Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #171162
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: ISO Verif: Is the "default 512 block size" == "I/O sector" size? |
| Date | Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:50:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s74HT-71z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s6YCt-34T-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Wed Aug 17 08:41:56 2016 |
| Old-Return-Path | <scdbackup@gmx.net> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-8.987 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="utf-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Provags-ID | V03:K0:jcX/njKNtEphJhoDjATg5r2UyIJvhB3hOBhRIYsmAra3XlTURwE i7KZXFLx4Vh3+JGt5+Le0ExRE7oeXwhPkoPjJpOR+PMM3JnnbELs8h456wglRa/hwrlepZ1 JHOIj5/7jCFCCwxCDOiYSXebF5fuLbdf7KIISa/AAs/BoJbgRe+6mjjvfNGj2tNoa+Srflw cMKE9MNiJsoTlJgDNaSJA== |
| X-Ui-Out-Filterresults | notjunk:1;V01:K0:ow530YKmZdY=:sbVHsYrY6MZJyAHItZeLwi lS2N7O17Wg+UBFdxN5pB2qnMSHKx7qxEd/BAQwdMpKVvbGt75hemr0aQV1CSrZQypDVOlNON6 uErfSW9KjscXFAftYGOT+5D9FwEnjAFYPuQfrOEOrPN01uo49t+HWgrVpFHRlschfUKMFQyLz qq3KuyinxqbqFPkQbTXQFY2608/7JkYOqZ9MFitmH6QYD8/H+7m6h3oQ5CALbAp9Y2ewzf8T+ EVZJ0LN7QMDtU201cnUuvOYojzQTxgG2mD/V/PqAQ2Cp637rZ5J50ru8z1KUgonqa7bzeXda4 NqzhQH8oWi0/aYVzDOUgZX++8rn6MstPqhZbDjqJmvps2Rv+GM6jgYyaN1S0TiGeRC/FkqjuA 9PadhKzdFM01YBPELV1OodxSfpEGVm5Hm137wA2byJX4RxrFa+Fi/NW5ieY9rTxj1YLzY4sBg RY8CT6IqLg2+4Q4OevJ84ruSgH+PhXAXFL/nGlmI7hteowezUN2hfNheV73L/WPU8rWtRYJFG TK64pZQojsIgD/SqLDJCI5wU3k0vbc9qfTArkuTaJGLUE3ikGrqTrwpYdFeMvntRKBsid6dHv 3b2FD/SHVyTxv1Cf1NWvYJHzoHTbCdDRRLoAi5GaaI+uRBMc4Z/ZK9b5Xc40SEkfOWJ4xiGsN 7glZHnCPMp6zwd+FYKowuvmUwx44s5rTNQZNNqcwjKiiDDEetPXfVQ46WTYC9Agp1F8Bl/aVv JTApt5CDI3XGB8cILVLCFBCUWc2OEbNqYxuPDyufNCjPvruPlyyEbTTrc/CrkNEiB/t2Qku5C 1jPJuIJ |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/710684 |
| List-ID | <debian-user.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/4679588318869811007@scdbackup.webframe.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 93 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | andrew.comly@protonmail.com |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:43:21 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <4679588318869811007@scdbackup.webframe.org> |
| X-Original-References | <cZQdM32POAtOjHMAEVMXA5R-iPRMlYrdrjI8I1v5xd3qPjFYVykrdTFmx96OBFG3NOeGlmfiz7fgMB5uJL3mjTVhDpDv9zav75DGqBVbeoc=@protonmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.user:171162 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi, Andrew F Comly wrote: > You said earlier that 512 is the default block size. The default of program "dd", to be exacting. Block size is normally a property of devices and filesystems. Many devices offer direct random access only at the granularity of their block size. E.g. a CD can be read in chunks of 2 KiB. If software needs to address in finer steps then it has to load full blocks and pick from them the bytes which are desired. Filesystems use block addresses to point from name to data. It is technically desirable that file system block size is an integer multiple of the device block size. (Multiplication factor 1 is normal.) > I looked up that "bs" also refers to block size. Option bs= is the combination of dd options ibs= and obs=. The program uses these sizes for single read or write operations. (One may experience surprises if the input does not deliver full blocks or the output demands larger ones.) The advise to use large bs= when curbing data reading from a device or file is merely to improve the read and write speed. Copying many small chunks can impose substantial overhead. > So it appears that we have two "block sizes". In the case of buffered i/o on a USB stick or DVD you may more or less use any block size which divides without remainder the desired amount of bytes. (Giant sizes should be avoided because they bring no improvement while filling giant memory buffers.) > $ fdisk -l fdisk seems to assume block size 512 with data files. With devices it obviously inquires their block size. E.g. with a CD: $ /sbin/fdisk -lu /dev/sr4 ... Units: sectors of 1 * 2048 = 2048 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1988 cylinders, The Cylinder/Head/Sector addresses of disk-like devices are quite bogus nowadays. They are uphold for legacy software (and to confuse programmers like me). Regrettably MBR partition tables show these numbers, so one has sometimes to find the factors sector-per-head and heads-per-cylinder from comparing Logical Block Addresses with CHS adresses. (Mathematically this is equivalent to the task of finding those points of a 2D-parabola which have integer coordinates.) 255 heads (per cylinder) and 63 sectors/track is a poor guess, of course, as 16358768640 consists entirely of prime factors 2, 3, and 43. The numbers 255 and 63 contain prime factors 5, 7, and 17 which spoil any attempt to match above big number by integer multiplication. The reason for 255, 63 is simply that they are the largest values possible for heads-per-cyl and sec-per-head in the CHS address fields of a MBR partition table. The range of CHS addressing ends at 8,422,686,720 bytes, because MBR partition table entries can only record up to 1024 cylinders. So with your 32 GB stick, CHS is a mere ornament. > Is my hypothesis that the "512 block size" is the "I/O" or "sector" size > correct? Roughly yes. But mainly in the case of fdisk, not so much in the case of dd. WIth fdisk the number 512 stems either from device properties or from the default of fdisk, if no device properties can be inquired (as from a data file). Unless the input of dd is a device which may deliver less than the block size in a single read operation, you are free to choose a dd blocksize. (It can become tricky with pipes as input. Even if you choose a block size lower than the pipe buffer size, you imay get less input bytes per block than expected.) Have a nice day :) Thomas
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ISO Verif: Is the "default 512 block size" == "I/O sector" size? Andrew F Comly 康大成 <andrew.comly@protonmail.com> - 2016-08-17 04:20 +0200 Re: ISO Verif: Is the "default 512 block size" == "I/O sector" size? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2016-08-17 10:50 +0200
csiph-web