Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #190751
| From | Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Weired package policy |
| Date | 2018-01-07 16:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <v5ldf-15U-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <v5kAy-yj-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <v5l3z-12A-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Am Sonntag, 7. Januar 2018, 16:26:55 CET schrieb Floris: Hi Floris and all, maybe my question was not clearly expressed, due to my English. It was not aimed to that special package. I would like to know, why packages completely disappear, instead of just leaving the last well running version available in testing. IMO to fully remove a running version completely in opposite of keeping the last good version is in my eyes the worse idea. > from: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cqrlog > > testing migrations > excuses: > Migration status: BLOCKED: Rejected/introduces a regression (please see > below) > 164 days old (needed 5 days) > Updating cqrlog introduces new bugs: #867140 > > There is difference of opinion about the libssl version. Buster will have > 1.1. Cqrlog depends on 1.0
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Weired package policy Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2018-01-07 16:00 +0100
Re: Weired package policy Floris <jkfloris@dds.nl> - 2018-01-07 16:30 +0100
Re: Weired package policy The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2018-01-07 16:40 +0100
Re: Weired package policy Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2018-01-07 16:40 +0100
Re: Weired package policy Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2018-01-07 20:40 +0100
Re: Weired package policy Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2018-01-08 01:10 +0100
Re: Weired package policy Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2018-01-08 04:50 +0100
csiph-web