Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #183151
| From | David Griffith <dave@661.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: DOSEMU DPMI unhandled exception 0e (it's back!) |
| Date | 2017-07-05 00:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tZEE9-666-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tZxCF-1Bv-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
The trouble manifested when I tried using various components of an old release of Turbo C. Everything, 16 and 32 bit, tickles this bug. On July 4, 2017 7:52:36 AM PDT, bw <apisonco@gmail.com> wrote: >>When I start DOSEMU and use any DOS program, I get "DPMI: Unhandled >Exception 0e - Terminating Client" > >That is really bad news, are you sure it's all programs, and not just >programs that use DPMI ? >If the problem is only DPMI enabled programs, you can probably solve it >with some persistent effort. > >>and then I'm told that the emulator is unstable and should be >rebooted. Running any program after that causes DOSEMU to crash. > >I've used dosemu for a long time, but not on stretch, so I can't test >it right now. It is tricky to setup, as most DOS environments always >were. > >>From what I recall, some programs will require vm.mmap_min_addr set to >0 in sysctl and >you should do your own research before using this, it seems to be a >security risk on networked machines, or was at one point. >Not sure of the current state of things re: mmap_min_addr > >Some older DOS programs have a plain 16 bit ver and a 32 bit DPMI ver, >and some have a switch to turn off use of DPMI. Some also >used an environment variable to limit or control the use of DPMI. >There's also a config option in dosemu.conf to set the base address. ># DPMI base address; default: auto ># If the default value fails, try 0x10000000 > ># $_dpmi_base = (auto) > >>Identical trouble was reported in https://bugs.debian.org/797378 > >That bug showed pkzip as the culprit, not all dos programs? > >If it's the same bug, maybe you should follow the links and file your >bug against the kernel instead of dosemu? >https://ugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866965 > >Good luck, and have fun. Thanks for the heads up I will follow along >in case I run into the same issues. >bw -- David Griffith dave@661.org
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
DOSEMU DPMI unhandled exception 0e (it's back!) David Griffith <dave@661.org> - 2017-07-04 04:20 +0200
Re: DOSEMU DPMI unhandled exception 0e (it's back!) bw <apisonco@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 17:10 +0200
Re: DOSEMU DPMI unhandled exception 0e (it's back!) David Griffith <dave@661.org> - 2017-07-05 00:40 +0200
Re: Re: DOSEMU DPMI unhandled exception 0e (it's back!) bw <apisonco@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 01:20 +0200
Re: Re: DOSEMU DPMI unhandled exception 0e (it's back!) David Griffith <dave@661.org> - 2017-07-05 01:50 +0200
csiph-web