Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #175271

Re: mdadm - two questions

From kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca)
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: mdadm - two questions
Date 2016-11-30 13:10 +0100
Message-ID <sJbS2-5UT-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sGnd0-1Py-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIEMq-T5-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJ5jA-1Ed-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJ9Gy-4mz-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> writes:

> Hi Kamil,
>
> You’d get a bit more space by configuring your 4 drives as a RAID5
> array (3TB usable for RAID5, vs 2TB usable for RAID10).  The downside
> of RAID5 is that the RAID10 (or the one LV with two RAID1 PVs — they
> amount to the same thing for this discussion) can survive loosing two
> drives at once — if they happen to be the right two drives: i.e. not
> both sides of a single mirrored pair — while RAID5 would not be able
> to survive any failure that involved two drives at once.  Either
> configuration would survive loosing any one single drive, of course.
>
> If you want to be able to survive simultaneous loss of any two drives, you should look at RAID6, which would have the same usable capacity (2TB) as the RAID10.

I though about this, but I'm afraid about performance (calculating
control sums ). Needlessly?
KJ

-- 
http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html
Davis' Law of Traffic Density:
	The density of rush-hour traffic is directly proportional to
	1.5 times the amount of extra time you allow to arrive on time.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

mdadm - two questions   kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca) - 2016-11-22 18:40 +0100
  Re: mdadm - two questions Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-11-22 19:10 +0100
    Re: mdadm - two questions kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca) - 2016-11-22 21:40 +0100
      Re: mdadm - two questions Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-11-22 22:00 +0100
        Re: mdadm - two questions kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca) - 2016-11-23 06:40 +0100
      Re: mdadm - two questions Jens Sauer <jsauer65@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 22:10 +0100
  Re: mdadm - two questions Frédéric Marchal <frederic.marchal@wowtechnology.com> - 2016-11-23 14:10 +0100
  Re: mdadm - two questions kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca) - 2016-11-29 01:50 +0100
    Re: mdadm - two questions Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2016-11-30 06:10 +0100
      Re: mdadm - two questions   Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2016-11-30 10:50 +0100
        Re: mdadm - two questions kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca) - 2016-11-30 13:10 +0100
          Re: mdadm - two questions   Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2016-11-30 14:20 +0100
      Re: mdadm - two questions kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca) - 2016-11-30 13:00 +0100
  mdadm - Progress mails of checkarray now missing Hans Kraus <hans@hanswkraus.com> - 2016-12-10 21:10 +0100

csiph-web