Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #190173
| From | Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: port scans (OT?) |
| Date | 2017-12-23 00:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uZELD-7H1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uZCgO-5VZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uZCJP-6nE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 23/12/17 10:04, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Also cool: If file sharers show up, then keep one on hold until a second > one calls. Then forward their requests to the respective other one. > Two revenges taken for the price of one. So you're acting as a proxy? Does that mean that all files transferred will use your bandwidth, twice, and any enforcement authorities that come looking will assume you're the one doing it? Richard
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
port scans (OT?) Glenn English <ghe2001@gmail.com> - 2017-12-22 21:40 +0100
Re: port scans (OT?) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2017-12-22 22:00 +0100
Re: port scans (OT?) Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2017-12-22 22:00 +0100
Re: port scans (OT?) "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2017-12-22 22:10 +0100
Re: port scans (OT?) Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2017-12-23 00:20 +0100
Re: port scans (OT?) "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2017-12-23 08:40 +0100
Re: port scans (OT?) Glenn English <ghe2001@gmail.com> - 2017-12-23 01:40 +0100
Re: port scans (OT?) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-12-23 00:00 +0100
csiph-web