Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #180372
| From | Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Actually [Re: Some spam] |
| Date | 2017-04-21 19:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tyKQV-gp-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tyJ8u-7AL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 04/21/2017 10:51 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, fc wrote: >> Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? > > Yes, listmaster@lists.debian.org does. > >> I see these types of things come through periodically -- and 1 delete >> on the front end could prevent a lot of woe. > > We discard large swaths of spam. Some inevitably makes it through. > People replying to known spam doesn't help, though. > > See https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ListMaster/ListArchiveSpam for what > you can do to help There lies a significant problem. It states *IN PART* "There is a "report as spam" button in on the list archive page of each message." I believe the design of that button is flawed. It *ONLY* asks if respondent considers that message to be "SPAM". It DOES *NOT*: 1. ask for confirmation. 2. ask WHY message should be considered spam. Also, it does not apparently record *WHO* flagged a message as "spam". I verified that point by experiment. There ONE person on this list who routinely disagrees with me. I chose one of his most spurious posts. Using https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/... I viewed one of his sillier replies. I chose to report it as spam. That was apparent end of the evaluation process. I'm *NOT* suggesting that the poser should be banned. He occasionally posts useful comments. Who/What is appropriate authority to address suggestions for improving the situation. > >> *Even more so* -- it seems like unauthorized users can email this >> list? >> >> Why not just restrict it to people who have subscribed? > > Because that just adds more hoops to jump through for people with a > legitimate question, and lots of spam forges From addresses nowadays, > anyway. >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Actually [Re: Some spam] Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2017-04-21 18:00 +0200
Re: Actually [Re: Some spam] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-04-21 19:50 +0200
Re: Actually [Re: Some spam] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-04-21 20:40 +0200
Re: Actually [Re: Some spam] Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-04-21 21:40 +0200
Re: Actually [Re: Some spam] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-04-21 22:20 +0200
csiph-web