Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #165762

Re: Bond and Bridge problem

From Mimiko <vbvbrj@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Bond and Bridge problem
Date 2016-03-21 11:40 +0100
Message-ID <rf5pE-4hd-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <reQ7g-26U-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rf2Br-2nn-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 21.03.2016 09:31, Igor Cicimov wrote:
>  > The problem is when I do `service networking restart` I get this message:
>  >         RTNETLINK answers: invalid argument
>  >         Failed to bring up br0


I found the rout cause of this error:

ip link set dev br0 mtu 9000  up
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
Failed to bring up br0.

And the rest options (like adding default gateway) stops processing.

Isn't incorrect to specify mtu 9000 to bridges?

How about bonds? Or, to which interfaces mtu is valable?

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bond and Bridge problem Mimiko <vbvbrj@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 19:20 +0100
  Re: Bond and Bridge problem Igor Cicimov <icicimov@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 23:00 +0100
    Re: Bond and Bridge problem Mimiko <vbvbrj@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 07:40 +0100
      Re: Bond and Bridge problem Igor Cicimov <icicimov@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 08:10 +0100
        Re: Bond and Bridge problem Mimiko <vbvbrj@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 08:20 +0100
  Re: Bond and Bridge problem Mimiko <vbvbrj@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 08:40 +0100
    Re: Bond and Bridge problem Igor Cicimov <icicimov@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 08:50 +0100
  Re: Bond and Bridge problem Igor Cicimov <icicimov@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 08:40 +0100
    Re: Bond and Bridge problem Mimiko <vbvbrj@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 11:40 +0100
    Re: Bond and Bridge problem Mimiko <vbvbrj@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 11:50 +0100

csiph-web