Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #208687
| From | Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | LXC, networking and firewalling |
| Date | 2019-05-16 03:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <xYdnA-4lc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi all, I have a couple of VPSes (Xen and KVM based), in which I run LXC containers. Currently I have a bridge device set up on the host (not bridged to the external network), and iptables to do firewalling and NAT as required. Here's my bridge setup, if that helps: ---------------8<------------ auto br0 iface br0 inet static bridge_ports none bridge_fd 0 bridge_maxwait 0 address 192.168.123.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 iface br0 inet6 static address fd49:5bcf:0bed:5d9c::1/64 ---------------8<------------ What I think doesn't work so well is attempting to filter traffic either between containers, or between a container and the host. Also, ISTR people saying iptables shouldn't be used on a bridge at all. So before I set up my next VPS (and possibly reconfigure my older one(s)), is there a better way I should be considering? Do I need to use ebtables on the bridge? Will that work between containers? Would I be better off using multiple bridges? As an aside, if I get access to VLANs from my provider (I don't think I've ever (successfully) configured VLANs on Linux before), I assume I can include a VLAN in each bridge, and I guess leave the default one out? Thanks, Richard
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
LXC, networking and firewalling Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2019-05-16 03:30 +0200 Re: LXC, networking and firewalling Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-05-16 07:50 +0200
csiph-web