Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #189209
| From | Ulf Volmer <u.volmer@u-v.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Debian 9 tftp issue |
| Date | 2017-11-22 22:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uOKB3-4Jf-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uOJOF-4dV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uOK82-4kb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uOKrp-4G6-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 22.11.2017 22:03, Catalin Soare wrote:
> However, this means that even though tftpd-hpa is running, it's not
> bound to the port 69? Or at least it's not "listening"; this seems to be
> what the netstat output is saying (there's no "listening" on the line
> with tftpd).
That's normal behavior for netstat and UDP ports. My nameserver for example:
tcp 0 0 172.17.170.1:53 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 25 13544 3208/named
udp 0 0 172.17.170.1:53 0.0.0.0:*
25 13543 3208/named
> Any ideas if I might have to do any additional configuration for
> tftpd-hpa? Or maybe use another tftpd server that has some logging that
> I could rely on?
You can add (multiple) -v switches to TFTP_OPTIONS for turning on more
verbose logging.
best regards
Ulf
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Debian 9 tftp issue Catalin Soare <lolinux.soare@gmail.com> - 2017-11-22 21:30 +0100
Re: Debian 9 tftp issue Ulf Volmer <u.volmer@u-v.de> - 2017-11-22 21:50 +0100
Re: Debian 9 tftp issue Catalin Soare <lolinux.soare@gmail.com> - 2017-11-22 22:10 +0100
Re: Debian 9 tftp issue Ulf Volmer <u.volmer@u-v.de> - 2017-11-22 22:20 +0100
Re: Debian 9 tftp issue Catalin Soare <lolinux.soare@gmail.com> - 2017-11-22 23:20 +0100
Re: Debian 9 tftp issue deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-11-22 23:40 +0100
Re: Debian 9 tftp issue Catalin Soare <lolinux.soare@gmail.com> - 2017-11-23 22:40 +0100
Re: Debian 9 tftp issue Glenn English <ghe2001@gmail.com> - 2017-11-22 21:50 +0100
csiph-web