Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #176641
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d |
| Date | 2017-01-13 09:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sZ5IB-75W-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sYSs1-7lL-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sYSBI-7oY-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sZ5fA-6Wf-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Friday 13 January 2017 03:16:50 Matthias Bodenbinder wrote: > Am 12.01.2017 um 19:43 schrieb Michael Lange: > > Just a shot in the dark: > > maybe the apt-get update at boot time is done before a network > > connection has been established? I noticed that this can lead to the > > exact behavior you describe when pinning is in use. Apparently a bug > > in apt. > > > > Regards > > > > Michael > > Hello Michael, > > I gave it a try. I unplugged the network and did an apt-get update. > This is throwing all the errors that the repos are not available. But > in the end the next "apt-get dist-upgrade" indeed wants to update all > packages to testing. > > So it seems that this is an issue with network not ready while apt-get > update is being performed. > > How do I fix this? Where to look? > > And thank you for the hint, Michael. > Matthias An old geezers thoughts on this is that if I see any error fetching the lists when I do an apt update, or apt-get update, I consider the system frozen in place until such time as the update succeeds w/o any errors. And I'll for sure question this list if the errors persist to the next day. Debian may have suffered a machine failure, and its replacement might take a day to configure, and possibly another day to get synchronized, and only then might I update my sources list. But in these times, there is a high likelyhood of a round-robin setup at the debian site, spreading the load to 2 or 3 more other machines. So quite often and update done immediately after a failed update, works fine. We users appreciate that, very much. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
apt-get is not following preferences.d Matthias Bodenbinder <matthias@bodenbinder.de> - 2017-01-12 19:40 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-01-12 19:50 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d Matthias Bodenbinder <matthias@bodenbinder.de> - 2017-01-13 09:20 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-01-13 09:50 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-01-13 10:20 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-01-13 11:10 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2017-01-12 20:40 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d Matthias Bodenbinder <matthias@bodenbinder.de> - 2017-01-23 08:50 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-01-23 12:00 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d Matthias Bodenbinder <matthias@bodenbinder.de> - 2017-01-25 07:20 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-01-25 20:10 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d Matthias Bodenbinder <matthias@bodenbinder.de> - 2017-01-27 07:10 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-01-27 19:10 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d davidson@freevolt.org - 2017-01-27 19:50 +0100
Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d davidson@freevolt.org - 2017-01-27 19:20 +0100
csiph-web