Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #208058

Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode?

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode?
Date Thu, 02 May 2019 23:40:02 +0200
Message-ID <xTrAS-6Li-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <xS15L-2HQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xTjDk-1ZV-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <xTjWF-26J-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <xTpSq-5FN-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Thu May 2 21:33:30 2019
Old-Return-Path <invernomuto@paranoici.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-12.1 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1; rate: -4.6
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paranoici.org; s=stigmate; t=1556832796; bh=ONg8zqVR9REUgksrSwysC410dJMr+qPvQwCCwWcjDlQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=fEowqEHChauD+8q/GriTnAG+lgHXTIYW5c/LufI0tANr6l06EjymSXJ2zuuYSuqXW tuLlOwHs0kwKLHuetEVBR3XR3dRojE4TVMq04SmLQ5TzaOGetwFbw+fUczHkm7fd6B 9F/Um3he8f7pDNL/kW1cKMzIrY75Dj5MzRy7Yqlk=
X-Mailer Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__2_May_2019_23_33_06_+0200_KCjHPQ2FKxi=8Iof"
X-Mailing-List <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/748101
List-ID <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20190502233306.178a139c8938a1b88e06d1e0@paranoici.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 61
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Thu, 2 May 2019 23:33:06 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <20190502233306.178a139c8938a1b88e06d1e0@paranoici.org>
X-Original-References <alpine.DEB.2.20.1904281840500.10073@debian> <20190502150454.727b33c8@tag.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> <155680365057.8327.6496093278985328248@auryn.jones.dk> <02052019201942.674d8a6c772e@desktop.copernicus.org.uk>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.user:208058

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Thu, 2 May 2019 20:49:28 +0100 Brian wrote:

[...]
> In #917569
> 
>   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917569
> 
> Francesco Poli treats upgrading one buster Soekris net5501 installation
> to another one. This implies he might very well have been running that
> device on stretch. Or, for that matter, running on a previous buster.
> 
> I have previously found Francesco to be very co-operative, so I have put
> him in a Cc:.

Hello!  :-)
I am afraid I will disappoint you a bit this time...   :-p

The only thing I can say is that I run Debian testing on my Soekris
net5501. The box has always tracked Debian testing, hence it only used
to run stretch when stretch was testing (that is to say, *before*
stretch was released as stable). It currently runs an updated buster
(== current Debian testing) and the Linux kernel is able to boot.

I don't know whether the bug I reported (#917569) against
linux/4.19.12-1 corresponds to the same issue that Björn is
experiencing with linux/4.9.168-1 (#928340)...

I am sorry I cannot be of more help.

-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2019-04-29 01:10 +0200
  Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2019-04-29 07:50 +0200
    Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-29 10:00 +0200
      Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Thomas Pircher <thp+debian@p5r.uk> - 2019-04-29 10:10 +0200
        Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2019-04-29 10:40 +0200
          Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Thomas Pircher <thp+debian@p5r.uk> - 2019-04-29 13:20 +0200
        Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-29 14:40 +0200
  Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Björn Persson <Bjorn@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> - 2019-05-02 15:10 +0200
    Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-02 15:30 +0200
      Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2019-05-02 21:50 +0200
        Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> - 2019-05-02 23:40 +0200
          Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Brian Potkin <brian@copernicus.org.uk> - 2019-05-03 21:50 +0200
    Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2019-05-02 23:30 +0200
      Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Björn Persson <Bjorn@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> - 2019-05-05 18:00 +0200
        Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2019-05-05 19:40 +0200

csiph-web