Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION]

From	rhkramer@gmail.com
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION]
Date	2016-10-29 22:30 +0200
Message-ID	<sxIql-2SN-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<swbZw-7sf-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <sxHui-2gb-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sxHXj-2qm-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Saturday, October 29, 2016 03:53:21 PM Brian wrote:
> On Sat 29 Oct 2016 at 15:28:14 -0400, rhkramer@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 29, 2016 08:54:59 AM Reco wrote:
> > > On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:16:18 -0400
> > > 
> > > rhkramer@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > I'm not the OP or anybody that has participated in this thread so
> > > > far.
> > > 
> > > [1] tells me otherwise, for the 'participation' part. I take it that
> > > this e-mail I'm replying to is shared among several people, then?
> > 
> > Oops, sorry, you're right--somehow I forgot all about that.
> > 
> > > I believe you're missing the point here. The page in question is not
> > > supposed to provide information on mounting anything as a *key piece*
> > > in the first place due to very nature of the topic the page describes.
> > > 
> > > But since such information is in there for some reason, and it's
> > > covering *both* mounting and unmounting in a compact enough form - it
> > > can be used as an example for mounting and unmounting also.
> > 
> > If I say anything, I'll just be belaboring the point further, so I won't.
> > Or, I will, I was only trying to support the OP who said there was
> > nothing of
> 
> What would you have wanted to see? Please be detailed. The OP is
> unlikely to respond, so we are relying on you.

I'll have to think about that--maybe nothing--my first thoughts are that:
   * I agree that page didn't need to go any deeper,
   * but I also agree with the comment the OP made, something like there was 
nothing substantial about pmount on that page--he apparently (or might have) 
tried one of the other two alternatives, and failing that, have asked for more 
help, as he did...

Thread

Permissions for an entire PARTITION Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-10-25 17:40 +0200
  Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-10-25 17:50 +0200
    Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-10-25 18:10 +0200
    Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-10-25 18:40 +0200
      Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-10-25 18:50 +0200
        Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-10-28 17:30 +0200
          Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-10-28 17:50 +0200
          Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2016-10-28 21:40 +0200
            EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-10-28 22:50 +0200
              Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] "John L. Ries" <jries@salford-systems.com> - 2016-10-28 23:10 +0200
              Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-10-29 00:20 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-10-29 01:40 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 11:20 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 14:20 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 15:00 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-10-29 16:10 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 17:50 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-10-29 20:20 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 22:30 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-10-30 00:50 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 10:30 +0100
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-10-30 14:00 +0100
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-30 14:20 +0100
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-10-30 18:10 +0100
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 21:30 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-10-29 22:00 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 22:30 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-10-30 01:10 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-30 01:20 +0200
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 13:00 +0100
                Re: EUREKA!!!! - was [Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION] David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-10-31 02:30 +0100
          Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2016-10-29 15:30 +0200
      Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2016-10-25 19:40 +0200
      Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-10-26 10:20 +0200
        Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-26 13:20 +0200
          Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-10-26 14:30 +0200
            Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-10-26 14:50 +0200
            Re: Permissions for an entire PARTITION Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2016-10-27 07:50 +0200

csiph-web