Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working?

Path	csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	rlharris@oplink.net
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working?
Date	Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:40:02 +0200
Message-ID	<siSUG-5AI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<siSBk-5tr-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Sun Sep 18 22:30:20 2016
Old-Return-Path	<rlharris@oplink.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.815 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MONEY=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.315, STOCKLIKE=1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oplink.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:To:From: Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=N+CZO9lSjIlm0jvEGYfEfowe3Wz43vcAxgmXYQAxlP8=; b=Xg04xrbI3bGY/tt5YrW2pWMo6l DqatPoQy0tHV6BCRk2M7CO39LPb4UmxI5E7MhubcZWSwrd2EU8ovqVJfqc+YnbsfR1B9gfC3P7ufB jFBVVkK7NRLXQEzHrLE01JlsRYFAKAf3vLo7XRL5hRC3plZtgvn2TGx8p64sPOdA9lZM=;
User-Agent	SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN]
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Antiabuse	This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-Antiabuse	Primary Hostname - cpanel1.oplink.net
X-Antiabuse	Original Domain - lists.debian.org
X-Antiabuse	Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-Antiabuse	Sender Address Domain - oplink.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via	cpanel1.oplink.net: authenticated_id: rlharris@oplink.net
X-Authenticated-Sender	cpanel1.oplink.net: rlharris@oplink.net
X-Filter-ID	s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIfVnugXp/XOikwbN0z/01X0mT5WYr/+9vgRhMwhHMpgQx1wTMkEUUoeb KIhkyzl2dBVTOr6yS4y5R/pXH5Aqb9sSvN9NCYbTCvB9a0lvb9m5gZ/Tw6DoY/8c2+5B5/2kISDH pDYvAGz9SvCxHRSxuIbGHjVm3kEhDg1eKOoNwj4UPdak0pvYDoOmCzIAjM6Omi3breeaRmS0N1SH eKK+UkaEwYqCm+Pjue3eK+Shsol7vCrJPmnnTHzVkpybMK7ZTYmWNT81jjW18NKjXaUkeaEeYY7E 21UZqO5xTA1dIPQLP99nvuX1asuLDeNsLqAm3RWaHq4k/MHLuK2aRge6bC/5z8Jd15j8au7ZKci8 USofrOjsBxSo3OuQ7WRDUhbxpytBLahVX2NbrAIVYELTW28wjeP+ja35n0p5MgrYHfP0v0nYbGGD hDOBvUIEvwPKm6wBJV0d9u2TcuUjykHCviPzlum7y/QwuN9VpRdS8XJMuuxxoG4aVvvdK0bbhKfq uGDizGslwxDtJA5DyfTUWAIJsghvknMXQ++kl+mPEwS/Fa8T/tLIJqmlnZbppTPdBWmynJrS1Xkw GvOPgCJFeqRUeocIm22tq3feOySIkureNolFQpxP2CT5X0aZsyQxcqy0VHCv/SC4DsQGzPWpPBaL UWlKK5A4x5qP0d1P9ufC9jihx+Za/cV70jOJzN2r4A==
X-Report-Abuse-To	spam@filter01.reliabledns.org
X-Originating-IP	216.230.224.98
X-Spamexperts-Domain	outbound.oplink.net
X-Spamexperts-Username	216.230.224.98
Authentication-Results	reliabledns.org; auth=pass smtp.auth=216.230.224.98@outbound.oplink.net
X-Spamexperts-Outgoing-Class	ham
X-Spamexperts-Outgoing-Evidence	Combined (0.22)
X-Recommended-Action	accept
X-Mailing-List	<debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/711944
List-ID	<debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/5b8ec52b79d659626c4f89bfe65f839d.squirrel@webmail.oplink.net
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	16
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:30:01 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID	<5b8ec52b79d659626c4f89bfe65f839d.squirrel@webmail.oplink.net>
X-Original-References	<20160918221053.4EBAB287@bendel.debian.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.user:172413

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sun, September 18, 2016 5:10 pm, brian wrote:
> My dear old Laserjet 5N finally having died, I bought an HP Laserjet
> P1109w to replace it. I have managed to install it to the extent that
> it's recognised (USB connection, not wireless) but the problem is that it
> apparently needs a *proprietary* plug-in to print properly.
>
> I have H-Ps installer, and everything goes OK up to the point at which
> it goes to an unspecified H-P site to download the plug-in.

Installer?  Plug-in?  Are you using CUPS?  Is the P1109w not in the CUPS
menu?

I picked up a P3015 for $150; it runs perfectly under CUPS and is the best
printer I ever have used.  I am using the Ethernet interface.

RLH

Thread

Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working?  brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-09-19 00:20 +0200
  Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? rlharris@oplink.net - 2016-09-19 00:40 +0200
    Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-09-19 01:00 +0200
      Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-09-19 01:40 +0200
        Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 19:40 +0200
          Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 20:30 +0200
            Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 20:30 +0200
    Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 08:40 +0200
      Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? gianluca <gianlucarenzi@eurekelettronica.it> - 2016-09-19 09:30 +0200
        Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 11:20 +0200
          Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 12:10 +0200
  Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Dutch Ingraham <stoa@gmx.us> - 2016-09-19 01:10 +0200
  Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> - 2016-09-19 02:00 +0200
  Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 08:30 +0200
    Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-09-19 10:50 +0200
  Re: Laserjet p1109w - anyone got it working? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 10:40 +0200
    Re: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-09-19 12:00 +0200
      Re: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-09-19 12:20 +0200
      Re: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 15:50 +0200
        Re: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED Ralph Katz <ralph.katz@rcn.com> - 2016-09-22 01:20 +0200
          Re: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-09-22 10:30 +0200
            Re: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 12:30 +0200
              Google [was: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED] [slightly OT] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-09-22 13:00 +0200
                Laserjet p1109w - FIXED [back OT :)] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 13:50 +0200
                Re: Google [was: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED] [slightly OT] deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 14:30 +0200
                Re: Google [was: Laserjet p1109w - FIXED] [slightly OT] Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 15:20 +0200

csiph-web