Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #206533
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices |
| Date | 2019-03-24 04:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xF1Gh-49L-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <xEyuB-2Zk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xEAG5-4td-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xEAZr-4zk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xEItX-Rt-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <xEKm5-21U-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat 23 Mar 2019 at 04:39:21 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote: > deloptes composed on 2019-03-23 07:29 (UTC+0100): > > Felix Miata wrote: > > >> IME, using net.ifnames=0, the motherboard NIC closer to an ATX power > >> supply is always eth0. With BTX I've never had two NICs, but have to > >> suppose it would be the opposite. I think PCI(e) resources flow the same > >> direction, from CPU & PS/2 port end to last slot end. > > > interesting theory, but I must disappoint you that it is not true. Usually > > it is from the left to the right. It has nothing to do with the ATX, except > > if it would be on the left. > > What "if"? The ATX is on the left when looking at the rear from the rear with > the slot openings facing up. ghe wanted a frame of reference. I gave the ATX > position, CPU position and PS/2 port position as usual "left" references, and > last PCI slot as "right" reference. A BTX is to an ATX oppositely situated > adjacent to the last (if any) slot. How does this differ from a race condition? Cheers, David.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Discussion? New names of betwork devices Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2019-03-22 16:10 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-03-22 17:20 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2019-03-22 17:50 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-03-22 18:30 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices Mart van de Wege <mvdwege@gmail.com> - 2019-03-23 19:30 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2019-03-23 20:40 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2019-03-23 20:40 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-03-24 18:20 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2019-03-23 18:30 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2019-03-22 21:00 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices ghe <ghe@slsware.net> - 2019-03-22 23:20 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2019-03-22 23:40 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-23 07:40 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2019-03-23 09:40 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-03-24 04:10 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2019-03-24 04:30 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-24 07:30 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2019-03-24 08:10 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-03-24 18:10 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-03-24 20:30 +0100
Re: Discussion? New names of betwork devices ghe <ghe@slsware.net> - 2019-03-22 21:00 +0100
csiph-web