Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #187052
| From | Juha Manninen <juha.manninen62@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update |
| Date | 2017-09-20 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <urI5j-8tt-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uqhqx-7Ws-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uryIH-2nT-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Fungi4All <fungilife@protonmail.com> wrote: > Isn't Debian 9.1 Stretch? Ah damn, the "9.1" was a typo from me. I experimented with both Stretch and the testing installations under VirtualBox. My post was about "testing" which is now "buster", installed from: debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso > Isn't Buster the same as testing for the next 2 years, give and take > a few months? So there will be no change. Have I missed > something? I wanted to experiment about how Debian testing works as a rolling distro. I have read some people do it successfully. I have good experiences of other rolling distros myself, namely Manjaro and SparkyLinux. SparkyLinux is based on Debian testing but it has no proper installer with memory < 1GB. :( Now having a rolling Debian is not the main issue, it is more about problem solving. Why things don't work as advertised? > It now looks like this : > deb http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/ testing main > deb-src http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/ testing main > # deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security testing/updates main > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ testing contrib main > # deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security testing/updates main > > Who changed stretch to buster? Why change buster to testing? > I keep reading the responses wondering why the rest are responding > the way they do. Like something obvious was overseen! There was "buster" and I changed it to "testing" as advertised here: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianTesting It should be possible by all logic. Why isn't it? Can you reproduce the problem? I am curious what exactly happens. > PS I still have a VHS of Juha Kankunen and his Lancia 037! > It is the first thing that flashes in my head when I hear Juha. :) Juha M.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update Juha Manninen <juha.manninen62@gmail.com> - 2017-09-16 11:20 +0200
Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@iki.fi> - 2017-09-16 11:30 +0200
Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2017-09-16 15:40 +0200
Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2017-09-16 12:00 +0200
Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update Juha Manninen <juha.manninen62@gmail.com> - 2017-09-16 14:50 +0200
Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2017-09-16 15:30 +0200
Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update Juha Manninen <juha.manninen62@gmail.com> - 2017-09-16 20:30 +0200
Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2017-09-17 16:00 +0200
Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update David Margerison <deltam@electrosonics.com.au> - 2017-09-19 14:20 +0200
Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update Juha Manninen <juha.manninen62@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 22:10 +0200
Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update Fungi4All <fungilife@protonmail.com> - 2017-09-20 00:00 +0200
Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update Juha Manninen <juha.manninen62@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 10:00 +0200
Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update Juha Manninen <juha.manninen62@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 21:40 +0200
csiph-web