Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #199348
| Path | csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: DHCP to static without reboot? |
| Date | Sat, 25 Aug 2018 10:00:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wqBEd-2Kp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <wquCK-79e-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wqxAB-sU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-user@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Sat Aug 25 07:54:54 2018 |
| Old-Return-Path | <gheskett@shentel.net> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -7 |
| X-Asg-Debug-ID | 1535183673-0ea5c037e5d143370001-KlT975 |
| X-Barracuda-Envelope-From | gheskett@shentel.net |
| X-Barracuda-Rbl-Trusted-Forwarder | 204.111.2.17 |
| X-Barracuda-Rbl-IP | 204.111.64.149 |
| X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP | UNKNOWN[204.111.64.149] |
| X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP | 204.111.64.149 |
| X-Asg-Orig-Subj | Re: DHCP to static without reboot? |
| User-Agent | KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20100827.1168748) |
| X-Kmail-Quoteprefix | > |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-Barracuda-Connect | smtp1.edbg.cloud.shentel.net[204.111.2.17] |
| X-Barracuda-Start-Time | 1535183673 |
| X-Barracuda-URL | https://172.26.193.43:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi |
| X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size | 986 |
| X-Barracuda-Brts-Status | 1 |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Score | 0.50 |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Status | No, SCORE=0.50 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=WEIRD_PORT |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Report | Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.56326 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.50 WEIRD_PORT URI: Uses non-standard port number for HTTP |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/739276 |
| List-ID | <debian-user.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/201808250354.32745.gheskett@shentel.net |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 26 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Sat, 25 Aug 2018 03:54:32 -0400 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <201808250354.32745.gheskett@shentel.net> |
| X-Original-References | <alpine.DEB.2.20.1808242012460.4783@themini> <8c888134-b68e-6b60-a42e-e71cce94db09@internode.on.net> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.user:199348 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Friday 24 August 2018 23:33:49 Mark Pavlichuk wrote: > ifdown doesn't seem to work. It seems to complete successfully with > messages about a released DHCP address, but ifconfig shows the > interface is still up, a ping will be returned etc... Though if I try > another ifdown it will say the interface is not configured. > > If I then make configuration changes, then ifup, ifconfig will show no > change. I've experienced that on a armbian install on a rock64, it takes sometimes 2 or 3 powerdown recycles to make a change in e-n-i.d/name of interface to stick. And it doesn't work at all if you try to set a separate netmask, you must use address xx.xx.xx.xx/24 style. So this is not an amd64 problem only. Thats an arm64. -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
DHCP to static without reboot? Mark Pavlichuk <pav5088@internode.on.net> - 2018-08-25 01:00 +0200
Re: DHCP to static without reboot? bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-25 02:30 +0200
Re: Re: DHCP to static without reboot? Mark Pavlichuk <pav5088@internode.on.net> - 2018-08-25 05:40 +0200
Re: DHCP to static without reboot? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-25 10:00 +0200
Re: DHCP to static without reboot? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-08-25 10:30 +0200
Re: DHCP to static without reboot? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-25 10:50 +0200
Re: DHCP to static without reboot? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-25 12:10 +0200
Re: DHCP to static without reboot? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-08-25 12:10 +0200
Re: Re: DHCP to static without reboot? bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-25 14:30 +0200
Re: Re: Re: DHCP to static without reboot? Mark Pavlichuk <pav5088@internode.on.net> - 2018-08-26 06:10 +0200
Re: Re: Re: DHCP to static without reboot? bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-26 15:20 +0200
csiph-web