Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #196948

Re: session trunking with NFS

Show all headers | View raw

	Hi.

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 08:09:48AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:07:28AM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > Personally I'd rather use conventional network bonding on NFS server,
> > and be done with it.
> 
> Conventional network bonding doesn't speed up a single stream, which is why
> people have been looking for alternatives.

That's something I agree with.

But the way I see the things, if one's really needs I/O bandwidth, low
latency and IOPS done in consumer-grade hardware, one should use FCoE,
not NFS. Especially if that's 'one initiator - one target'
configuration.

NFS was designed for multiple clients concurrently accessing the sames
shares, and in this scenario bonding seems much more simplier and
justified solution.

Reco

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

session trunking with NFS "Stefan Krueger" <Shadow_7@gmx.net> - 2018-06-26 09:00 +0200
  Re: session trunking with NFS Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 09:10 +0200
    Re: session trunking with NFS Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-06-26 14:20 +0200
      Re: session trunking with NFS Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 14:40 +0200
    Aw: Re: session trunking with NFS "Stefan K" <Shadow_7@gmx.net> - 2018-06-27 10:40 +0200
      Re: Re: session trunking with NFS Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 12:30 +0200

csiph-web