Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #181822
| From | Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet |
| Date | 2017-06-06 15:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tPmSe-YB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tOYwx-2jk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tP0oF-3td-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tPjrj-6ZD-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 10:59:30AM +0100, Ron Leach wrote: > On 05/06/2017 14:08, Henning wrote: > > > >socat > > > > Henning, thank you for that. socat seems a very flexible package. > > Have you used it yourself, at all? I couldn't see from the documentation Yes I connect a serial port over network. > how to terminate socat. I was planning to use a variation of one of their > examples, like this: terminate in terms of "stopping"? I think SIGHUP will work. > > socat -d -d -lmlocal2 \ > TCP4-LISTEN:3129,su=nobody,fork,range=192.168.0.0/24,reuseaddr \ > TCP4:name.server.tld:4444 > > I was also unsure whether socat would hold open a connection to > name.server.tld even if no transactions were taking place, or whether socat > would only open the connection each time traffic arrived on 3129 and it > forked another child process. The documentation seems to imply that the > 'open' takes place before traffic and before forking, which suggests to me > that the connection is opened and remains open. I'd prefer an arrangement > where a connection was made each time a transaction sequence was initiated > by traffic on the local, incoming, 3129 port (in my example), and then > closed when traffic stopped. I'll reread the documentation, anyway. > Well,wel, aren't we a bit high maintenance? However I like how you ask questions intelligently. IMO it's half the way to come to a solution. A rare sight these days. With the fact that socat is pretty much the universal patch cable, you are expecting too much here. It seems you are looking for a protocol aware proxy. If you let us know what protocol ... -H -- Henning Follmann | hfollmann@itcfollmann.com
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
TCP proxy for host on subnet Ron Leach <ronleach@tesco.net> - 2017-06-05 13:40 +0200
Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-06-05 15:30 +0200
Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet Henning <henning@itcfollmann.com> - 2017-06-05 15:40 +0200
Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet Ron Leach <ronleach@tesco.net> - 2017-06-06 12:00 +0200
Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-06-06 12:50 +0200
Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2017-06-06 15:30 +0200
Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet tomas@tuxteam.de - 2017-06-06 16:30 +0200
Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2017-06-06 15:40 +0200
Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet Ron Leach <ronleach@tesco.net> - 2017-06-06 18:40 +0200
Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-06-06 19:10 +0200
Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet Ron Leach <ronleach@tesco.net> - 2017-06-10 13:00 +0200
Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-06-10 15:30 +0200
Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-06-13 14:40 +0200
Re: TCP proxy for host on subnet <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-06-13 21:20 +0200
csiph-web