Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #210459
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Function similar to {apt-cache recurse ...}? |
| Date | 2019-06-28 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ydZzY-4mr-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ydYNz-460-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ydZzY-4mr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 08:50:02AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 28 Jun 2019 at 08:04:43 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> > "apt-get install" will report the size of the new files to be
> > installed when it asks for confirmation.
> >
> > I'm looking for something similar which will base its calculation
> > *ONLY* on the contents of /var/lib/apt/lists/ {ignoring what is
> > already on the current system}.
>
> I thought it already did; I posted this here six days ago:
>
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> … … … …
> 9 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 52.5 MB/52.5 MB of archives.
> After this operation, 74.8 kB of additional disk space will be used.
> ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑ ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
>
> If that's not what you mean, ask your question again avoiding words
> like "similar" and "based on".
I read the OP's question as "the total installed size including
dependencies" -- assuming none of those dependencies has been
installed before (ex nihilo, so to speak).
While that question sounds reasonable, it is not -- do you count
the base system, for exampla? That means "installed size" is
/always/ relative to some "base installation".
But perhaps my interpretation is wrong.
Cheers
-- tomás
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Function similar to {apt-cache recurse ...}? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2019-06-28 15:10 +0200
Re: Function similar to {apt-cache recurse ...}? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-06-28 16:00 +0200
Re: Function similar to {apt-cache recurse ...}? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2019-06-28 16:30 +0200
Re: Function similar to {apt-cache recurse ...}? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-06-28 16:40 +0200
Re: Function similar to {apt-cache recurse ...}? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-06-28 17:30 +0200
Re: Function similar to {apt-cache recurse ...}? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-06-28 18:20 +0200
Re: Function similar to {apt-cache recurse ...}? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-07-01 03:50 +0200
Re: Function similar to {apt-cache recurse ...}? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-06-28 16:00 +0200
Re: Function similar to {apt-cache recurse ...}? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2019-06-28 16:00 +0200
Re: Function similar to {apt-cache recurse ...}? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-06-28 16:10 +0200
csiph-web