore, hibernation usually compresses the data before saving > it > into the swap space, so it typically needs significantly less than > the > RAM (I'd expect a compression in the order of 3x). > > > The X61 will throttle SSD throughput as it has less bandwidth than > > modern > > SATA adapters. So, transferring those 6 GB > > will take time... > > 1GB/3 is about 300MB, which shouldn't take more than 10s to save. > > > Stefan >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hibernation takes too long Shahryar Afifi <shahryarafifi@yahoo.com> - 2019-07-20 06:50 +0200
Re: Hibernation takes too long Carl Fink <carlf@panix.com> - 2019-07-20 15:30 +0200
Re: Hibernation takes too long Shahryar Afifi <shahryarafifi@yahoo.com> - 2019-07-20 17:20 +0200
Re: Hibernation takes too long Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2019-07-21 02:20 +0200
Re: Hibernation takes too long Shahryar Afifi <shahryarafifi@yahoo.com> - 2019-07-21 02:50 +0200
Re: Hibernation takes too long Michael Kesper <mkesper@schokokeks.org> - 2019-07-21 05:00 +0200
Re: Hibernation takes too long Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2019-07-21 16:20 +0200
Re: Hibernation takes too long Shahryar Afifi <shahryarafifi@yahoo.com> - 2019-07-21 16:40 +0200
Re: Hibernation takes too long Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2019-07-21 18:50 +0200
Re: Hibernation takes too long Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com> - 2019-07-21 20:10 +0200
Re: Hibernation takes too long Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2019-07-22 16:00 +0200
Re: Hibernation takes too long Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2019-07-23 10:30 +0200
Re: Hibernation takes too long Carl Fink <carlf@panix.com> - 2019-07-21 04:10 +0200
[Solved] [Fwd: Hibernation takes too long] Shahryar Afifi <shahryarafifi@yahoo.com> - 2019-07-30 17:50 +0200
csiph-web