Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #179418
| From | Philippe LeCavalier <support@plecavalier.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: SSH Access Issue |
| Date | 2017-03-27 03:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tprkt-8oO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <tp1T3-6N0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tpfsZ-8iN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tphl8-19t-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tphuN-1cT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tpowh-6qe-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:04 PM Joshua Schaeffer <jschaeffer0922@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 03/26/2017 08:30 AM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: > > > In the case I'm thinking, it's about manually adding multiple lines to > a file that I'm not completely remembering just now. Gut is saying > it's /etc/network/interfaces. Mine's almost empty so I don't have an > example to confirm that. > > Typically user's put a second gateway option in the /etc/network/interface > file (which you talk about in the next paragraph). This usually results in > not understanding what the gateway does. > > What I encountered wasn't about declaring different values for > gateway, either. For whatever reasons due to innate [functionality], > it becomes a fail even if you declare the same gateway value for that > line within each new, separate block of declarations. Success is found > by declaring it once then omitting that line within any other new > blocks added over time. > > While I've never put duplicate gateway information in > /etc/network/interfaces I, at one point when learning about networking and > setting it up in Debian, had put a gateway for each subnet in the > interfaces file (which is incorrect and resulted in an error). A gateway, > often called a "gateway of last resort" tells the system how to reach > subnets that it is not attached to. That is the point of the gateway; it is > the one place the system can send packets to when it doesn't know where to > go. If you defined two gateways (meaning if this was allowed) you would be > back to square one, the system wouldn't know which gateway to send the > packet to. Defining two gateways could be an incorrect way of saying you > are defining two routes (most likely static routes). > > Between my setup and cognition, I've never had anything stable enough > to test if it matters which block that gateway is declared. I've > wondered if it matters that it be in the first block, or if it just > needs to show up somewhere in that file. I was consciously putting it > in the first block because that seemed to be the *logical* thing to do > k/t having touched on programming 20 years ago at a local tech school. > > I hadn't really thought about this myself. I've always defined the gateway > under the interface that is attached to the subnet where the gateway > resides. A.K.A. if I have two networks: > > auto eth0 > iface inet eth0 static > address 192.168.0.2/24 > > auto eth1 > iface inet eth1 static > address 10.1.10.2/24 > > And my gateway of last resort was on the 192.168.0 subnet then I would > define the gateway under that interface > > auto eth0 > iface inet eth0 static > address 192.168.0.2/24 > gateway 192.168.0.1 > > It never occurred to me to see if it could be put anywhere in the file. My > hunch is it can and I guess I could take the 60 seconds to test it, but > I'll leave that to more adventurous people. > > > Thanks, > Joshua Schaeffer > I had simply done a route add so I reversed it with a route del. -- Regards, Phil
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
SSH Access Issue Philippe LeCavalier <support@plecavalier.com> - 2017-03-25 18:40 +0100
Re: SSH Access Issue David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-03-25 19:10 +0100
Re: SSH Access Issue Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2017-03-25 19:10 +0100
Re: SSH Access Issue Philippe LeCavalier <support@plecavalier.com> - 2017-03-25 20:00 +0100
Re: SSH Access Issue Philippe LeCavalier <support@plecavalier.com> - 2017-03-25 20:00 +0100
Re: SSH Access Issue <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-25 23:00 +0100
Re: SSH Access Issue Philippe LeCavalier <support@plecavalier.com> - 2017-03-26 14:30 +0200
Re: SSH Access Issue Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 16:30 +0200
Re: SSH Access Issue Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 16:40 +0200
Re: SSH Access Issue Joshua Schaeffer <jschaeffer0922@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 00:10 +0200
Re: SSH Access Issue Philippe LeCavalier <support@plecavalier.com> - 2017-03-27 03:10 +0200
Re: SSH Access Issue David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-03-26 21:10 +0200
csiph-web