Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #204252

Re: Taming the "lsblk" command

From mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Taming the "lsblk" command
Date 2019-01-09 17:20 +0100
Message-ID <xeoKd-4p7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <xeehP-6rN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xeh62-8bp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xelCG-2i4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <xemyJ-2RP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <xemS6-3e7-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2019-01-09 14:14, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 09 Jan 2019 at 13:54:45 (+0000), Curt wrote:
>> On 2019-01-09, rhkramer@gmail.com <rhkramer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, January 09, 2019 03:01:42 AM Richard Hector wrote:
>> >> On 9/01/19 6:04 PM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>> >> > lsblk -l -o name,label | sort | script
>> >>
>> >> lsblk -ln -o name,label |sort | <script>
>> >
>> > I'm not the OP, but I very much like the way you put script in angle brackets
>> > to show that is a parameter (mcow) and not a literal value!!
>> 
>> I'll see that affection for mundane angle brackets and raise you the
>> annoyance of not having received the vaguest clue as to what might be
>> found literally inside them (the pertinent part, at the very least).
> 
> I don't think the OP told us what the script was, but just that they
> want to pipe the output into "a script". Using angle brackets from the
> start (or knowing that script itself is a program) would have avoided
> the mess in the other subthread.
> 
> Cheers,
> David.

/usr/bin/script looks like it might be handy sometime ( didn't know 
about that )
there's a line in the answers to clean up the output.
https://superuser.com/questions/236930/how-to-clean-up-output-of-linux-script-command

mick



-- 
Key ID    4BFEBB31

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Taming the "lsblk" command Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2019-01-08 22:00 +0100
  Re: Taming the "lsblk" command Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-01-08 22:20 +0100
  Re: Taming the "lsblk" command Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2019-01-09 06:10 +0100
    Re: Taming the "lsblk" command Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2019-01-09 07:30 +0100
    Re: Taming the "lsblk" command Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2019-01-09 07:50 +0100
      Re: Taming the "lsblk" command Bob McGowan <ramjr0915@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 08:00 +0100
      Re: Taming the "lsblk" command Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2019-01-09 12:50 +0100
        Re: Taming the "lsblk" command Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2019-01-09 14:00 +0100
          Re: Taming the "lsblk" command David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-01-09 15:30 +0100
    Re: Taming the "lsblk" command Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2019-01-09 09:10 +0100
      Re: Taming the "lsblk" command rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-01-09 14:00 +0100
        Re: Taming the "lsblk" command Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-01-09 15:00 +0100
          Re: Taming the "lsblk" command David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-01-09 15:20 +0100
            Re: Taming the "lsblk" command Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2019-01-09 16:40 +0100
              Re: Taming the "lsblk" command Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-01-09 18:00 +0100
            Re: Taming the "lsblk" command mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 17:20 +0100
              Re: Taming the "lsblk" command David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-01-09 20:10 +0100
                Re: Taming the "lsblk" command Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-01-09 22:40 +0100
                Re: Taming the "lsblk" command David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-01-10 02:00 +0100
                Re: Taming the "lsblk" command Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-01-10 13:50 +0100

csiph-web