Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #194172
| From | Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | IPv6 radvd questions |
| Date | 2018-03-26 09:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vxuJP-cu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi all, I'm getting a little confused by the radvd docs, and possibly by IPv6 concepts in general ... The router I'm configuring isn't the default gateway of the LAN; it's an openvpn endpoint (server), and I just want to advertise the routes available via tunnels to the LAN. radvd's prefix blocks, if I understand correctly, are for telling other machines on the local network what range to use for SLAAC, right? Which is a job already being done by (multiple) other routers. Given that, can I ignore the prefix blocks, and just include route blocks? Will that be enough? I'd rather not have to add static routes all over the place. Thanks, Richard
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
IPv6 radvd questions Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2018-03-26 09:30 +0200
Re: IPv6 radvd questions Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-03-26 14:50 +0200
Re: IPv6 radvd questions Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2018-03-27 00:50 +0200
csiph-web