Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #175559

Re: potential damage to Debian "stable" when installing packages from "testing"

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:58:18PM +0200, Martin T wrote:
> let's say that I need a package named "weechat"(version 1.6-1) from
> Debian "testing":

Let's not say that.

Let's instead say "I am running jessie, but jessie's version of weechat
(1.0.1-1) is missing some features I need.  What should I do?"

The next step then is to look at jessie-backports.  There is a newer
version of weechat (1.5-1~bpo8+1) in jessie-backports.  So try that
one.

If that one STILL isn't new enough for you, then you have two choices:

1) Install weechat yourself from upstream source code.
2) Upgrade your entire system to stretch (testing).


> # apt-get install -t testing weechat
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following extra packages will be installed:
>   binutils libc-bin libc-dev-bin libc-l10n libc6 libc6-dev libgcrypt20
> libgnutls30 libhogweed4 libncurses5 libn
>   weechat-curses
> Suggested packages:
>   binutils-doc glibc-doc rng-tools gnutls-bin weechat-doc
> Recommended packages:
>   manpages-dev weechat-plugins
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   libc-l10n libgnutls30 libhogweed4 libnettle6
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>   binutils libc-bin libc-dev-bin libc6 libc6-dev libgcrypt20

BAD! BAD! BAD!

> I guess one should not worry about new packages?

You should ABSOLUTELY worry about the UPGRADED pacakges!  Especially
when one of them is libc6.  That will affect basically EVERY program
on your entire system.

You should NOT do this!

Mixing testing and stable sources produces what we call a frankendebian.
It is an unsupportable mess.  It is not a question of whether it will
break, but rather HOW SOON it will break.

This is why we have jessie-backports.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

potential damage to Debian "stable" when installing packages from "testing" Martin T <m4rtntns@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 13:00 +0100
  Re: potential damage to Debian "stable" when installing packages from "testing" Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-12-08 14:20 +0100
    Re: potential damage to Debian "stable" when installing packages  from "testing" <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-12-08 15:00 +0100
    Re: potential damage to Debian "stable" when installing packages from  "testing" Alex Mestiashvili <alex@biotec.tu-dresden.de> - 2016-12-08 16:30 +0100
      Re: potential damage to Debian "stable" when installing packages from  "testing" Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2016-12-08 21:00 +0100
        Re: potential damage to Debian "stable" when installing packages from  "testing" Alex Mestiashvili <alex@biotec.tu-dresden.de> - 2016-12-09 11:40 +0100
      Re: Re: potential damage to Debian "stable" when installing packages  from "testing" Clive Standbridge <list-user@tgstandbridges.plus.com> - 2016-12-09 01:10 +0100
  Re: potential damage to Debian "stable" when installing packages  from "testing" Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 14:30 +0100

csiph-web