Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #180118
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ... |
| Date | 2017-04-14 11:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tw5fb-7mS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tvTQK-8fn-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tvUtr-jx-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:20:02PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: [...] > Yet, PID 1 is still the only immortal process, unless you have another > new mutant power to produce, and that property is needed to have a > reliable monitoring system. Otherwise, the monitoring process could be > killed, and nobody would notice. You keep repeating this misconception. "Could be" "nobody would". By your logic, Apache and PostgreSQL (among many following this model) wouldn't work. They do. Pretty reliably, at that. Don't get me wrong: I think SysV gave up on something BSD init had, and think it should (and could, in fact) re-gain it, but... it's not as dramatic as (the less informed) systemd proponents would make you believe. Systemd has its strengths. If you managed to concentrate on those, you would do systemd a bigger service. Spreading FUD, by contrast, does it a disservice. Regards - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAljwjn8ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZgCwCdFJP5Gd9EVsvDSHMepS0K5d8F eY4An0gimfOX8hTQ+bhfW8p4CJprIeqq =L8sI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ... Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <j.deboynepollard-newsgroups@ntlworld.com> - 2017-04-13 22:50 +0200
Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ... Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2017-04-13 23:30 +0200
Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ... Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 01:30 +0200
Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ... Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2017-04-14 11:50 +0200
Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ... Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 00:00 +0200
Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ... <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-04-14 11:00 +0200
Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ... Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2017-04-14 11:50 +0200
Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ... tomas@tuxteam.de - 2017-04-14 12:40 +0200
Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ... Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2017-04-14 13:10 +0200
csiph-web