Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #203899
| From | Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? |
| Date | 2019-01-03 21:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xchtw-7Xa-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <xc6eJ-1df-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <xc8zU-2z7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Le 03/01/2019 à 11:35, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : > On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 12:07:21AM -0800, John Conover wrote: >> I'm want to format a "standard" 16G/32G SD card to OEM format. What is "OEM format" ? >> Could someone please verify that the following will do this: >> >> mkdosfs -I /dev/sdX >> fdisk /dev/sdX n,p,1,default,default,w >> mkfs.vfat /dev/sdX1 >> >> It seems to work, but could someone please verify that its correct? > > The "mkdosfs" seems to be superfluous, to me. It does not seem to, it is. It may also cause a lot of confusion if enough of the FAT boot sector is left untouched by the partition table. Also, note that mkdosfs is the same as mkfs.vfat. > As far as I can see, that > will put a FAT16 filesystem directly onto the device. No, the FAT type is chosen from the device size unless explicitly specified. 16 or 32 GB will select FAT32. > You then write a MBR-type filesystem Nonsense. You mean a partition table or disk label. > and then a FAT32 filesystem into the sole partition. Because the FAT type is chosen from the device size. Not because the command is invoked as mkfs.vfat. VFAT has nothing to do with FAT32, it just adds support for long file names on top of any FAT type and is only a mount-time feature. > That said the documentation for mkdosfs "-I" is pretty unclear so > perhaps it's doing something that you intend and I have missed. -I forces mkdosfs to accept a whole unpartitioned device.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? conover@rahul.net (John Conover) - 2019-01-03 09:10 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2019-01-03 11:40 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2019-01-03 21:10 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2019-01-04 11:00 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-01-04 14:40 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2019-01-04 17:30 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-01-04 17:40 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-01-05 05:00 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-01-04 17:40 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2019-01-04 18:50 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2019-01-04 20:10 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-01-05 10:30 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2019-01-05 10:40 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-01-05 12:00 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2019-01-07 13:30 +0100
typos (was: Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card?) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-01-05 04:20 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-01-05 04:20 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-01-05 04:40 +0100
Re: Formatting a 32G or 16G SD card? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-01-05 10:10 +0100
csiph-web