Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #208294
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: next amd64 stretch problem |
| Date | Mon, 06 May 2019 17:50:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <xUO2l-82W-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <xUAiK-84X-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xUGRb-3NV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <xUNpD-7Pj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Mon May 6 15:41:38 2019 |
| Old-Return-Path | <gheskett@shentel.net> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-5.899 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DIGITS_LETTERS=1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate:hard: -4.7 |
| X-Asg-Debug-ID | 1557157283-0ea5c10ba915dd7f0001-KlT975 |
| X-Barracuda-Envelope-From | gheskett@shentel.net |
| X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP | UNKNOWN[204.111.64.149] |
| X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP | 204.111.64.149 |
| Organization | none,nada,zip |
| X-Asg-Orig-Subj | Re: next amd64 stretch problem |
| User-Agent | KMail/1.9.10 |
| X-Kmail-Quoteprefix | > |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-Barracuda-Connect | UNKNOWN[172.26.51.4] |
| X-Barracuda-Start-Time | 1557157283 |
| X-Barracuda-URL | https://172.26.193.44:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi |
| X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size | 2464 |
| X-Barracuda-Brts-Status | 1 |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Score | 0.50 |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Status | No, SCORE=0.50 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=WEIRD_PORT |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Report | Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.70895 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.50 WEIRD_PORT URI: Uses non-standard port number for HTTP |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/748341 |
| List-ID | <debian-user.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/201905061141.22420.gheskett@shentel.net |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 65 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Mon, 6 May 2019 11:41:22 -0400 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <201905061141.22420.gheskett@shentel.net> |
| X-Original-References | <201905052104.18120.gheskett@shentel.net> <155712994665.8327.4088160703993406798@auryn.jones.dk> <201905061106.34332.gheskett@shentel.net> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.user:208294 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Monday 06 May 2019 11:06:34 am Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 06 May 2019 04:05:46 am Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > [...] > > > In recent times, Pulseaudio "hijacks" direct ALSA access by > > registering with ALSA as a virtual audio card, which reroutes > > through its pipeline and then sending out audio through the real > > audio card. > > > > You can force avoid Pulseaudio by starting an application like this > > from a terminal: > > > > pasuspender -- speaker-test > > which gets me total silence, except for a low level beep from kmail > (trinity version r14.0.6) as mail is incoming. What does that tell > us? > > I'm a dummy about such, so please carry on. > > > If that makes audio louder, then you have identified that you > > generally use Pulseaudio and it is dampening: Look for Pulseaudio > > tools and turn the (many many many!) knobs in there... > > > > Here are some of the Pulseaudio tools you could try: > > > > pulsemixer (text-based) > > pamix (text-based) > > pavucontrol (graphical) > > paman (graphical - not volume control but other settings) > > pasystray (puts pavucontrol and paman into system tray) > > I installed all opf these that synaptic could find, pavucontrol came up and I turned everyting wide open, and haven't heard a thing since. I think I should remove all of pulse, alsa used to just work. AV97 sound on this mobo. Other suggestions? FF, sent to foxnews or to youtube, is frozen with a circular waiting icon in motion forever now when asked to play a video at either site. So I can't even watch the hand waving. > > > > If messing with Pulseaudio doesn't work for kmail then try look into > > KDE settings or try locate other ways to configure Phonon - or > > perhaps try remove the phonon backend packages you don't want: > > Modern KDE applications (those linked with Qt5) can use either of > > the packages phonon4qt5-backend-vlc phonon4qt5-backend-gstreamer > > phonon4qt5-backend-null, and older KDE applications (those linked > > with Qt4) can use either of the packages phonon-backend-vlc > > phonon-backend-gstreamer phonon-backend-null. > > > > > > Good luck :-) > > > > - Jonas > > Cheers, Gene Heskett Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
next amd64 stretch problem Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-06 03:10 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-05-06 07:00 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-06 08:50 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-06 10:10 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-06 17:10 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-06 17:50 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-06 17:50 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-06 19:20 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem Jan Claeys <lists@janc.be> - 2019-05-09 20:40 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2019-05-09 22:10 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-05-06 09:40 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-06 17:20 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-06 20:10 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem ghe <ghe@slsware.net> - 2019-05-06 20:40 +0200
Re: next amd64 stretch problem Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-05-06 23:50 +0200
csiph-web