Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #181355
| Path | csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Issue with notebook (maybe the battery?) |
| Date | Thu, 25 May 2017 03:00:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tKPi9-14X-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <toX34-3vG-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tpcYa-6pH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tpdhw-6NN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tpe3T-773-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tpmEa-4Zk-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tptmh-1vt-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tq4lP-3iY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tq4Yy-3SP-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKEd4-2Lr-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKGeT-40h-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-user@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Thu May 25 00:55:16 2017 |
| Old-Return-Path | <david@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-7.599 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -5 |
| X-Asg-Debug-ID | 1495673698-055413289013bab10001-KlT975 |
| X-Barracuda-Envelope-From | david@lionunicorn.co.uk |
| X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP | cloud11.unlimitedwebhosting.co.uk[149.255.60.164] |
| X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP | 149.255.60.164 |
| X-Asg-Orig-Subj | Re: Issue with notebook (maybe the battery?) |
| Reply-To | debian-user@lists.debian.org |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| User-Agent | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
| X-Barracuda-Connect | cloud11.unlimitedwebhosting.co.uk[149.255.60.164] |
| X-Barracuda-Start-Time | 1495673698 |
| X-Barracuda-Encrypted | ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 |
| X-Barracuda-URL | https://149.255.60.72:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi |
| X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size | 2501 |
| X-Barracuda-Brts-Status | 1 |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Score | 0.00 |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Status | No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.0 tests= |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Report | Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.39138 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/720977 |
| List-ID | <debian-user.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20170525005455.GD16933@alum |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 74 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 24 May 2017 19:54:55 -0500 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20170525005455.GD16933@alum> |
| X-Original-References | <3b28b489-1645-8862-05b7-7bbd3872b119@gmx.net> <762c2880-08d6-c66b-7db9-2c0848b20b66@cloud85.net> <20170326100746.GD5423@tuxteam.de> <20170326114948.0bde5b38@jresid.jretrading.com> <cbb9a6ca-c850-eb75-1b96-2a8d7debd802@gmx.net> <20170327030809.GA18231@alum> <6459afd0-944e-3af6-e244-253b0f0a2dd6@gmx.net> <20170328192453.GA13687@alum> <3325d28b-85e6-fee7-1ed8-145e5f89ea21@gmx.net> <cdMKqhpiilxWvP0ge7m_qyaaFB6d5uyPX_1fHLF_1Lm65moiadYzNwf42T7zgLL2kAzyQMsBnWJABVywyS-iKWGoMVarhwVHxwsynuZ7RYU=@protonmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.user:181355 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed 24 May 2017 at 11:12:36 (-0400), Fungi4All wrote:
> On 28/03/17 16:24, David Wright wrote:
>
> > Charger in:
> > POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_FULL_DESIGN=3800000
> > POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_FULL=872000
> > POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_NOW=3800000
> >
> > Charger out:
> > POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_FULL_DESIGN=3800000
> > POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_FULL=872000
> > POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_NOW=828000
> >
> > IOW my baseline after 8 years is about 20% capacity.
>
> I think at that state it is 95% (828/872) and I think these correspong to 8.28v and 8.72v which is as good as new.
I think you've misread the labelling here: charge, not voltage.
This "good as new" battery yields the following:
2017-05-24-18-19-29 (timestamp)
POWER_SUPPLY_NAME=BAT0
POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS=Discharging
POWER_SUPPLY_PRESENT=1
POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY=Li-ion
POWER_SUPPLY_CYCLE_COUNT=0
POWER_SUPPLY_VOLTAGE_MIN_DESIGN=11100000
POWER_SUPPLY_VOLTAGE_NOW=11968000
POWER_SUPPLY_CURRENT_NOW=1372000
POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_FULL_DESIGN=3800000
POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_FULL=1032000
POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_NOW=998000
POWER_SUPPLY_CAPACITY=96
POWER_SUPPLY_CAPACITY_LEVEL=Normal
POWER_SUPPLY_MODEL_NAME=DELL JG1688
POWER_SUPPLY_MANUFACTURER=Sanyo
POWER_SUPPLY_SERIAL_NUMBER=770
Charge: 96%
2017-05-24-18-42-30
POWER_SUPPLY_NAME=BAT0
POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS=Discharging
POWER_SUPPLY_PRESENT=1
POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY=Li-ion
POWER_SUPPLY_CYCLE_COUNT=0
POWER_SUPPLY_VOLTAGE_MIN_DESIGN=11100000
POWER_SUPPLY_VOLTAGE_NOW=10604000
POWER_SUPPLY_CURRENT_NOW=2036000
POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_FULL_DESIGN=3800000
POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_FULL=1032000
POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_NOW=55000
POWER_SUPPLY_CAPACITY=5
POWER_SUPPLY_CAPACITY_LEVEL=Low
POWER_SUPPLY_MODEL_NAME=DELL JG1688
POWER_SUPPLY_MANUFACTURER=Sanyo
POWER_SUPPLY_SERIAL_NUMBER=770
Charge: 5%
So that's a loss of 91% charge in 23 minutes. The reviewer of
this machine reported a battery life of over 200 minutes.
The large (400 minute) version of this battery went through a
similar course of gradual failure, except that one or more cells
started to go bad:
Feb 2014: laptop power lights started to beat a tattoo, indicating a problem.
Jul 2014: full capacity down to about 30% of the design maximum.
Mar 2015: total failure; battery power lamps flashed 1 3 5 when pressed.
I've never seen a non-linear pattern documented, either for
the short or the long press.
Both batteries date from at least 2009 so I can't really complain.
Cheers,
David.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Issue with notebook (maybe the battery?) Daniel Bareiro <daniel-listas@gmx.net> - 2017-05-24 15:10 +0200
Re: Issue with notebook (maybe the battery?) Fungi4All <fungilife@protonmail.com> - 2017-05-24 17:20 +0200
Re: Issue with notebook (maybe the battery?) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-05-25 03:00 +0200
Re: Issue with notebook (maybe the battery?) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-05-25 02:30 +0200
Re: Issue with notebook (maybe the battery?) Daniel Bareiro <daniel-listas@gmx.net> - 2017-05-25 03:00 +0200
Re: Issue with notebook (maybe the battery?) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-05-25 03:30 +0200
Re: Issue with notebook (maybe the battery?) Daniel Bareiro <daniel-listas@gmx.net> - 2017-05-28 03:00 +0200
Re: Issue with notebook (maybe the battery?) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-06-02 21:40 +0200
csiph-web