Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #179960
| From | Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: system drive encryption question |
| Date | 2017-04-10 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tuLVf-4hB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tt9yG-52M-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <ttGuB-2vP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tuCRX-6Gd-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Le 10/04/2017 à 10:26, Nathanael Schweers a écrit : > Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> writes: >> >> The procedure in the post you point to is flawed in Debian Jessie (...) > > I never said that it works on debian. Don't misunderstand me : the procedure works with a minor adjustment, so your information was valuable. > I just wanted to point out that > it is not strictly necessary to have an unencrypted /boot partition. And I just wanted to point out that in most cases it is not very useful to have an encrypted /boot.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: system drive encryption question Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2017-04-06 12:20 +0200
Re: system drive encryption question Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2017-04-06 12:30 +0200
Re: system drive encryption question Nathanael Schweers <Nathanael.Schweers@outdooractive.com> - 2017-04-06 13:20 +0200
Re: system drive encryption question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2017-04-07 20:10 +0200
Re: system drive encryption question Nathanael Schweers <Nathanael.Schweers@outdooractive.com> - 2017-04-10 10:30 +0200
Re: system drive encryption question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2017-04-10 20:10 +0200
Re: system drive encryption question Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-04-12 11:50 +0200
csiph-web