Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #181203
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network |
| Date | 2017-05-21 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tJEyt-3rm-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tJ5r4-5g9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tJcLT-24w-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tJCmZ-1R4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sunday 21 May 2017 12:58:05 rhkramer@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, May 20, 2017 09:38:21 AM Gene Heskett wrote: > > You'll note no mention of wifi here as its turned off unless I have > > children visiting with their smart phones. wifi is slower, and > > subject to being used by the neighbors as I found my net usage after > > the kids had been in was up about 80 Gb a month later. > > You know there are security measures available for WiFi, right? I do > two things, I use one of the more advanced encryption protocols > (something like WPA-2 (and maybe some more initials at the end??), > and, I have it setup so that it doesn't announce its presence--only if > someone knows the name can they try to enter a password and login. As of the last time, the SSID broadcast had been turned of, WPA-2+AES was the effective login protocol with a 23 character password . That didn't appear to much of an impediment, so I just turned the radios off. First, they came in thru the buffalo I'm looking at, then they came in thru the pi's radio when it came online, which was still set at the default jessie on a pi settings. I've got cat5 enough to connect everything I want on-line up. I assume one can buy for a winders box, some sort of a utility that can survey the band, and hack into the strongest signal it can find in a time frame thats 0.0000000000001% of what the cryptographers claim. So I take the ultimate hammer to it by turning off my radios. Making a wifi connection work like a wired connection is a major PITA. I had my lappy rigged, about 6 feet from my lathe, and I'd have to login fresh about every 5 minutes. 9 feet from a dongle plugged into the lappy to a matching dongle plugged into the buildings hub? Life, remaining life anyway since I'm working on my 83rd trip around this star, is too short for that BS. Screw it, its extremely distracting when your train of thought is on writing gcode for the lathes next cnc operation. Plug it in and be done with that BS. So I do. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 07:50 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Nemeth Gyorgy <friczy@freemail.hu> - 2017-05-20 09:30 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 10:10 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-05-20 12:20 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 10:20 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-05-20 15:40 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Catherine Gramze <rhiamom@mac.com> - 2017-05-20 17:10 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 10:20 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-05-21 19:00 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-05-21 21:20 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2017-05-22 14:50 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-05-22 17:00 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Kent West <westk@acu.edu> - 2017-05-22 17:20 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-05-23 17:30 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2017-05-24 00:50 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-05-24 20:50 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 10:20 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-05-26 11:00 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-05-27 19:10 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2017-06-01 13:00 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-06-01 13:30 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network メット <mett@pmars.jp> - 2017-06-01 15:10 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2017-06-02 12:00 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-06-01 13:10 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-05-21 05:50 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-05-21 06:10 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2017-05-21 16:40 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 01:40 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 10:40 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2017-05-26 12:30 +0200
Re: [A bit OT] Diagnosing home network Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-05-27 07:20 +0200
csiph-web