USB tethering and interface naming on Debian/unstable

From	Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	USB tethering and interface naming on Debian/unstable
Date	2016-05-02 11:30 +0200
Message-ID	<ruikV-Pa-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

What is the rule for interface naming when doing USB tethering
on Debian/unstable (with systemd)?

In December, I had enx02060b0e3333, but yesterday, I had enp0s20u2.
Isn't the interface supposed to be fixed?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

USB tethering and interface naming on Debian/unstable Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-05-02 11:30 +0200
  Re: USB tethering and interface naming on Debian/unstable David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-05-02 16:00 +0200
    Re: USB tethering and interface naming on Debian/unstable Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-05-06 01:10 +0200
      Re: USB tethering and interface naming on Debian/unstable David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-05-06 04:00 +0200
        Re: USB tethering and interface naming on Debian/unstable Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-05-06 11:30 +0200

csiph-web