Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #187160
| From | Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: The mess of package names |
| Date | 2017-09-25 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <utoFb-6Es-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <urvUt-AH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uthu2-263-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 9/24/17, Gary Roach <gary719_list1@verizon.net> wrote: > On 09/19/2017 11:57 AM, Gary Roach wrote: >> Hi all, >> While this may seem to be a bit off topic, I feel that I may get answers >> faster here than any where else. This problem applies to Debian, Ubuntu >> and, to some extent, Mac OS. >> >> I have spent the last month and a half ( or longer) trying to compile >> and link a program called Elmer FEM. The problem that I keep running >> into is the naming practices in Elmer (and all the documents) vs >> Debian/Ubuntu. Elmer requires the following libraries: >> Mumps, MPI, OpenMP, FETI4I as a minimum. Hypre and trilinos have to be >> compiled from source code. The problem is that none if the four >> libraries go under the names mentioned above. By loading everything that >> even came close to the Elmer names I finally got a build that failed in >> the make process (the package uses cmake). The failure is due to the >> missing FETI4I library which have never found. >> >> What I need is a cross reference between Mumps, MPI, OpenMP and FETI4I >> and the library names in the Debian and Ubuntu repositories. >> >> Please, please help. Very frustrated. >> >> Gary R. >> >> > Thank you for all your replies. I now have managed to decipher enough to > get Elmer running. I'm going to post the results on the Elmer Forum and > am thinking about filing a bug report suggesting that the results be > included in the README file. Well on to the next problem. Yay. I tried a couple pokes at this, too. I saw those dotCZ pages. I wondered if they would work. :) I know you say you've put together what you need, but what about Github for later? Yes, I do know Github has its fans and detractors: Am mentioning it because Github was almost the only thing I found that *sounded like* it might be what was needed: https://github.com/ElmerCSC/elmerfem/blob/devel/cmake/Modules/FindFETI4I.cmake If that doesn't work, the front page is here: https://github.com/ElmerCSC/elmerfem/ That first one was a search that was very strange. It seemed to pick out single letters and numbers to match those, not the whole word only. It's surely by design. :) Cindy :) -- Cindy-Sue Causey Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA * runs with duct tape *
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The mess of package names Gary Roach <gary719_list1@verizon.net> - 2017-09-19 21:00 +0200
Re: The mess of package names Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2017-09-19 22:10 +0200
Re: The mess of package names "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2017-09-19 22:20 +0200
Re: The mess of package names Mario Castelán Castro <marioxcc.MT@yandex.com> - 2017-09-20 03:10 +0200
Re: The mess of package names Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2017-09-20 07:00 +0200
Re: The mess of package names Gary Roach <gary719_list1@verizon.net> - 2017-09-24 18:00 +0200
Re: The mess of package names Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 01:40 +0200
csiph-web