Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #185875
| From | The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Question to new network device names |
| Date | 2017-08-25 05:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uidap-72c-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <ui0wy-7c2-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <ui1iX-7Ir-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <ui2yl-8q8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ui2RH-kG-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <ui3uq-zR-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | This space intentionally left blank. |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2017-08-24 at 12:40, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 24 Aug 2017 at 12:02:11 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote: >> On 2017-08-24 at 11:43, David Wright wrote: >>> There are plenty of ways that you, or Debian, can set a default. >>> But it surprises me that so many people grumble about this >>> change. The history of computing is littered with statements like >>> "virtually every computer has exactly one or two NICs". >> >> The thing is, currently that statement[1] *is* correct, so >> *currently* the default should be suited for that configuration. >> >> If things ever do reach a point where that is no longer the common >> case, it would then become appropriate to propose changing the >> default to one suited for that more-complex configuration. >> >> But we are not yet there, or indeed anywhere close to there, so >> that should not yet be the default. > > By that argument, you wait until lots of people have problems before > you change the default to accomodate them, instead of thinking > ahead. Well, yes - or at least until lots of people are *about to* have problems pretty soon, unless the default is changed first. That is at least preferable to *causing* lots of people to have problems (or at least experience additional inconvenience) by changing the default too far in advance. > If you want a simpler default, can you not follow the instructions > and give yourself one. Er... what? A default is "what you get if you don't take steps to get something else". If you have to take steps to achieve a given configuration, by definition that configuration is not the default. Thus, since the "old" naming scheme here no longer comes as the default (for new installs, et cetera), I cannot make it the default. I can certainly make local changes to get a non-default configuration, but that does not make that configuration the default. > For people upgrading, Debian ensured that there would not be an > unexpected change; the older methods prevail¹. Missing footnote? >>> This list is full of postings about the complex DNS system. But >>> how long did /etc/hosts last? >> >> It's still there and still in use, albeit not as a primary source, >> last I checked... > > It's the *only* source here for such as 192.168.1.13 wasp but I was > assuming you'd understand I was talking about non-local hosts on the > Internet. Just offhand, I don't think I even remember a time when that file was used (outside of special one-off cases) for such hosts. I also don't remember encountering such a special one-off case in the past several years to a decade, at least, although I wouldn't be at all surprised to learn they still crop up. -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question to new network device names Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-08-24 13:20 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com> - 2017-08-24 13:40 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2017-08-24 13:50 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-08-24 14:00 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-08-24 15:20 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-08-24 15:30 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2017-08-24 15:40 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-08-24 16:00 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2017-08-24 16:30 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-08-24 17:50 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-08-24 18:10 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-08-24 18:50 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2017-08-24 19:10 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-08-24 20:20 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-08-25 05:10 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-08-25 07:30 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2017-08-24 18:40 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-08-24 21:30 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-08-25 03:00 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-08-25 04:30 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-08-25 07:00 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-08-25 07:30 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-08-25 08:30 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2017-08-25 15:30 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-08-25 17:10 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-08-24 17:50 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-08-24 18:00 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-08-24 19:00 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-08-24 19:40 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-08-24 20:00 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-08-24 18:20 +0200
Re: Question to new network device names Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2017-08-25 14:00 +0200
csiph-web