Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #190751

Re: Weired package policy

From Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Weired package policy
Date 2018-01-07 16:40 +0100
Message-ID <v5ldf-15U-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <v5kAy-yj-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <v5l3z-12A-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Am Sonntag, 7. Januar 2018, 16:26:55 CET schrieb Floris:
Hi Floris and all,

maybe my question was not clearly expressed, due to my English. It was not 
aimed to that special package. I would like to know, why packages completely 
disappear, instead of just leaving the last well running version available in 
testing. IMO to fully remove a running version completely in opposite of 
keeping the last good version is in my eyes the worse idea.




> from: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cqrlog
> 
> testing migrations
> excuses:
> Migration status: BLOCKED: Rejected/introduces a regression (please see
> below)
> 164 days old (needed 5 days)
> Updating cqrlog introduces new bugs: #867140
> 
> There is difference of opinion about the libssl version. Buster will have
> 1.1. Cqrlog depends on 1.0

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Weired package policy Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2018-01-07 16:00 +0100
  Re: Weired package policy Floris <jkfloris@dds.nl> - 2018-01-07 16:30 +0100
    Re: Weired package policy The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2018-01-07 16:40 +0100
    Re: Weired package policy Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2018-01-07 16:40 +0100
      Re: Weired package policy Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2018-01-07 20:40 +0100
      Re: Weired package policy Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2018-01-08 01:10 +0100
  Re: Weired package policy Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2018-01-08 04:50 +0100

csiph-web