Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #187184
| From | Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" |
| Date | 2017-09-25 17:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <utDNT-8jd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ut6ff-3Eq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <utBj4-6Ms-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <utDNT-8jd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:40:12AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 25 September 2017 09:00:51 Greg Wooledge wrote: > > An interface marked "auto" will be waited-for by services that are > > configured to wait for interfaces to be up. E.g. mounting NFS file > > systems, or starting an NFS server. > > > > An interface marked "allow-hotplug" is considered nonessential or > > transient, and the core OS services won't wait for it before starting. > > Thank you Greg. Its not possible to check that because a new minimal > stretch install for an arm64 has no man command. If the man page can be > found, zmore can read it but thats such an eyeball assault you lose > track of what it was you wanted to check. It's not in the man pages anyway. It's the sort of thing you either find out the hard way, or because someone tells you. Also, there's http://manpages.debian.org/interfaces In fact, the man page outright *lies* and says they're synonyms. Didn't notice that until just now.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2017-09-24 06:00 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-09-24 15:30 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2017-09-25 11:20 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-09-25 15:10 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-09-25 17:50 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-25 18:10 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2017-09-25 19:30 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-25 17:50 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 19:30 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2017-09-26 11:40 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2017-09-26 14:00 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-09-26 15:30 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-26 17:30 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2017-09-26 23:30 +0200
Re: in /etc/network/interfaces: "auto" vs "allow-hotplug" Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 01:10 +0200
csiph-web